Mike Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Recently may have read the reports of Levine in the last issue of manifesto trying to rewrite history Seems this month in part 2 of his interview he's now trying to rewrite soul source moderating decsions No desire to make the past closure of an ex-member account an issue or whatever, I had considered this matter closed, however as what levine said is pure out and out sh*te and as published in the real world have got no other option but to put the record straight manifesto quote "Who do these people on Soul Source think they are any way ? How can they ban someone like Simon White simply for standing his ground ? Simon doesn't just paint one side, he tries to see it from all points of view and to ban him I think is heinous just because he doesn't agree with the majority of anally retentive anarchic puritanical posters on there" meanwhile in the real world simon whites account was closed as per below https://www.soul-source.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=47283 latest in a long line of sh*t stirring against this site by levine have to laugh
Steve G Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Sam tells me he's also described Soul Sourcers as "anally retentive and puritanical" If true I've only got two avataars to describe this latest irrelevant outburst:
Guest Bogue Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Got to say, i enjoyed Simon Whites posts in the main, seemed a nice bloke & i was quite shocked when he was ejected. That said, i don't think the mods were left with much option at the time ! He seemed a bit out of sorts with a few others also, maybe he was having a bad time ? If he wanted to come back on how about another chance ? Feck all to do with IL though.
Guest Stuart T Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 "Who do these people on Soul Source think they are any way ? How can they ban someone like Simon White simply for standing his ground ? Simon doesn't just paint one side, he tries to see it from all points of view and to ban him I think is heinous just because he doesn't agree with the majority of anally retentive anarchic puritanical posters on there" Hes off again is he? I'm pretty sure he dumped a few people off ANS for "standing their ground". "Anally retentive" means many things to many people, in Ian's case I suspect it means "They don't think I'm wonderful". Well sorry Ian, I for one don't. Shall we have a poll?
Tomangoes Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 I thought Ian Levine was concentrating on music production? He must read this forum then to form an opinion. It must be terrible to crave fame and acceptance only to find that its replaced by ridicule and rejection. A bit like a Soap Star who gets written out of the show because they thought they were bigger than they were. Ed
mischief Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 I've been many things but never a "anally retentive anarchic puritanical " before.. well don't think I have
Pete S Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 "Who do these people on Soul Source think they are any way ? Does Ian really think that Soul Source has any influence on the great scheme of things? It's approximately the same 50 regulars talking about records and venues, that's all. Hardly threatening to anyone really.
Little-stevie Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 Does Ian really think that Soul Source has any influence on the great scheme of things? It's approximately the same 50 regulars talking about records and venues, that's all. Hardly threatening to anyone really. Not sure about that Pete...Yes we only see a small number who post but i have many freinds who are on here every day but never post,they still read all the topics..They just aint aint attention seeking loudmouths like you and me but they all count just the same...I would say that for the 50 that post there are 1,000 or more who read as much but don't post....
Guest Bogue Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) Not sure about that Pete...Yes we only see a small number who post but i have many freinds who are on here every day but never post,they still read all the topics..They just aint aint attention seeking loudmouths like you and me but they all count just the same...I would say that for the 50 that post there are 1,000 or more who read as much but don't post.... It's just a PMT problem he has at the moment mate , read it in one of the other threads ! Edited September 7, 2007 by Bogue
Pete S Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 Not sure about that Pete...Yes we only see a small number who post but i have many freinds who are on here every day but never post,they still read all the topics..They just aint aint attention seeking loudmouths like you and me but they all count just the same...I would say that for the 50 that post there are 1,000 or more who read as much but don't post.... But it's what gets posted that he/they get upset about Steve
Gert Mark Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 Why do people ie Radio shows, Mags etc give time and space to someone who clearly has delusions of grandeur which arent recipricated from the listeners/buyers ? Its like a tabloid style slow motion car crash, he was relevent 30 years ago, not today. Giving him publicity just shows that these mags/shows are starting to become irrelevent to todays soul scene, as with everything the internet is taking over. IMHO Gert Roach.
TOAD Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 KEEP THE INSULTS COMING LEVINE FIRST A COCKROACH AND " WHAT EVER" NEXT BOYCOTT HIS CD LOL
Guest eddyg Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 who buys his cds anyway the bloke is a tosser
Billywhizz Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 Hes off again is he? I'm pretty sure he dumped a few people off ANS for "standing their ground". "Anally retentive" means many things to many people, in Ian's case I suspect it means "They don't think I'm wonderful". Well sorry Ian, I for one don't. Shall we have a poll? NO AFRAID NOT, STUART U STOOD UR GROUND HE STOOD HIS, THE ONLY TIME HE WENT OFF WAS AFTER THE ROCKET ALL-NIGHTERS, HE JUST MISSED HIS NIGHT SLEEP LOL BILLY
Guest Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) Got to say, i enjoyed Simon Whites posts in the main, seemed a nice bloke & i was quite shocked when he was ejected. That said, i don't think the mods were left with much option at the time ! He seemed a bit out of sorts with a few others also, maybe he was having a bad time ? If he wanted to come back on how about another chance ? Feck all to do with IL though. Simon White Nice bloke? Offensive e-mails, attempting to destroy someone's reputation and making serious efforts to interfere with that persons contracted work. I don't think so. He was also kicked off another forum due to his behaviour , so he does have some previous. Good riddance Derek Edited September 7, 2007 by blackwhite
Guest Matt Male Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 Hes off again is he? I'm pretty sure he dumped a few people off ANS for "standing their ground". So true, pretty much everybody alternated between being his best mate and his worst enemy on ANS depending on Ian's mood at the time. I remember after a verbal savaging once i posted up a glowing review of The Rocket and suddenly i was his blue eyed boy. ANS was a good laugh though. I hear it's back?
Chalky Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) He's had a beef about Soul Source since he was thrown off Mike's original Soul Talk e-mail list by us then mods years ago. He then went on to set up his own "rival" e-mail list ANS. Have I missed a letter out somewhere Edited September 7, 2007 by chalky
Guest Bogue Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 Simon White Nice bloke? Offensive e-mails, attempting to destroy someone's reputation and making serious efforts to interfere with that persons contracted work. I don't think so. He was also kicked off another forum due to his behaviour , so he does have some previous. Good riddance Derek I don't really know the in's & out's of the personal spat that he was involved in Derek, nor the previous you mention, was just commenting how i generally enjoyed his postings before he was banned. & in the main he entered most threads in good spirit . As i said though, i did think he left the site with no other option when he was banned, just wondered if the good out weighed the bad & he deserved another chance ? That's assuming he want's it in the first place ?
Guest Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 I don't really know the in's & out's of the personal spat that he was involved in Derek, nor the previous you mention, was just commenting how i generally enjoyed his postings before he was banned. & in the main he entered most threads in good spirit . As i said though, i did think he left the site with no other option when he was banned, just wondered if the good out weighed the bad & he deserved another chance ? That's assuming he want's it in the first place ? It's amazing we have such different views of his contribution while he was a member. He always struck me as being an A grade shit-stirrer. Derek
Guest Paul Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 It's amazing we have such different views of his contribution while he was a member. He always struck me as being an A grade shit-stirrer. Derek That's odd, Derek, because the Simon White I know is friendly and good natured, although his musical taste leaves a lot to be desired sometimes (joke). Simon was an important part of this community and made many contributions. Whatever happened, there are two (or more) sides to every story. Paul Mooney
Wiganer1 Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 Simon White Nice bloke? Offensive e-mails, attempting to destroy someone's reputation and making serious efforts to interfere with that persons contracted work. I don't think so. He was also kicked off another forum due to his behaviour , so he does have some previous. Good riddance Derek ===== this isnt the Simon White i know,,one of the nicest guys ive ever met..
Tsu Tomatoes Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 ...I would say that for the 50 that post there are 1,000 or more who read as much but don't post.... I would post more, but everyone's ''anally retentive anarchic puritanical'' attitude bores me
Guest Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 ===== this isnt the Simon White i know,,one of the nicest guys ive ever met.. Well that's what he get's up to these days. Derek
Guest rachel Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 (edited) Can't really see the point in arguing over different people's view of someone's personality. The link Mike posted in the first post has the explanation of why Simon White's account was closed, which was because of his actions, not, as claimed in the article, because of his opinions. Edited September 8, 2007 by rachel
Chris L Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 Why do people ie Radio shows, Mags etc give time and space to someone who clearly has delusions of grandeur which arent recipricated from the listeners/buyers ? Whatever the reasons they still do Its like a tabloid style slow motion car crash, he was relevent 30 years ago, not today. Could you explain what you mean with some being "relevant". Who do you feel is "relevant" in today's soul scene ? Gert Roach.
Chris L Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 ===== this isnt the Simon White i know,,one of the nicest guys ive ever met.. Me too, there must a couple of people impersonating him, I've always found him a mild mannered Clark Kent sort of guy. Chris L
Billywhizz Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 Can't really see the point in arguing over different people's view of someone's personality. The link Mike posted in the first post has the explanation of why Simon White's account was closed, which was because of his actions, not, as claimed in the article, because of his opinions. spot on rachel,will u marry me. Billy
Soulsmith Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 Me too, there must a couple of people impersonating him, I've always found him a mild mannered Clark Kent sort of guy. Chris L Yep, me too. But what happens is this..........as Clark Kent he dashes into a phone box, where upon he finds a key board and there evolves into a Mr.Hyde persona.
Steve G Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 That's odd, Derek, because the Simon White I know is friendly and good natured, although his musical taste leaves a lot to be desired sometimes (joke). Paul Mooney You certainly got that bit right Paul - I see he is now reviewing The Glitter Band in Manifesto What next Mud and Showaddywaddy records in their strange world of northern soul?
Chris L Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 Yep, me too. But what happens is this..........as Clark Kent he dashes into a phone box, where upon he finds a key board and there evolves into a Mr.Hyde persona. Don't ya just hate that when they do that.........................
Guest rachel Posted September 9, 2007 Posted September 9, 2007 spot on rachel,will u marry me. Billy As long as you do the housework, and I can spend all the money on vinyl.
Billywhizz Posted September 9, 2007 Posted September 9, 2007 As long as you do the housework, and I can spend all the money on vinyl. ok speak to u offline
Guest Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 Having read both articles and thought about them, not too deeply I hasten to add and then going and spending some money on the Angelo Starr single, £8 for a new single !!!!! it was crap. I think Mr Levine should stick to boy bands .... Also ... having read Soul Sam's answers to Mr Levines comments, I must applaude Sam for his uncharacteristic reserv. I don't normally like his style of writing or his content but fair do's he kept the higher moral ground. Also...... who the hell dressed Mr Levine ? did they just turn up on his doorstep t do the pictures???
Keithw Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 whatever people think about Ian just remember the new releases he played at the Mecca etc have gone a long way to prepare the thing we call modern soul/x-over he knows more about 70s groups,re line ups,who sang with who etc than anyone i know with pahaps the exception of john smith and a few others and as for Simon White ive always found him a realy nice person
Mike Posted September 18, 2007 Author Posted September 18, 2007 whatever people think about Ian just remember the new releases he played at the Mecca etc have gone a long way to prepare the thing we call modern soul/x-over he knows more about 70s groups,re line ups,who sang with who etc than anyone i know with pahaps the exception of john smith and a few others and as for Simon White ive always found him a realy nice person so what that make it ok for levine to shit stir and openly lie about this place yeah ? you giving him a big thumbs up as well for that yep ? as for ex-members you can read what he did on here no one forced him to do such, his account was closed for his actions nothing mor enothing less
Soulsmith Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 whatever people think about Ian just remember the new releases he played at the Mecca etc have gone a long way to prepare the thing we call modern soul/x-over he knows more about 70s groups,re line ups,who sang with who etc than anyone i know with pahaps the exception of john smith and a few others I'd agree with Mike The Mecca was 30 yrs ago. Never went myself though choice. If there is any debt of gratitude its to the artists/arrangers/producers/label owners who without getting too flowery, produced the goods & enriched our lives. Being a DJ is quite frankly just a lucky break. Just about any moron could pull that off.
Steve G Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 he knows more about 70s groups,re line ups,who sang with who etc than anyone i know with pahaps the exception of john smith and a few others Absolute crap - we need to be introduced if you think that
chrissie Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 Sam tells me he's also described Soul Sourcers as "anally retentive and puritanical" If true I've only got two avataars to describe this latest irrelevant outburst: Puritanical.................obviously not read my "look at your box thread" He must read this forum then to form an opinion. Ed and then obviously does just the opposite Does Ian really think that Soul Source has any influence on the great scheme of things? It's approximately the same 50 regulars talking about records and venues, that's all. Hardly threatening to anyone really. and don't forget the bollox we talk as well KEEP THE INSULTS COMING LEVINE FIRST A COCKROACH AND " WHAT EVER" NEXT BOYCOTT HIS CD LOL Not sure if I was happier being a cockroach ok speak to u offline Congtratulations QoFxx
Steve G Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 Puritanical.................obviously not read my "look at your box thread" and then obviously does just the opposite and don't forget the bollox we talk as well Not sure if I was happier being a cockroach Congtratulations QoFxx U bin on the vodka gal?
chrissie Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 U bin on the vodka gal? No vodka, a nice chilled bottle of pinot Got to keep myself awake for another couple of hours got my eye on a 99p bargain on evil bay QoFxx
Sean Hampsey Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 Absolute crap - we need to be introduced if you think that I think you might come under the "and a few others" bit Steve.
Steve G Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 I think you might come under the "and a few others" bit Steve. So I am in the "John Smith" charabank then Sean - phew! Thanks God for that Was getting worried for a few moments there
Keithw Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 so what that make it ok for levine to shit stir and openly lie about this place yeah ? you giving him a big thumbs up as well for that yep ? as for ex-members you can read what he did on here no one forced him to do such, his account was closed for his actions nothing mor enothing less I was talking about the things he knows about the soul scene artist/record wise,not anything else the thumbs up was for how i found Simon to be personally,always found him ok..my opinion of him,not anything else
ImberBoy Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 Frances Nero - Footsteps Following Me was prettttttttttttttttttttty fookin good though, oh and The Mecca ............ I like him. Gobs off a bit but he has got talent.
Sean Hampsey Posted September 18, 2007 Posted September 18, 2007 So I am in the "John Smith" charabank then Sean - phew! Thanks God for that Was getting worried for a few moments there Only Just Steve! Poor old Smithy. I knew him when he was just plain old John Smith... long before the John 'Soul' moniker! As the saying goes.... "Desperate for fame... he changed his name!" But we call him something else around these parts!
Chris L Posted September 19, 2007 Posted September 19, 2007 so what that make it ok for levine to shit stir and openly lie about this place yeah ? you giving him a big thumbs up as well for that yep ? as for ex-members you can read what he did on here no one forced him to do such, his account was closed for his actions nothing mor enothing less The truth of the matter is tht we all love Ian, think his music is tops, buy his CD's, wish we were hm, are jealous of his Superman comic collection, wished we'd DJ'd at the Mecca, Torch and others, were lucky enough to be born, etc, etc, etc.......................
TOAD Posted September 19, 2007 Posted September 19, 2007 (edited) YOUVE MISSED OUT THE PLANE SO HE COULD FLY AND GET HIS RECORDS Edited September 19, 2007 by TOAD
Steve G Posted September 19, 2007 Posted September 19, 2007 Only Just Steve! Maybe I did jump on poor old KeithW a bit too hard last night - To me (and plenty of others) groups go way beyond Motown and Motown soundalikes - and this is the area where Ian is expert. When I think groups I of course think Dells, Dramatics, Whispers, Bluenotes etc etc But I also think of names like Commands, Creations, Combinations, Inclinations, Endeavours, Enticers etc. Right across the board from northern to sweet soul. Having read loads of articles and threads over the years, there are a considerable number of people who know an awful lot about groups - for example excluding the dealers - the S Yorks posse (you lot - including John "Soul" Smith in exile), Eddie Hubbard, Tony R, Ady C, D Pearson up in Bratfud, Chalks, D Welding, Butch, Kitch, Rob Thomas, Rixy, Rimmer, some Americans, Terry Davis, David Cole, Dave Porter, Fraser Dunn, Mark Bicknell, Dave Halsall, Paul Thrower, Richard, Paul Phillips and on and on. Nobody knows it all, but a lot of people know quite a bit if that makes sense. Anyway I've calmed down now, so having been slightly more articulate than last night, I will leave this thread alone. Steve
Soulsmith Posted September 19, 2007 Posted September 19, 2007 Frances Nero - Footsteps Following Me was prettttttttttttttttttttty fookin good though, oh and The Mecca ............ I like him. Gobs off a bit but he has got talent. Sure is a good record. But most of the other stuff should be filed under 'Crimes against music". If he has a talent its for "gobbing off"
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!