This is an interesting thread on a subject that needs addressing IMHO, but it's a thread full of red herrings:
I've read the above post a couple of times and maybe I've not fully understood it, but I just can't help coming up with a few questions:
I've been to some of Mick's nights over the last few years and I've always considered the music policy fairly progressive... what do you mean by "emphasis on oldies?
Are you saying that you were "avoiding clashing" with Mick's nights as they were bi-monthly, so you only clashed on alternate months?
If you have such a high opinion of the Union and "all 4 of you would definitely be" there if not for your own do, why did you not arrange yours on a different night so that you were able to go?
This another red-herring. Just because people like one "sub-genre" of the scene, it doesn't preclude them from enjoying another one, but if two events are on the same night any potential customer for both has to decide on one only.
Very true.
Well said. That's what I mean about red herrings.
Overkill is a major problem in some areas even without clashing and the east midlands and east anglia suffer the worst IMO. My nearest city is Peterborough, where there have been three regular soul clubs for a number of years... 12 or so events per year = most people happy. In the last 12 months three new events have started. One genuinely offers something different and attracts its own clientele, but the other two are just a re-hash of the existing local scene and are diminishing that scene because, although the nights seldom clash, many people do not want to go to a soul night virtually every week in the same town, therefore customers are spread more thinly... it's inevitable.
The picture is very similar in Northants. Those are just the places I know... seems it's happening almost everywhere if you take into account the post about Sheffield. (And it's a sad day when the Ponds Forge Lads hang up there boots IMO.. one of the best soul nights of all!)