Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22
  • Views 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Most active in this topic

Posted Images

Posted (edited)

Are the matrix details the EXACT same on both copies?

I did some close comparisons of the printing style in your scans. Check out the pictures below. Everything above the red lines is taken from the copy without arranger credits, and everything below the red lines is taken from the copy with arranger credits. It looks as if the label on the copy with arranger credits has been copied and the edges of the text are a bit bloated/blurred. Not that it proves anything, but it's interesting to see two copies scanned with the same scanner side by side.

post-1392-1220554587_thumb.jpg post-1392-1220554595_thumb.jpg post-1392-1220554603_thumb.jpg

Edited by Sebastian
Posted

HERES THE OTHE COPY :rolleyes:

you and a lot of other people are probably right. but for me and maybe only for me is the information that the copy with the aranger under the band title acouple of months after the 300 copies of them without the aranger were pressed are reason enough still to be after a copy without and counting this one to the 2nd press. but as i stated.....just for me! no attack and no try to soil your selling.

Posted

you and a lot of other people are probably right. but for me and maybe only for me is the information that the copy with the aranger under the band title acouple of months after the 300 copies of them without the aranger were pressed are reason enough still to be after a copy without and counting this one to the 2nd press. but as i stated.....just for me! no attack and no try to soil your selling.

what would you call it then

Posted (edited)

be safe by the German EMI , SUPPOSEDLY NEVER RELEASED, pic sleeve, different mix, better version, ON VINYL NOT STYRENE, copy like mine...oops

there is only one of them turned up... and Its in me play box........haha

never mind I will be selling it to Ted in 5 minutes....eh Tedward??

John just sell the one without credits if you are sure its original..dont worry what others say

we know there are copys from 75 with ARRANGER CREDITS

GASHER

Edited by GASHER
Posted

be safe by the German EMI , SUPPOSEDLY NEVER RELEASED, pic sleeve, different mix, better version, ON VINYL NOT STYRENE, copy like mine...oops

there is only one of them turned up... and Its in me play box........haha

never mind I will be selling it to Ted in 5 minutes....eh Tedward??

John just sell the one without credits if you are sure its original..dont worry what others say

we know there are copys from 75 with ARRANGER CREDITS

GASHER

Im suprised you have any left mate :lol::rolleyes:

Posted

what would you call it then

for me it is even not the first press then, but i know, if i would be always be that strong with the presses, than i couldn´t even not play out a l.allen press instead of a larry allen or sometimes not a west coast press of an as first on the west coast pressed record or even not an issue of which were also made dj-copies before......i don´t know what it is, but i had a couple of times the chance to buy a "mixed emotions ORIGINAL with arranger shown" but i always had the feeling with this record "no, thanks...it´s not original". but that was probably always of the long discussions about it which makes me willing to go 100% sure. anyway, i have this feeling now, with a lot of records of those "later" presses which excists and who knows, it´s maybe another kind of MIXED EMOTIONS

btw.....anyone has an ORIGINAL (without the arranger shown :rolleyes: ) for sale? - pm me!

Posted

be safe by the German EMI , SUPPOSEDLY NEVER RELEASED, pic sleeve, different mix, better version, ON VINYL NOT STYRENE, copy like mine...oops

there is only one of them turned up... and Its in me play box........haha

never mind I will be selling it to Ted in 5 minutes....eh Tedward??

John just sell the one without credits if you are sure its original..dont worry what others say

we know there are copys from 75 with ARRANGER CREDITS

GASHER

the german press can´t be a first press, but it´s surley its rarest form (but who cares :lol::rolleyes: )

Posted

for me it is even not the first press then, but i know, if i would be always be that strong with the presses, than i couldn´t even not play out a l.allen press instead of a larry allen or sometimes not a west coast press of an as first on the west coast pressed record or even not an issue of which were also made dj-copies before......i don´t know what it is, but i had a couple of times the chance to buy a "mixed emotions ORIGINAL with arranger shown" but i always had the feeling with this record "no, thanks...it´s not original". but that was probably always of the long discussions about it which makes me willing to go 100% sure. anyway, i have this feeling now, with a lot of records of those "later" presses which excists and who knows, it´s maybe another kind of MIXED EMOTIONS

btw.....anyone has an ORIGINAL (without the arranger shown :lol: ) for sale? - pm me!

John has now you've screwed his post :rolleyes:

Posted

Yep I agree, i did not SAY IT WAS A FIRST PRESS.. but at least YOU CANT ARGUE ITS AUTHENTICITY? :rolleyes:

IS WHAT i WAS TALKIN ABOOT. :yes:

AND I CARE....THANKS FOR ASKING laugh.gif:P

GASHER :)

the german press can´t be a first press, but it´s surley its rarest form (but who cares :lol::lol: )

Posted

Are the matrix details the EXACT same on both copies?

I did some close comparisons of the printing style in your scans. Check out the pictures below. Everything above the red lines is taken from the copy without arranger credits, and everything below the red lines is taken from the copy with arranger credits. It looks as if the label on the copy with arranger credits has been copied and the edges of the text are a bit bloated/blurred. Not that it proves anything, but it's interesting to see two copies scanned with the same scanner side by side.

post-1392-1220554587_thumb.jpg post-1392-1220554595_thumb.jpg post-1392-1220554603_thumb.jpg

Don't think that proves anything Sebastian, just less ink in the printer for one copy over the other.

Posted (edited)

Don't think that proves anything Sebastian, just less ink in the printer for one copy over the other.

I agree, and I wrote that as well in my initial post.

But it would still be interesting to know if the matrix details are the exact same on both copies.

Edited by Sebastian
This is the Sales Forum
Use the site PM (personal message) system for any trading discussion

Get involved with Soul Source

Add your comments now

Join Soul Source

A free & easy soul music affair!

Join Soul Source now!

Log in to Soul Source

Jump right back in!

Log in now!

Source Advert





×
×
  • Create New...