ChrisOD1964 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 (edited) i have some modern NEWIE cds which i never play will swap for northern cds off topic i know but shy bairns get nowt chris Edited October 27, 2008 by ChrisOD1964
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 I see what you're saying...but like I said previously...why the need to call it anything at all...to me my catagorisation is more about the style of music...R&B, 60s sounds like 60s...70s the same...contemporary...and my version of modern(newer stuff) all have their own distinctive sounds...surely that's far less complicated? So a venue playing mainly past modern anthems would advertise their night how?
Guest Nick Harrison Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Aha! The old chestnut raises it's head once again! My personal definition of a modern oldie is seventies and eighties stuff that was played between 1978/9 through till the late 80's. This post by Pete clears the whole thread up - 1978 to 1988 Modern Oldies Term time. True Fact.
Guest Beeks Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 So a venue playing mainly past modern anthems would advertise their night how? A Modern Night...plays what is defined as modern music...doesn't matter how old it is...like I said...should be based on the style of music...like when everyone clears the floor when 70s comes on in a nighter...you know what it is straight away(shite) Same applies I suppose
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 A Modern Night...plays what is defined as modern music...doesn't matter how old it is...like I said...should be based on the style of music...like when everyone clears the floor when 70s comes on in a nighter...you know what it is straight away(shite) Same applies I suppose I give up
Guest Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 80s is 80s...90s is 90s and anything post y2k is modern for me...just think its ridiculous all these catagories and i'm sorry but modern oldie has to take the biscuit for most ridiculous sub genre...might as well be kids banging on about speed garage! Angie Stone is a modern oldie? I don't think so And don't even get me started on why Nu Soul is wrong...it's like people saying something is Phat Angie Stone - "I wish I didn't miss you" and the other one I really love! have been out for several years and played to death in modern rooms (and northern rooms) it's a modern oldie. Where's Roger when you need him! LOL . He could explain this better. You can't just call it all modern. The following all come under the banner of "modern" but You could go to Village soul, Martin Dixon's night in Sheffield, Seductive Soul, the modern room at Prestwich, Lin's SU night and visit two 'modern rooms' at KGH. You could call them all modern nights but you would have very different experiences musically. Jayne.
Guest Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 So a venue playing mainly past modern anthems would advertise their night how? old skool modern. Or I would anyway. Though modern anthems would work.
Guest Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 (edited) A Modern Night...plays what is defined as modern music...doesn't matter how old it is...like I said...should be based on the style of music...like when everyone clears the floor when 70s comes on in a nighter...you know what it is straight away(shite) Same applies I suppose Shouldnt encourage you but that did make me laugh! ....Who cares about labelling (anything) anyway, (imho) so long as we all know what turns us on/doesn't?!? (By the way Pete, is that park bench the ONLY furniture your dog is allowed on then? ) Edited October 27, 2008 by Delasoul
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 old skool modern. Or I would anyway. Though modern anthems would work. What i meant there Jayne is you couldn't really just put modern, as Beeks in his wisdom suggests
Sean Hampsey Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 It's as someone said earlier... ... It's a description for any record previously classed as a 'Modern' record, now too old to be truly 'Modern'.... hence 'Modern Oldie'. End of. Sean
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Shouldnt encourage you but that did make me laugh! ....Who cares about labelling (anything) anyway, (imho) so long as we all know what turns us on/doesn't?!? (By the way Pete, is that park bench the ONLY furniture your dog is allowed on then? ) I am ashamed to say that isn't the park it's my very poorly tended garden, and correct he can't sit on the couch
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 It's as someone said earlier... ... It's a description for any record previously classed as a 'Modern' record, now too old to be truly 'Modern'.... hence 'Modern Oldie'. End of. Sean In a nutshell
Peter99 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 In a nutshell The thread is dead and done! Nice dog Pete.
Guest Gavin Page Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 So a venue playing mainly past modern anthems would advertise their night how? A Night Of All Things Soulful From the 70s to Today ?
Peter99 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 A Night Of All Things Soulful From the 70s to Today ? I like that. Not much wrong with yer head mate. Err, well........................
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 A Night Of All Things Soulful From the 70s to Today ? Gav my question was aimed at Beeks and his theory, not really a general enquiry
Peter99 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 old skool modern. Or I would anyway. Though modern anthems would work. I don't like the term old skool. But anyway the thread is dead the thread is dead!
Guest Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 I am ashamed to say that isn't the park it's my very poorly tended garden, and correct he can't sit on the couch Mine neither....yea "the thread is dead....lets do (soul) dogs instead!" (poet,didnt know it!? )
Peter99 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Mine neither....yea "the thread is dead....lets do (soul) dogs instead!" (poet,didnt know it!? ) Can we do old dogs and new dogs?
Guest Beeks Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 ok...here goes...R&B, Oldies, Crossover, Modern and new(Not Nu) soul I think that covers everything no?
Peter99 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 ok...here goes...R&B, Oldies, Crossover, Modern and new(Not Nu) soul I think that covers everything no? What about the dogs Beeks? I thought we'd moved on.
Guest Beeks Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 What about the dogs Beeks? I thought we'd moved on. You're Barking up the wrong tree again Pete...everyone knows thats 'Hound Dog' Soul
Guest Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 ok...here goes...R&B, Oldies, Crossover, Modern and new(Not Nu) soul I think that covers everything no? No it doesn't. nearly though.. Jayne.x
Peter99 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 You're Barking up the wrong tree again Pete...everyone knows thats 'Hound Dog' Soul
Funky Si Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 There are two possible explanations: It is simply a shorthand way of people who like their "modern" done traditional (anything that's not 60s, but no chart hits) to get together to share their perverse interestIt is a trap laid by the soul police special branch divi detection unit to lure recent converts to all things rare &/or northern into displaying their ignorance of the playlists of various DJs at Wigan/Stafford/wherever "back in the day"
Guest Beeks Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 No it doesn't. nearly though.. Jayne.x Well thats my blueprint...any sub catagories of sub catagories will be duly ignored
ChrisOD1964 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Can we do old dogs and new dogs? do cats have cat years like dogs have dog years??? chris
Sjclement Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 do cats have cat years like dogs have dog years??? chris My northern soul top 500 is a bit 'dog yeared' now
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 I reckon Beeks should maybe paws for thought occasionally
SteveM Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 I reckon Beeks should maybe paws for thought occasionally Maybe hold his (dis)temper ?
Zed1 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 i thought it might be a sound which contains a rhythmic back-beat which came to being in the late 60s with a complimentry bass riff which itself evolved into 'disco' during the 70s... but... with this rhythmic back-beat and complimentary bass riff there has to be an ingredient of 'soul', i.e. vocal melody or harmonies etc. etc. if that makes sense, a modern oldie may mean any sound containing the afore that has been played out on the scene whether from 70s, 80s, 90, or this century which may leave the field open from the carstairs to kenny thomas. There are 2 possible answers to the above Mick....... 1: Have you been at the Sherry again? 2: Has this guy stolen your password?...
Guest Gavin Page Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 ok...here goes...R&B, Oldies, Crossover, Modern and new(Not Nu) soul I think that covers everything no? Jazz?
Guest Gavin Page Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Dean Anderson when he was at School? Sorry Dean if you are reading this
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 60's newies? Kinnell Steve that very short post will really blow beeks away PMSL
ChrisOD1964 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Maybe hold his (dis)temper ? thats a bit RUFF. chris
Soulacola Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 I see what you're saying...but like I said previously...why the need to call it anything at all...to me my catagorisation is more about the style of music...R&B, 60s sounds like 60s...70s the same...contemporary...and my version of modern(newer stuff) all have their own distinctive sounds...surely that's far less complicated? i think the least complicated way to catagorize it is music from one generation back. its about music that the LATEST generation of artists are influenced by but consider a predecessor.
John Benson Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Yeah, I sort of go with that. They are all great oldies. God I hate these banners. ITS EITHER FECKIN SOUL OR IT ISN'T... END OF That's just what I was thinking Gav... It gets so complicated when we start pigeon holing things Why don't we all call it 'Just soul' and leave it at that!
Coops Posted October 27, 2008 Author Posted October 27, 2008 There are 2 possible answers to the above Mick....... 1: Have you been at the Sherry again? 2: Has this guy stolen your password?... that'll be the sherry then! i'd like to thank all contibuters to this threat, it was a question asked in ernest and answered in many, many ways BUT you have all helped to clear the mud. thank you.
Fdsoul6345789 Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Yeah, I sort of go with that. They are all great oldies. God I hate these banners. ITS EITHER FECKIN SOUL OR IT ISN'T... END OF I agree with that comment absofeckinlutely mate. Keep well amigo se ya in April best regards Fraser. fdsoul6345789
MarkWhiteley Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 i'd like to thank all contibuters to this threat, it was a question asked in ernest and answered in many, many ways BUT you have all helped to clear the mud. thank you.
Dylan Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 nothing to do with when the record was made more about how much exposure its had on the modern scene IMO. so an 80s record could have been hammered and be widely known so thats a modern oldie and a 70s track can have been recentlky discovered a therefor a modern newie. Even though its the older of the 2 thats how I see it anyway....
Guest gordon russell Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 ...should be based on the style of music...like when everyone clears the floor when 70s comes on in a nighter...you know what it is straight away(shite) pmsl
Guest mel brat Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Charles Johnson and Larry Houston et.al. are "Modern oldies". How difficult can it be?
Cunnie Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Charles Johnson and Larry Houston et.al. are "Modern oldies". How difficult can it be? Are they though? Both records quoted were first played at Wigan by Richard Searling so don't that make them Northern
Guest mel brat Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 Are they though? Both records quoted were first played at Wigan by Richard Searling so don't that make them Northern No.
Guest KEN-SOUL Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 I reckon Beeks should maybe paws for thought occasionally this is all becoming a bit of a dogs dinner! wher is the soul police when you need them?
Pete Eccles Posted October 27, 2008 Posted October 27, 2008 this is all becoming a bit of a dogs dinner! wher is the soul police when you need them? In the doghouse
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!