Prophonics 2029 Posted September 4, 2007 Posted September 4, 2007 (edited) Can anyone help with this, The Moments on Deep came out twice, some body said to me that they were different mixes or a shorter version, I know the B-sides differ but is this true. Edited September 4, 2007 by Prophonics 2026
Corbett80 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 Hope the shorter one dosen't lose that excellent vocal performance from the playout......
Prophonics 2029 Posted September 5, 2007 Author Posted September 5, 2007 (edited) Hope the shorter one dosen't lose that excellent vocal performance from the playout...... Think that's what he said it did, he's a DJ from near Wigan can't remember his name Richard Serlings mate with great records. Edited September 5, 2007 by Prophonics 2026
Corbett80 Posted September 5, 2007 Posted September 5, 2007 God thats the best bit! You'd definitely need the longer take....
Prophonics 2029 Posted September 5, 2007 Author Posted September 5, 2007 Hang on a mo, The Deep top has 2.24 the Deep bottom has 2.29 so dose this mean that he all know the crap short version?
Chalky Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Its the ending where she holds the note for what seems an age thats missing I think on one. I have it on a tape from years ago where that bit is missing.
Guest Trevski Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 (edited) Hang on a mo, The Deep top has 2.24 the Deep bottom has 2.29 so dose this mean that he all know the crap short version? Tony who used to run Harrogate do had a  'deep top' copy, and it deffo had the ending. maybe the 'deep bottom' has an extra bar inthe middle bit, altho' I have found that the times on labels are not always accurate, they may well turn out to be the same! The big note at the end fades to girlie backing singing "You said you love me" for two or three repeats, so that may be slightly extended on the longer one. Edited September 6, 2007 by Trevski
Wiganer1 Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 Tony who used to run Harrogate do had a 'deep top' copy, and it deffo had the ending. maybe the 'deep bottom' has an extra bar inthe middle bit, altho' I have found that the times on labels are not always accurate, they may well turn out to be the same! ===== is 'hey boy' on the b-side???
Iancsloft Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 I have DEEP DP 001 You said 2..24 with love you can,t you hear on the flip time 2..13 the copy i have the singer holds the note for ages right at the end on the copy with the Deep at the bottom there is a address 118 chauncey st Brooklyn NY The label number says TK4M 1696 On my copy with the Deep at the top the label reads DEEP underneath reads Deep Sounds Brooklyn 33 N.Y label number reads SK4M 1962 Regards Ian Cunliffe
Chalky Posted September 6, 2007 Posted September 6, 2007 two tracks above just found on PC, quick listen appear to be different.....
Prophonics 2029 Posted September 6, 2007 Author Posted September 6, 2007 (edited) There's the obvious like speed but is it also sounds like two different takes and she sounds like she has a strong accent on the You Said as against the Deep, one sounds like it's recorded in your living room and the other in a hall? Food for thought. The B-side Love You Can't Hear isn't a bad track as well and yes Wiganer Hey Boy is the other b-side. Edited September 6, 2007 by Prophonics 2026
Chalky Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 one sounds like it's recorded in your living room and the other in a hall? Food for thought. thats probably down to the quality of the mp3's. I'll see if I can find the tape.
Chalky Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 The next track is definately Deep 001 so if someone can add Deep 002 we'll know for sure.
Chalky Posted September 7, 2007 Posted September 7, 2007 listening to the three tracks I would say the second track I posted is Deep 002.....
Quinvy Posted September 10, 2007 Posted September 10, 2007 The copy on ebay looks very dodgy to me. It shows number 001 on the You Said side, and shows 003 on the Hey Boy side?????? Very strange.
boba Posted September 10, 2007 Posted September 10, 2007 The copy on ebay looks very dodgy to me. It shows number 001 on the You Said side, and shows 003 on the Hey Boy side?????? Very strange. I've seen that on records before. Sometimes labels will do the catalog number per the entire record and sometimes it will be per-side. If they reuse the exact side, I've seen the catalog number on a side reused. I didn't think the copy looked fake, plus it at least looks like a reputable seller with high feedback.
Prophonics 2029 Posted September 12, 2007 Author Posted September 12, 2007 I've seen that on records before. Sometimes labels will do the catalog number per the entire record and sometimes it will be per-side. If they reuse the exact side, I've seen the catalog number on a side reused. I didn't think the copy looked fake, plus it at least looks like a reputable seller with high feedback. lol.
Mormar44 Posted September 12, 2007 Posted September 12, 2007 The copy on ebay looks very dodgy to me. It shows number 001 on the You Said side, and shows 003 on the Hey Boy side?????? Very strange. I noticed the different numbers on the Ebay copy. Has anybody else got a copy with different numbers and are they dodgy or not? Mark
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!