Guest rigs28 Posted March 3, 2008 Posted March 3, 2008 can anyone tell me if this is an original or a boot?
Pete S Posted March 3, 2008 Posted March 3, 2008 can anyone tell me if this is an original or a boot? A million percent BOOT
Guest rigs28 Posted March 3, 2008 Posted March 3, 2008 A million percent BOOT thanks for that.just bought it on ebay advertised as original.not paid yet.
Pete S Posted March 4, 2008 Posted March 4, 2008 thanks for that.just bought it on ebay advertised as original.not paid yet. I saw that mate, nearly emailed the seller but then thought - well maybe it should be the prospetcive buyers who should do the research because the seller certainly doesn't care if he sells a pressing as an original
Jim G Posted March 4, 2008 Posted March 4, 2008 To support your claim on Ebayh the one below is in the current JM Auction
Mark Bicknell Posted March 4, 2008 Posted March 4, 2008 Came out on Valise same number 6900 two designs thick vinyl light red label as on JM's auction and thiner vinyl deep red label as my example here, big difference in the book value £750.00 thick and £450.00 thin, fantastic record whichever the copy. Hope this helps you, the copy you posted as Pete stated is a bootleg for sure. Regards - Mark Bicknell.
Guest Dan Posted March 4, 2008 Posted March 4, 2008 I disagree with Pete. It's actually a five million per cent boot. Incidentally, following Mark's post, I've got both the boot and a proper one and my proper one is a much darker red but also quite thick vinyl. Maybe there are three proper ones Mark?
Barry Posted March 9, 2008 Posted March 9, 2008 Mine has an almost wine coloured label - crimson almost. I think the £400+ valuation is a bit steep. Am I wrong?
Guest Posted March 9, 2008 Posted March 9, 2008 (edited) Came out on Valise same number 6900 two designs thick vinyl light red label as on JM's auction and thiner vinyl deep red label as my example here, big difference in the book value £750.00 thick and £450.00 thin, fantastic record whichever the copy. Hope this helps you, the copy you posted as Pete stated is a bootleg for sure. Regards - Mark Bicknell. Mark, I found 300 or more, of that design in the Carolinas in the late 70s but we sold out in less than 2 years. So that design isn't particually rare, elusivity is caused by collectors quite rightly keeping them, it sells really well when comes to market. But the thick vinyl New York FIRST PRESS is decidedly tough to find, can't have had more than 3 of them in my life. To view the rare first press follow this link: https://www.raresoulman.co.uk/rarest-of-the-rare/27 To my knowledge there are only the two authentic presses. John Edited March 9, 2008 by john manship
45cellar Posted March 9, 2008 Posted March 9, 2008 (edited) Mark, I found 300 or more, of that design in the Carolinas in the late 70s but we sold out in less than 2 years. So that design isn't particually rare, elusivity is caused by collectors quite rightly keeping them, it sells really well when comes to market. But the thick vinyl New York FIRST PRESS is decidedly tough to find, can't have had more than 3 of them in my life. To view the rare first press follow this link: https://www.raresoulman.co.uk/rarest-of-the-rare/27 To my knowledge there are only the two authentic presses. John Hi John Here is the First Press, I bought it from Soul Bowl Mentioned as Rarer Thick/Heavy Vinyl copy in the Listing back then too. Considering the amount of Rare stuff on the Soul Bowl lists back then, It must have been considered Quite rare at the time, back in the 70's. Edited March 9, 2008 by 45cellar
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!