Just been flicking around Ebay playing a few sound clips of one or two of the bigger ticket items currently on offer and have noticed despite the poor condition of the records the bidding is still pretty serious, now correct me if I'm wrong but in my thirty or so years in collecting, wheeling and dealing in records condition has alway's been the single most important factor for me and I'm sure many others, despite this it would seem that some collectors are happy to have the records no matter how poor the condition is, there is currently a Jackey Beavers - Revilot on offer with a top bid of over $500.00 and I suspect it will finish a lot higher than that, the record is described as VG yet the sound clip to me say's otherwise it's noisy, hissy and IMO not worth having as it will only get worse with play's, so is it sometimes more about actually owning the original record, it's label and history rather than actually having a first class copy that will do what it's intended to do and that is play? seems a little more like stamp collecting than record collecting as there is nothing worse than hearing a tune at a venue that has seen better day's even worse actually owning a copy of a top tune in very poor condition just for the sake of having it.
The general opinion from most record dealers is condition is paramount and is the major factor in the buying and selling of records or is there certain records and instances that this rule does not apply? as I can't see the point in having a record in my box which I can't play because it's dished, of course it's getting harder to source clean copies of forty year old records but if a record is in poor condition no matter what it is then it to a point has to be worthless, if Kenny's Frank Wilson hissed and popped all the way through would it still sell for thousands? or is it more also about the kudos of owing something which is almost
unique?
Regards - Mark Bicknell.