August 24, 200717 yr Author Tony Smith said: 356.00 that was a bit more than i thought it'd go for.......oh well ....i'll get one .. one day
August 24, 200717 yr debc said: that was a bit more than i thought it'd go for.......oh well ....i'll get one .. one day F*cks sake, why are there no nutters on my mailing lists, I sold my copy of that for £25 and now 7 years later I wouldn't sell it for more than £50.
August 24, 200717 yr Author Pete S said: F*cks sake, why are there no nutters on my mailing lists, I sold my copy of that for £25 and now 7 years later I wouldn't sell it for more than £50. Don't suppose you got another copy going for £50 have you? I'll have it ps. and i aint a nutter
August 24, 200717 yr debc said: Don't suppose you got another copy going for £50 have you? I'll have it ps. and i aint a nutter Looks like my original suggestion on the Veep LP now seems a far more realistic option...lol just need to buy a bigger box Deb...lol Regards - Mark Bicknell.
August 24, 200717 yr Jesus! Some people really are nuts Pete as I sold mine for similar some years back. We must be getting old but hats off to JM if someone is willing to pay that price for a copy
August 24, 200717 yr debc said: Don't suppose you got another copy going for £50 have you? I'll have it ps. and i aint a nutter No it's not something I'd ever buy again because it's such a mess of a record, if I get one you'll be welcome to it. People should resist this ridiculous hyping of records which aren't rare or hard to find and use a bit of common sense. Just because a record sells for a large sum in an auction it means absolutely nothing except that two people want it badly and most people don't care if they pay 5 times the real value.
August 24, 200717 yr Author Pete S said: No it's not something I'd ever buy again because it's such a mess of a record, if I get one you'll be welcome to it. People should resist this ridiculous hyping of records which aren't rare or hard to find and use a bit of common sense. Just because a record sells for a large sum in an auction it means absolutely nothing except that two people want it badly and most people don't care if they pay 5 times the real value. when i first asked on here if anyone had one for sale i wasn't aware that it was expensive. I reckoned it would be around £30 -£50. then someone pointed me to manships auction. I personally would not pay the amount it went for nor did i say i would. Yes i want it but like i say would not pay a huge amount for it. as for being a mess of a record thats your opinion and one i didn't ask for. I simply asked what it went for on manships auction. Oh and its really not nice to call people you don't know 'nutters'.
August 24, 200717 yr debc said: when i first asked on here if anyone had one for sale i wasn't aware that it was expensive. I reckoned it would be around £30 -£50. then someone pointed me to manships auction. I personally would not pay the amount it went for nor did i say i would. Yes i want it but like i say would not pay a huge amount for it. as for being a mess of a record thats your opinion and one i didn't ask for. I simply asked what it went for on manships auction. Oh and its really not nice to call people you don't know 'nutters'. Not one word of what I said was directed at you but if you want to be paranoid that's up to you.
August 24, 200717 yr Author Pete S said: Not one word of what I said was directed at you but if you want to be paranoid that's up to you. thats alright then!
August 24, 200717 yr debc said: thats alright then! I was referring to the people who pay ridiculous prices for records in auctions which they could buy for sometimes up to 100% cheaper if they bought them set sale. And the people who pay £50 for £5 pressings. They're out there somewhere...
Can anyone tell me what this went for on JM s auction? i missed it!