Dylan

One by one hearing all the different versions of “the look on your face” all great

I used to love the fact that after a tape swap you would pick up a nice track like ej and echoes cheap and that to me was as good as hearing big money sounds. Hearing stuff like that and being able to find copies happy days.

I think that was the one of the first records I obsessed over getting a copy. Provably not my number one but certainly near the top of the list. eddie Parker “if you must go” probably my all time number one but I don’t listen to it too often now. You can have to much of a good thing..... but when I do listen it’s still special. same could be said for quite a few others.

Considering the quality and rarity it was cheap not that I could afford it.

His voice is a lot better on “no time” sounds quite different.

Something like the Nancy Wilcox you are buying a piece of history of what is a great song and didn’t get an official release until 2013 or 14. if I were very rich that kind of acetate would appeal to me for the history of it. But I’d have to vinyl pied piper release to play.

John had updated his auction notes to 65

I did just try to find that extract as a test but failed.

How do you find these old magazine extracts ?

There would have been a lot of artists trying to capture that James brown sound and that dates the Mac staten flip far more accurately IMO. mcgees is also very good.

It’s nice to get the discussion going maybe we will get a definitive answer ? as time goes on establishing the true facts about these records will only get harder and harder.

Yes I saw that but to my ears that is never a 63 sound.

Not just the voice but the backing track as well. It’s basically a novelty pop record a la girls aloud etc etc

Yes they are auction notes with the intention of talking up the records as much as possible so should be taken with a pitch of salt. I think a lot of people find them a bit OTT now though.

Yes that was my initial thought but didnt want to appear rude.

Thats a nice tune. on the same page is mac staten "there she goes" john has it as a 1963 release in the description. Is that right it sounds later ?

It could just simply be that a lot of stock was found. A lot of collectors who want records for the dance floor won’t care for it so may only want it for a low price and don’t think it deserves a premium.

It took me a few years to find a copy. I did then find a second copy which I easily sold quickly for around 150gbp. All this was probably between 2000 and 2010. I suspect these are some kind of legitimate copies that have been done later but I just don’t know so wanted to see what others thought. The font on the labels looks a bit thinner possibly? I love the record it’s fantastic.

I noticed a lot of copies of let your sweet love are on discogs cheap. I'm a little out of touch with this 45 did it get a repress or did a lot of original copies come to the market ? if it is repressed how do you tell an original from a repress ? thanks.

Same could be said for so many records vibrations on that auction list being another. great oldie but a daft price. and as already been said sweet darlin how is that so much. I’ll be your champion I was found much harder to come across. Even that is probably not that hard to find.

Just listened to it a few more times it’s a fantastic all nighter record.

The idols is great don’t remember ever hearing that in a club.

You’re so fine is the side I remember hearing first and hearing the most so that one for the memories

I paid more than that for Robert sanders and also sold it for more than that. roughly double. magnetics is fantastic but that’s serious money like with most records of that calibre.

goldies take on what DJ’s should be doing.