Jumpinjoan

Or freeze them before you went. Personally it wouldn't bother me in the slightest cos very rarely I drink. Even when I do then it's no more than one or two. I would love to say it wouldn't matter, but in all honesty, it probably would. The only way to find out is to do go ahead and do it. Because as you know yourself Jayne, what people say on here and what they do are two completely different things. It will be the second and third nights that will tell what people really think imo.

Jeez... wish I hadn't just had an early lunch Can somebody please help complete his collection please... then we can have the old Jock back again!

I'd like it a bit better if it was about the tunes that made you the guy or girl you are today!

Never been too good at being subtle Phyllis - you should know that I wouldn't say I have been negative either - just persistant with my one question that's all.

Should we be scared now?

I will spell it out for you - and its Joan not Jean. You said: And I said - what has condition got to do with anything?

You think they are brave - I think they're not. You think this man has tried to re-assure everyone that the production will be as real as possible to the era - I think he's done nothing of the sort. But does that matter? I think not. You think this film will entice new blood onto the scene - well, you could well be right. Won't we have fun when they turn up to their first 'proper' soul do expecting to hear Duffy and Paul Weller! You say you don't get it why people are so negative about this film? I don't think people are being negative Phyllis - people are passionate that's all. Some a lot more than others it seems. I couldn't give a toss what the story is about to be honest. The only thing I care about is whether they use the ORIGINAL RECORDINGS by the ORIGINAL ARTISTS. Something I thought everyone would care about. Boy was I wrong on that one.

And not only mission accomplished - mission accomplished FOR FREE!

Hi Phyllis, I'm sorry - but 'brave to come on and answer peoples questions'? What's brave about logging onto an internet forum? You can't seriously think they are going to take notice of anything we have to say? These people couldn't give a spin or a backdrop about what we think! They have come on here for one thing and one thing only - publicity. So as far as this forum is concerned - its MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Jeez you lot must be good - being able to judge people's looks and dancing skills over the phone!

And here's what 1,000+ people looks like. And you don't intend paying any one of them? You lot are taking the piss!

No they are NOT paying them Paul. This is on their advert - and I quote: "Please note, there are no fees for extras or dancers. We will make a contribution to your travel."

Not true my friend. I have loads of records that go for far too much imo. This, however, is not one of them.

Or maybe its because this is at least the second time Cookie has listed it for sale on here?

quality!

I give up! Can't believe I'm arguing with Ted Massey about the likes of Duffy and Amy Winehouse! Knock yourself out guys

You think? I'd say they were all little toes on the same soul less foot

Here's a question - what about the DJ's? Will they have actors playing the original Wigan DJ's I wonder? Hope so - who do you think will play Dickie Searling?

I don't think its negativity Ted. People are passionate that's all. Some more so than others it would seem, but surely that doesn't surprise you? As for the people behind the film regretting getting involved with this site? Behave! They couldn't give a flying fig what people on here think! And they sure as hell ain't going to listen to a word any of us have to say. All publicity is good publicity to them - and as far as they are concerned - it's a job well done with this site!

You don't have the rights to that one then

You think? I was just asking the question I have asked God knows how many times (and got no answer to) simply and clearly. Shame it wasn't answered the same clear and simple way.

Easy with the sarcasm. But to do this would mean using the original recordings by the original artists would it not? To the best of my knowledge people weren't dancing to Paul Weller and Duffy records at Wigan Casino in 1974. And they certainly aren't dancing to them on the soul scene today.

Sorry, don't understand what you mean by this? What has condition got to do with anything? He sold them btw

Here's an easy one for you as it only requires a one word 'YES' or 'NO' answer. WILL YOU BE USING THE ORIGINAL RECORDINGS BY THE ORIGINAL ARTISTS?

I'm guilty of this one Jane! My thinking is if the unthinkable ever happened - it would be my word against whoever's. This way it could be proven one way or the other - with minimal damage to the record. To the naked eye anyway!