Guest selectasoul Posted December 27, 2008 Posted December 27, 2008 Hi, Anyone know if Jim Gilstrap on U.S. BELL 45,474 was ever booted?? I have just found a dodgy looking copy from a DJ distributors lot I purchased. It has the same track on both sides and the label copy looks washed out. Looks like a boot but I can't find any evidence of it being pressed. Anyone know different? Cheers Richard
Prophonics 2029 Posted December 27, 2008 Posted December 27, 2008 Is it demo, saw him sing it live at Cleethorpes a few years back sounded better than the record.
Daz Mc Posted December 27, 2008 Posted December 27, 2008 Hi, Anyone know if Jim Gilstrap on U.S. BELL 45,474 was ever booted?? I have just found a dodgy looking copy from a DJ distributors lot I purchased. It has the same track on both sides and the label copy looks washed out. Looks like a boot but I can't find any evidence of it being pressed. Anyone know different? Cheers Richard defo , it was on a label called soul brother records...blue/ white label , think i sold mine a few yrs ago. Its on j.m's list as side effect feat jim gilstrap
Guest selectasoul Posted December 27, 2008 Posted December 27, 2008 Is it demo, saw him sing it live at Cleethorpes a few years back sounded better than the record. It's an issue.
Guest selectasoul Posted December 27, 2008 Posted December 27, 2008 It's an issue. But was it ever booted on Bell, regular grey issue??
Dave Abbott Posted December 27, 2008 Posted December 27, 2008 . Its on j.m's list as side effect feat jim gilstrap the Side Effect is the first version before jim gilstrap went solo and a slight different take...(which was in itself booted as "True Effect")
Guest Ivor Jones Posted December 28, 2008 Posted December 28, 2008 the Side Effect is the first version before jim gilstrap went solo and a slight different take...(which was in itself booted as "True Effect") HELLO LADS, HOPE YOUVE ALL HAD A GREAT CRIMBO......... THIS HAS BEEN COVERED BEFORE BUT JUST TO RECAP.......... THE COPY YOU HAVE IS 100% A BOOTLEG.........IM SURE ITS SOMETHING TO DO WITH IAN LEVINE AS HE WAS CHAMPIONING THAT PARTICULAR RECORD AT THE TIME IT WAS BOOTED AND THE ORIGINAL WHICH IS A STYRENE ISSUE SEEMS TO BE EXTREMELY RARE. IVE SEEN PROBABLY 10 COPIES OF BERNIE WILLIAMS ON THE SAME LABEL FOR SALE AND IVE ONLY EVER SEEN THIS FOR SALE TWICE,JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA............ IT WAS BOOTLEGGED AT DAMONT RECORDS[iTS GOT DAMONT IN THE RUN OUT GROOVE],WHICH WAS BASED IN HAYES WHERE I LIVE[iTS GONE NOW]. RALPH TEE WHO IS ONE OF IANS BEST FREINDS I BELIEVE HAD AN OFFICE IN THE SAME BUILDING............. I MAY BE COMPLETELY WRONG THOUGH ........ AS A FOOTNOTE, ITS MILES BETTER[iMHO] THAN THE PREVIOUSLY UNRELEASED[bEFORE SOUL BROTHER RECORDS IN PUTNEY PUT IT OUT] VERSION BY SIDE EFFECT. IT WAS THIS VERSION THAT WAS EARLIER BOOTLEGGED AS "TRUE EFFECT" ON A 4 TRACK BOOTLEG WITH A SPRAYED SILVER LABEL. YOU MAY HAVE SEEN THEM KNOCKING AROUND IN SALES BOXES OVER THE YEARS......... KEEP SEARCHING OLD BEAN......... BEST, IVOR
Guest Nick Harrison Posted December 28, 2008 Posted December 28, 2008 Thanks for clearing that up......and good investigation work too Ivor, now I also own a 100% bootie - but well so what, its a better version. Thanks. Nick.
Guest Ivor Jones Posted December 28, 2008 Posted December 28, 2008 Thanks for clearing that up......and good investigation work too Ivor, now I also own a 100% bootie - but well so what, its a better version. Thanks. Nick. TELL YOU WHAT THOUGH NICK, ITS REALLY FRUSTRATING FOR ANYONE OWNING THE BOOTLEG BECAUSE IT WAS LIFTED DIRECTLY FROM IAN LEVINE`S[OR WHEREVER IT CAME FROM ] COPY,WHICH WAS REALLY BADLY DAMAGED WITH NEEDLE BURN FOR ABOUT THE FIRST 30 OR SO SECONDS. IN FACT ITS THAT BAD THAT IT MAKES YOU WONDER WHY ANYONE WOULD BOTHER. GREAT RECORD THOUGH..........AND YES IT IS BETTER THAN THE SIDE EFFECT ORIGINAL VERSION,NO CONTEST....... IVOR
Bully Boy Posted December 28, 2008 Posted December 28, 2008 TELL YOU WHAT THOUGH NICK, ITS REALLY FRUSTRATING FOR ANYONE OWNING THE BOOTLEG BECAUSE IT WAS LIFTED DIRECTLY FROM IAN LEVINE`S[OR WHEREVER IT CAME FROM ] COPY,WHICH WAS REALLY BADLY DAMAGED WITH NEEDLE BURN FOR ABOUT THE FIRST 30 OR SO SECONDS. IN FACT ITS THAT BAD THAT IT MAKES YOU WONDER WHY ANYONE WOULD BOTHER. GREAT RECORD THOUGH..........AND YES IT IS BETTER THAN THE SIDE EFFECT ORIGINAL VERSION,NO CONTEST....... IVOR Tell Me Ivor, do you big up all your own Original Records this way Hope You Had A Good One Mate! Best Bully
Guest Ivor Jones Posted December 29, 2008 Posted December 29, 2008 Tell Me Ivor, do you big up all your own Original Records this way Hope You Had A Good One Mate! Best Bully ouch............ I feel mortally wounded .............. Absolutley Cookie Boy....... Ivor
Sebastian Posted December 29, 2008 Posted December 29, 2008 ITS MILES BETTER[iMHO] THAN THE PREVIOUSLY UNRELEASED[bEFORE SOUL BROTHER RECORDS IN PUTNEY PUT IT OUT] VERSION BY SIDE EFFECT. The Side Effect version was issued on an LP from 1973 called "Effective" on the GAS label.
Guest Ivor Jones Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 The Side Effect version was issued on an LP from 1973 called "Effective" on the GAS label. [/quote Just noticed this.........Wow, never knew that,thanks Sebastian........ Best, Ivor
Steve G Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 I believe Levine's copy ended up with Tim Brown. I still don't have an original of this..
Dave Fleming Posted January 4, 2009 Posted January 4, 2009 I believe Levine's copy ended up with Tim Brown. I still don't have an original of this.. There was also a copy that turned up on Ebay a few years back, the seller ended the auction early,when i asked why he said a guy from England called JM had made him an offer he could not refuse Dave f............
Steve G Posted January 4, 2009 Posted January 4, 2009 There was also a copy that turned up on Ebay a few years back, the seller ended the auction early,when i asked why he said a guy from England called JM had made him an offer he could not refuse Dave f............ Yes Dave and that copy went to someone else on this thread.
Souljazera Posted January 6, 2009 Posted January 6, 2009 TELL YOU WHAT THOUGH NICK, ITS REALLY FRUSTRATING FOR ANYONE OWNING THE BOOTLEG BECAUSE IT WAS LIFTED DIRECTLY FROM IAN LEVINE`S[OR WHEREVER IT CAME FROM ] COPY,WHICH WAS REALLY BADLY DAMAGED WITH NEEDLE BURN FOR ABOUT THE FIRST 30 OR SO SECONDS. IN FACT ITS THAT BAD THAT IT MAKES YOU WONDER WHY ANYONE WOULD BOTHER. GREAT RECORD THOUGH..........AND YES IT IS BETTER THAN THE SIDE EFFECT ORIGINAL VERSION,NO CONTEST....... IVOR quite bizarre that they never bothered to clean it up with ian,s multi million pound studio !!! tis an easy job if u know what to do !! PRO TOOLS n all that
Steve G Posted January 6, 2009 Posted January 6, 2009 quite bizarre that they never bothered to clean it up with ian,s multi million pound studio !!! tis an easy job if u know what to do !! PRO TOOLS n all that It was styrene and from memory the sound was pretty well gone on the first twenty seconds
Souljazera Posted January 6, 2009 Posted January 6, 2009 It was styrene and from memory the sound was pretty well gone on the first twenty seconds hi steve....pro tools is quite a powerful tool...plus additional filters ..not too hard to repair...suppose ian was too bothered with take that comeback !!!!!!!!
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!