I would like to say you are wrong Jock, but you are probably right in some cases. Not all though.
When I put that do on for Pete last year, I did initially think about putting it on for charity. Well, for all of five seconds.
I knew all the hassle it would cause and that it would only detract from the day so I decided to pay for it myself.
Charity is a very emotive subject and it has to be done right. Of course there will be costs but these should be limited to essentials such as room hire, equipment, flyers etc.
The costs that were incurred at a recent charity event in Wellingborough just seem excessive to me.
If you don't make any money out of a night you advertise as being for charity - can you really call it a charity night?