You stated, amongst other things, "As for instrumentals having soul, your having a giraffe arnt ya mate, I'm not saying that instrumentals arnt good dance records in some cases, but the vocal is what adds the real soul & I doubt any sane person could argue with that."
So you agree then that instrumentals have Soul, it's just that the vocals add 'real' Soul. Is that not what you just said?
Now I've never argued that it's not the vocals that adds 'real' Soul to an instrumental but instrumentals can have Soul, which is why we all rave over the likes of Exus Trek, etc. Some records almost ooze Soul, or R&B, whatever.
Cast your mind back to the last time you said to yourself, oh my God, just listen to the lyrics/vocals on that record, I just gotta get up and dance. Chances were it was always the rhythm that got you going first, then as you listened more closely to the record and grew fonder of the record the 'real' Soul of the record kicked in via the vocals/lyrics, or the 'real' Soul. Well, on dance records anyhow, which is what Northern Soul is mostly about, dance records, right? But with Soul of course. That goes without saying. Or does it? Look at periods in the history of Wigan Casino. But that's best forgotten about eh.
Obviously, there is a LOT more to Northern Soul records than just it's ability to make you hurl yourself toward the dancefloor so that you can dance your little socks off and everybody has their own opinions on what makes a good Northern Soul record, but we won't go into that here.
Anyhow, I think this discussion needs closure, so I suggest that we just agree to disagree.
I love instrumentals and could listen to a few hours worth no problem. It would seem that I'm in the minority of perhaps 2 or 3 so will concede that it probably wouldn't work . . . but it's still a good idea.
I'm off quick before the next hail of opposing comments.
Been nice winding you all up.