Andy co-runs Lotusland Records and was part of this record's production...maybe even played on the record too.
Not in Post 43 he doesn't...not that I can see...doesn't even mentioned Northern in that post...the Northern Scene only really came into question when Speedlimit started this thread (tell me he wasn't being paid off )
No, it smacks of a group doing what they enjoy - old records, old music and playing music that references old music and issuing it and selling it on a (traditionally) old music format...a 45rpm 7" single. I'm sure their real intent was to try to emulate the sound of the music that they all love without worrying if their actions were derivative, overtly referential or unoriginal - they'd be the first to acknowledge that it does all three of those! It's pointless judging something by what it's not - 'nu-soul' 'neo-soul' or 'organic soul' it aint, it has nothing in common with chart R&B and it isn't 'future soul' or any other modern day music type. It's a deliberate look back at a period when muic was golden and you can tell they had fun doing it! Ok, so it sounds more 60's soul than 60's funk and within that, sounds more 'northern' than Southern, etc, so by a process of elimination you can say they took the decision to make it sound similar to a certain 'sound': Northern. Big deal. Maybe they like that sounds, or maybe one of them lay in the tub humming a tune, fiddling with their bottle of Matey and suddenly had a eureka moment! Who knows? (can you still get Matey? )
Don't think it was at all cynical...if they were truly being cynical they'd have concocted some story about a 'mystery 45' that seems to have just appeared, ebayed them with scant info, dripped them out slowly and took as much money as possible...kind of like what has happened in the past with funk things and a certain Northern thing if you recall. Or failing that, got a few djs to play it covered up, built up the panic, held onto them for a few months then dripped them on ebay, watching them sell for $$$ (kind of like that utter tosh Frank Popp cover up!) before skimming out the remaining copies for as much as possible (kind like what people do with old records that they have 100's of...) and fielding the flack that would no doubt follow. Maybe he shouldn't have made a point of pointing out the limited run, maybe a few of them are old US-indie heads where the numbered limited edition 45 is the norm and just adds the air of 'uniqueness' to the object and they were making it in that spirit?
Surley it's more cynical to use records to bolster your image, or to try to buy friends or to attempt to move closer to the top of some weird fictional league table?
Anyway, this initially started with the funk crowd, not on here - The way this happened was that some of us heard this, albeit obliquely originally, made enquires and liked it enough to pre-order a load for resale. I can't speak for anyone else but I'll be doing them at what I consider a fair and reasonable price (nothing like £20+ that cheeky f**kers were asking for Nicole Willis, or the £20 that someone offered the Ellipsis reissue for on here a few weeks back!) and less than, say, Grapevine reissue 45's or the latest 45 from Real Sidelist for.
But at that time that would have been a contemporary sound, not a 'throwback' sound, so in essence that point isn't really valid...nor are the other examples of then modern releases (King Tutt etc) being played because the arguement here is that it sounds deliberately retro, even though it's a new release.
Because you like it?
Because you like it more than some of the thousands of rarely played 60's and 70's releases that you may have heard?
Because you're playing to an audience who have no bias towards new and old and no history to consider when they're out having a good time dancing to music?
Because you think it's great and want to play it?