Ah well, so here we go again...
To save all fellow soul source members the time and effort
heres Simons first thread and attempt...
/Eddie-P...by-t100911.html
So all I have to say (now in public as I have done so several times before via private email communiction) is:
1. Those were not my records, I posted the whole sale for a friend who ain`t a member on here
2. I checked all records before and the Eddie Parker 45 was a mint ORIGINAL (see link above) with the big ARCHER stamp in the run out groove.
3.
Simon complained about said record being the bootleg only two days after the record was posted here in Berlin Germany (on the afternoon by the way..). There is no way at all he could actually already have had received the record when he complained about it being a bootleg.
When Ralf (the seller) immediately asked him to resend the 45 for a refund Simon kept on asking for an adress to "return" the 45 to...which "smelled" to Ralf in a way because if Simon already would have had received the parcel and the 45 he would have not to ask for an adress but only would have to read what senders adress was given on the envelope, would he not ?
"Funnily" enough a week later all of a sudden Simon said he had Ralfs adress now and asked for a confirmation of this adress via email.
Well, I guess he must have had received and read the parcel by now!
So as I am not blind and know what kind of record I was holding and grading when I had said copy in my hands and as I am also not yet stupid enough to believe Simons story work I sadly have to think of a real smelly fraud here. Buying an original and trying to return a boot. Thanks god Simon opened the case already two days after payment had been send and the 45 had gone off as that only just goes to proove he actually never had the bought 45 when he started to claim its a boot!
The seller informed me that Simon also already had started a paypal claim which was turned down by paypal for obvious reasons. I guess that this is the reason for this open public attempt against me now on here ?
I have been trading and selling records ever since I started collecting which is now already 25 years ago and I never ever sold a boot (knowingly) off as an original myself. Furthermore any missunderstanding or problem was solved more or less easy.
Furthermore these reocrds being put up for sale did not belong to me. So having stated that the record was an original anyway I refuse to be responsible for any missunderstandings or controversials between the seller and the buyer. I asked Simon several times to keep me out of it at all (as i got CC in every singel email the two were sending out) and to try to solve this directly with the seller.
I doubt that any of the kind people who for example put up the sales of ravingmadrecords or Joe Dunlop (just to name two who are not members onhere and therefore their sales get listed by other third parties) would take responsibility for each and every sale which finalises thru any of these sales threads.
Thank you for your time,
Marc