Personally I think if you put almost any of the records in Kev's top 500 book on at a soul night, you'd have people up and dancing. To me that means they are the most popular, so consequently worthy of a place in the top 500. Kev's personality/business acumen shouldn't really come into it as he was in a good position to judge, bearing in mind the Casino held weekly nighters for eight years, and back in the day the dance floor was king. Take into account how long Kings Hall has been running and the fact that it always has a full house,.... I'd say his credentials are in good order.
With the fairly recent advent of multiple venues on every week, the scene has fragmented, so in different areas different records have become popular. That's a personal taste thing, and of course "newer" DJ's want to push their latest acquisitions and create their own niche and reputation, but it doesn't mean that their choices would necessarily get rave reviews all over the country. The top 500 are by and large loved by all and mostly criticised because they've been played so often, not because of their quality, which leads me to think the adverse reaction is all to do with who the author is. Most people appear to have at least one copy of it, even the people criticising it, which I find a little strange. If it's not needed, doesn't interest you, has nothing interesting in it, why buy it in the first place?
Winnie:-)