I can't believe the vitriol being levelled at this piece of inoffensive pop house. I'd never heard it until this thread and was expecting far worse. I wonder what grates so particularly about it? It actually takes a fair bit of skill to make something so inane but insidious.
I go along with Davie in that people have a right to listen or dance to what they want to without being told off about it.
The interesting thing to me (and might be useful for a separate topic) is Ian's point about getting 800 people in one room on any part of the UK soul scene to dance to a record these days not being particularly easy. Think back to the huge dance floors of the past and maybe one can excuse some of the more inane and/or accessible tunes played.
If that video looks embarrassing to people because they're dancing to Bob Sinclair would it make it any less embarrassing if the same people were dancing in the same way to some of the mega oldies which John Manship has been auctioning in recent times and which people have been salivating over in other current topics?
Are Larry Clinton or Gwen Owens any more 'underground' in any way after thirty five years of being pressed, re-issued, blasted on youtube to a global audience etc.? Or are we just obsessed too much about the format? Is it not really all just about the price tag?
Of course it's nice to see these classic originals in nice condition, but is building a scene around those particular artefacts any more legitimate or indeed any more to do with 'Northern Soul' than this?