There is a thread about this on the forum which explains the differences and also points out the contradiction in what is written above. The case for the 'prosecution' (in terms of the supposed bootleg nature of the *originals...i.e 70's pressings) rests, seemingly, purely on the fact that the record wasn't (apparently) issued to the public at the time, and so, therefore (apparently) isn't the original...but...(apparently) something else entirely different. Contrary to what you're reading above, those copies (as advertised above) are re-issues. Full stop. They were done a few years back after the guy saw someone selling a used copy for about $125, which made him get all angry. I've probably still got the (initially evasive) emails he sent me somewhere relating to this. As Gringo points out, the originals (70's issues) don't have the engineer's name on the label. The represses (not boots, btw) do.