Guest andyrattigan Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Was this ever booted? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
45cellar Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 (edited) Was this ever booted? Yes, or a re-issue, I will try to find it and scan. It's in one of my early record boxes, haven't been in for a while. Edited April 30, 2008 by 45cellar Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
pikeys dog Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 Boot is a black and white label, on styrene. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
45cellar Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 (edited) A bit rushed as I am going to work in half an hour. This is an Original White DEMO. Strange one this, as the "PLUG SIDE" (PART II) Has the "-X" which denotes the "B Side" with a Monarch. (Delta # 73035 = August / September 1968) ORIGINAL DEMO - STYRENE MONARCH (All of the Marks are within 180 Degrees of the Deadwax). -"UA-140495-RE" "MONARCH STAMP" "Delta # 73035-X" -"UA-140494" "MONARCH STAMP" "Delta # 73035" I will search my other copy out on White DEMO. Edited May 1, 2008 by 45cellar Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted April 30, 2008 Share Posted April 30, 2008 This is the big thick paper label demo from the left 1278J upside down then UB 140494 then a circle with an S in. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 (edited) And another from Mangomn2003 sadly I cant enlarge it but the credits are different from the other 2 copies. Edited May 1, 2008 by Prophonics 2029 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
45cellar Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 (edited) And another from Mangomn2003 sadly I cant enlarge it but the credits are different from the other 2 copies. Here it is enlarged. - Mangomn2003This is the big thick paper label demo from the left 1278J upside down then UB 140494 then a circle with an S in. A bit rushed as I am going to work in half an hour. This is an Original White DEMO. Strange one this, as the "PLUG SIDE" (PART II) Has the "-X" which denotes the "B Side" with a Monarch. (Delta # 73035 = August / September 1968) ORIGINAL DEMO - STYRENE MONARCH (All of the Marks are within 180 Degrees of the Deadwax). -"UA-140495-RE" "MONARCH STAMP" "Delta # 73035-X" -"UA-140494" "MONARCH STAMP" "Delta # 73035" I will search my other copy out on White DEMO. Edited May 1, 2008 by 45cellar Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
45cellar Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 (edited) This is the big thick paper label demo from the left 1278J upside down then UB 140494 then a circle with an S in. And another from Mangomn2003 sadly I cant enlarge it but the credits are different from the other 2 copies. Thanks for Posting these, I hadn't seen your copy of the Thick Paper one before. The Other one, (I wonder what the Matrix Marks are), I haven't seen that one before, either. I have Enlarged them all in the Previous Post to compare. Edited May 1, 2008 by 45cellar Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
cloth ears Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Neil Jones had an issue for sale 2 weeks ago , never seen one before! Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 The issue looks great so much colour, so what is the boot like we are all desperate to see one. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Matt Male Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 (edited) so what is the boot like we are all desperate to see one. Always assumed this was a boot, but it might be the reissue. It's on vinyl. It's a clearer print than it looks on the photo. Edited May 1, 2008 by Matt Male Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 What's it say in the dead wax, looks ok abit more 70ts. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Matt Male Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 What's it say in the dead wax, looks ok abit more 70ts. It's scratched in K - 8489 and UA - 2726 - Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Suppose that means the only thing is to get the rulers out and measure the cut to see if its off the master plates, but it could be from the master tapes. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 I'll Ask Steve If He Knows Anything But It's More Likely To Be Some Issue Within United Artist At the Time That Had Nothing To Do With Him. Besides "Breakaway" Steve Used Jimmy On A Pepsi Jingle And On Two Songs In The Soundtrack Of "What Do You Say To A Naked Lady" A Feature Length Film Version Of Allen Funt's Candid Camera. On My Copy Pictured Above It Has UA - 140494 (On Part 1 Side) and 140495 -RC 5 (on The plug Side) Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest andyrattigan Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Always assumed this was a boot, but it might be the reissue. It's on vinyl. It's a clearer print than it looks on the photo. IT MUST BE THE BOOT. I HAVE THE RE-ISSUE AND ITS GOT THE UA LOGO WITH UNITED ARTISTS UNDERNEATH. THE REISSUE HAS 1968 AS THE PRODUCTION DATE ON THE RECORD BUT WAS IT REISSUED THE SAME YEAR AS THE ORGINAL RELEASE? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 IT MUST BE THE BOOT. I HAVE THE RE-ISSUE AND ITS GOT THE UA LOGO WITH UNITED ARTISTS UNDERNEATH. THE REISSUE HAS 1968 AS THE PRODUCTION DATE ON THE RECORD BUT WAS IT REISSUED THE SAME YEAR AS THE ORGINAL RELEASE? I Wouldn't Imagine That It Was. Just Reading A Letter That Steve Wrote To Me In 1986 And As He Recalls It: "Unfortunately, The Record Never Sold. UA Put It Out As A Freebee From General Motors, Didn't Promote It, And It Just Died." So It Seems Unlikely To Have Been Reissued In The Same Year. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Pete S Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 IT MUST BE THE BOOT. I HAVE THE RE-ISSUE AND ITS GOT THE UA LOGO WITH UNITED ARTISTS UNDERNEATH. THE REISSUE HAS 1968 AS THE PRODUCTION DATE ON THE RECORD BUT WAS IT REISSUED THE SAME YEAR AS THE ORGINAL RELEASE? I think thats a legitimate press. Gary Lewis was done at exactly the same time. Late 74 or early 75. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
pikeys dog Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Further to what I said earlier, I seem to think the Boot has the 1970s block style UA logo. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
45cellar Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 (edited) Further to what I said earlier, I seem to think the Boot has the 1970s block style UA logo. Here's the one that I have, Could be a Re-Issue I suppose. As it is White & Black rather than the usual Biege I assumed that it was a Re-Issue or ? It is from a box that I hadn't been in for a while, I thought that it said DEMO on it somewhere. STYRENE - Deadwax = "K-8490-------------------UA-2727-" Edited May 1, 2008 by 45cellar Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Here's the one that I have, Could be a Re-Issue I suppose. As it is White & Black rather than the usual Biege I assumed that it was a Re-Issue or ? It is from a box that I hadn't been in for a while, I thought that it said DEMO on it somewhere. STYRENE - Deadwax = "K-8490-------------------UA-2727-" Yeah, This One Is definitely more of the 70's style, in fact I think that UA had moved there operation out to Los Angeles by then. Because My Promo Has Them Still Listed In New York. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 IT MUST BE THE BOOT. I HAVE THE RE-ISSUE AND ITS GOT THE UA LOGO WITH UNITED ARTISTS UNDERNEATH. THE REISSUE HAS 1968 AS THE PRODUCTION DATE ON THE RECORD BUT WAS IT REISSUED THE SAME YEAR AS THE ORGINAL RELEASE? Hi Andy have you got a scan of your copy. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
pikeys dog Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Here's the one that I have, Could be a Re-Issue I suppose. As it is White & Black rather than the usual Biege I assumed that it was a Re-Issue or ? It is from a box that I hadn't been in for a while, I thought that it said DEMO on it somewhere. STYRENE - Deadwax = "K-8490-------------------UA-2727-" That's the one I was talking about. Always considered this to be a 100% bootleg... Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 (edited) This is the uk original which every member of the Casino (and family and freinds) bought multiple copys of on its uk genuine first release at the time ? There are more copys of this in the charity shops than ABBA 45s ? Or is this just nonsense ? Edited May 1, 2008 by mossy Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
45cellar Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 That's the one I was talking about. Always considered this to be a 100% bootleg... That was my Initial thought, unless it was some kind of re-issue, but why White & Black. The Normal Stock Copy would have been Beige. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
45cellar Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 (edited) Always assumed this was a boot, but it might be the reissue. It's on vinyl. It's a clearer print than it looks on the photo. I am aware that these are Part 1 & Part 2, besides that, These two do look similar. Just wondering if they were both Special Products, hence White & Black. and the (UA2726) / (UA2727) below the 50451 Edited May 2, 2008 by 45cellar Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Prophonics 2029 Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 Top one looks vinyl an the bottom styrene Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Jerry Hipkiss Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 I am aware that these are Part 1 & Part 2, besides that, These two do look similar. Just wondering if they were both Special Products, hence White & Black. and the (UA2726) / (UA2727) below the 50451 Never seen that "Special Products" one before - I always assumed that the lower one was a legal repress for the NS market, but as we all know assumptions are dangerous things! Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 It Took A Minute To Find This Thread... But I Was Correct. Steve Hasn't A Clue As To Why The Demo Credits Vary From Being Fully Written Out As Arranged & Produced By Steve Karmen Or The The Alternate Abbreviation Arr. & Prod. By Steve Karmen. And Much To My Delight I Found The Polaroid Pictures That He Has Hanging Outside His Office With He And Jimmy During A Pepsi Soda Jingle Session. Looks Like They Were Having A Brilliant Time Too. He Also Sent Me One Of His Mint Copies Of The Issue And Yes The Colours On The Issue Are Quite Nice... Just Like The One Up For Sale Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Ian Dewhirst Posted May 17, 2008 Share Posted May 17, 2008 I am aware that these are Part 1 & Part 2, besides that, These two do look similar. Just wondering if they were both Special Products, hence White & Black. and the (UA2726) / (UA2727) below the 50451 I think that the Special Products one was a legitimate re-pressing probably done by Soussan in '74/'75 ish. I found about 200 copies of the re-press in an L.A. thrift store in '76, so I can only presume that they were done in L.A. and the over-pressings were dumped......... Ian D Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Harry Crosby Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 I think that the Special Products one was a legitimate re-pressing probably done by Soussan in '74/'75 ish. I found about 200 copies of the re-press in an L.A. thrift store in '76, so I can only presume that they were done in L.A. and the over-pressings were dumped......... Ian D Come on then anyone remember what it was covered up as? great title Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Koolkat Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 Come on then anyone remember what it was covered up as? great title Black Ship To Hell.......Johnny Adams Band...... Or sumthing like that. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Harry Crosby Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 Black Ship To Hell.......Johnny Adams Band...... Or sumthing like that. Yeh great title, i thought it was james lewis though, might be wrong please correct me so i know Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Harry Crosby Posted May 18, 2008 Share Posted May 18, 2008 Yeh great title, i thought it was james lewis though, might be wrong please correct me so i know Apologies james lewis c/up was lou pride Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!