Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, can anybody tell me if the Butlers "Laugh Laugh" on Lost Nite is a reissue, I know a lot of the records on this label are reissues.

Cheers

Jimmyw

  • Replies 22
  • Views 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most active in this topic

Posted

Hi, can anybody tell me if the Butlers "Laugh Laugh" on Lost Nite is a reissue, I know a lot of the records on this label are reissues.

Cheers

Jimmyw

there is stuff like Lee Andrews "Cold grey dawn" and "Cant Get along without You" that only came out on Lost Nite. But Butlers first came out on Red then Blue text Phila lable as far as i know?

steve

Posted

Hi, can anybody tell me if the Butlers "Laugh Laugh" on Lost Nite is a reissue, I know a lot of the records on this label are reissues.

Cheers

Jimmyw

Got it on Phila 1836 somewhere - think it's the original version.

Posted

there is stuff like Lee Andrews "Cold grey dawn" and "Cant Get along without You" that only came out on Lost Nite. But Butlers first came out on Red then Blue text Phila lable as far as i know?

steve

Hi Steve, thanks, I know that there were a couple of local issues on Lost Nite that's what made me ask given that it was issued on Phila.

Jimmyw

Posted

there is stuff like Lee Andrews "Cold grey dawn" and "Cant Get along without You" that only came out on Lost Nite. But Butlers first came out on Red then Blue text Phila lable as far as i know?

steve

blue first and red second..........altho red is rarer

Posted

I thought that the red was first and got withdrawn because it was misspelt the Bulters

That's what I thought too, mine is red and spelt "Bulters"

Posted

red is the first as far as I'm aware.

evidence that red is first is that the PREVIOUS butlers record on Phila (it's jean wells backed by the butlers and charles earland, it's one number earlier) is red print.

Posted

i do agree the easy option is to say that the red text copies were withdrawn because of the mispelt

artist credit and then correct it on the blue copies.it sold very well in philadelphia so they probably

let the red text copies out anyway. being a small set up they couldnt afford not to sell them. remember

it came out on lost nite and also on the collectables. im just trying to keep an open mind on the first issue

2nd issue talk because some people assume the harder release is always the first issue and that aint right.

all phil la copies are original anyway.

dave

Posted

i do agree the easy option is to say that the red text copies were withdrawn because of the mispelt

artist credit and then correct it on the blue copies.it sold very well in philadelphia so they probably

let the red text copies out anyway. being a small set up they couldnt afford not to sell them. remember

it came out on lost nite and also on the collectables. im just trying to keep an open mind on the first issue

2nd issue talk because some people assume the harder release is always the first issue and that aint right.

all phil la copies are original anyway.

dave

I agree with you that people (not always correctly) assume that the rarer release is the first. But also, the previous number on the label also came out only on red text.


Posted (edited)

Seems logical if the first was miss spelt to press it up on a blue copy so you could see the difference from a mile away without reading each record individually. :g:

So this theory would backup the possibility of the first press being red.

Edited by Prophonics 2029
Guest vinylvixen
Posted

I thought that the red was first and got withdrawn because it was misspelt the Bulters

I can't believe it's not Bulters....I've got the blue one :lol: Who cares - it's a great tune and should get played and played until we all get sick of it :g:

Guest in town Mikey
Posted

It seems an odd one to bring out on a reissue label. Isnt the blue one a qualifier for Warren's Cheap As Chips night?

Guest vinylvixen
Posted

It seems an odd one to bring out on a reissue label. Isnt the blue one a qualifier for Warren's Cheap As Chips night?

Probably - criminally underrated tune. Still gives me goosebumps every time I hear the intro and transports me back to a time when unaccompanied women weren't allowed in a public bar in Wigan laugh.gif I'll be playing it at Stafford Rangers in December smile.gif xx

Posted

Probably - criminally underrated tune. Still gives me goosebumps every time I hear the intro and transports me back to a time when unaccompanied women weren't allowed in a public bar in Wigan :lol: I'll be playing it at Stafford Rangers in December :lol: xx

Couldn't agree more, an absolutely cracking tune :lol:

Get involved with Soul Source

Add your comments now

Join Soul Source

A free & easy soul music affair!

Join Soul Source now!

Log in to Soul Source

Jump right back in!

Log in now!

Source Advert





×
×
  • Create New...