Happy Feet Posted Wednesday at 20:05 Posted Wednesday at 20:05 I'm sure somebody on here said that Kent only reissue cheap records , Tommy Tate £5K+ was it meant as tongue in cheek , wonderful record . 1
Eddie Hubbard Posted Wednesday at 20:16 Posted Wednesday at 20:16 It might be rare ,but the mix on the Ko Ko ‘45 isn’t half as good as the Japanese CD or the Grapevine 2000 / Kent singles .Im my opinion of course …. 1 2
Popular Post Woodbutcher Posted Wednesday at 20:21 Author Popular Post Posted Wednesday at 20:21 2 minutes ago, Eddie Hubbard said: It might be rare ,but the mix on the Ko Ko ‘45 isn’t half as good as the Japanese CD or the Grapevine 2000 / Kent singles .Im my opinion of course …. That's part of the reason I saved myself £5176.00 and gave a tenner for Ady's release ... 4
Ian Parker Posted Wednesday at 20:46 Posted Wednesday at 20:46 The Spinners. YIKES !! thats lovely though. The Ellusions, probably the worst recording ever put on vinyl, but the vocals are so good, the sax solo is equally as good. fabulous record ! 1
Happy Feet Posted Wednesday at 20:55 Posted Wednesday at 20:55 4 minutes ago, Ian Parker said: The Spinners. YIKES !! thats lovely though. The Ellusions, probably the worst recording ever put on vinyl, but the vocals are so good, the sax solo is equally as good. fabulous record ! The crazy world of Northern Soul , could there possibly be a better take still in the can ? Doubtful
Sebastian Posted Thursday at 08:13 Posted Thursday at 08:13 (edited) 12 hours ago, Eddie Hubbard said: It might be rare ,but the mix on the Ko Ko ‘45 isn’t half as good as the Japanese CD or the Grapevine 2000 / Kent singles .Im my opinion of course …. It's not just the mix; the vocal take and guitar parts on the KoKo 45 are different takes than the modern day CD/7" "reissues". The original 45 is also missing parts of the horn arrangement and is more heavy on the guitar doing fills. There's a guitar solo between 1:47 to 2:02 that is entirely absent from the "reissued" version where that part is played by a saxophone instead. Regardless of version, it's an absolutely sublime recording! Edited Thursday at 08:44 by Sebastian 2
Blake H Posted yesterday at 09:55 Posted yesterday at 09:55 What did the Mammsells finish at please? Can’t make out the list above tia
Tony Clements Posted yesterday at 16:58 Posted yesterday at 16:58 6 hours ago, Blake H said: What did the Mammsells finish at please? Can’t make out the list above tia £313. 1
Steviehay Posted yesterday at 17:20 Posted yesterday at 17:20 jesus the price on romeo and juliet !!!
Happy Feet Posted yesterday at 19:01 Posted yesterday at 19:01 1 hour ago, Steviehay said: jesus the price on romeo and juliet !!! High or Low ?
Steviehay Posted yesterday at 19:27 Posted yesterday at 19:27 24 minutes ago, Happy Feet said: High or Low ? Way above the norm I have this and hey girl would of thought 70-80 ?? Or am I that out of touch ??
Happy Feet Posted yesterday at 19:51 Posted yesterday at 19:51 20 minutes ago, Steviehay said: Way above the norm I have this and hey girl would of thought 70-80 ?? Or am I that out of touch ?? Have seen it on discogs for much more , but that doesn't mean it's worth £300 + , I think in today's market , Promo it's probably near the mark , is it currently getting spins again ??
Steviehay Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago No idea but if this is the case need to pull some out and put in the play boxes 1
Blake H Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 5 hours ago, Tony Clements said: £313. Thank you Tony.
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!