I think the initial premise is right. Soul music, on the whole is dead in today's commercial terms. Current 'Soul singers' are referred to as Duffy, and Amy Winehouse. So the public perception of 'Soul music' differs greatly from the view held by the majority of members here.
Of course the argument becomes flawed as soon as the writer starts having a go at the Northern scene. Especially when it comes to the live acts. I've seen more live acts in the last ten years then I did in the whole of the Seventies, Eighties, and Nineties. Where ? On the Northern Soul scene, at Cleethorpes and Prestatyn.
The argument is also flawed regarding it being a Northern Dance scene. That held true back in the Seventies when yes, quite clearly, the emphasis was on the right beat to dance to. Now, nearly thirty years later the Northern Soul scene is a greatly changed animal from those days. But hey ! What do you think those Soul singers made the uptempo records for in the first place ? Guess what ? They were made for people to dance to !
Trotting out the old one about the DJs being more important than the artists is also a flawed argument. In the environment where the records were being heard, a dance hall, of course the DJs were the most important pivitol figure involved. It wasn't a group of black guys from 5000 miles away standing on the stage singing was it ? If the artists had been available to perform the songs live, they would have been the most important factor, but quite simply they weren't, so the person playing the records became the focus.
To be honest, having re-read the article again, it's a pretty mediocre piece of work, starts well, and then loses it's way completely in a morass of biased and miscomprehended assertions.
4 out of 10