AI re-writing the History of Northern Soul

[Paul-s]

Its now all about the algorithm rather than the rhythm....

The more you post yourself the more you become the greatest Northern Soul dancer of all time: Forget the great dancers we have all seen over the decades...

It's now more like Virtual Reality, curated online through relentless posting of the self, and you would definitely require some sort of artificial intelligence to buy into this manufactured hype. 

I'm still waiting for Kev Roberts response regarding the 'World' Northern Soul Dance Championship and what qualifies it as a 'World' event rather than a comedy event, a bit of fun..

These are the 'real world' consequences of cynical, ego driven marketing ploys such as calling it 'World' instead of 'Blackpool'  (which is what it is in reality).

Kev has now created individuals who believe in his Emperors New Clothes competition as a 'World event and consequently sell themselves (for money) as World Northern Soul Dance Champions - notably one from 2022 who never goes to nighters and started out as a YouTube NS dancing parody act - feeding the algorithm and erasing history in the process.

AI is historically illiterate and has no 'real world' connection, no visceral instinct or rhythmic capacity, no soul, no spirit, no embodied experience.

The last comment on the AI results is that NS culture  is based on word-of-mouth, yet its ridiculous rankings are generated based on who posts the most images online (Bristol appear to rank highly for some reason).

Anyway, interested in your thoughts on this?

 

 

Edited 23 hours ago by Paul-s
reposition image

[Dobber]

Wasn’t there a talented dancer chap from the casino days called sandy? I don’t see that clever AI picking his name out?

[Dobber]

And yes I agree Paul  the more and frequent you add to the internet the more the AI fancy’s you! So that proves that AI is corrupt! I wonder if a politician came up with AI

[Chalky]

Most of those on the list are fit to put the talc down for the very best the scene has offered, even by today's standards they are only average.  As you say it is nothing to do with their quality of dancing more about their social media presence, hype and others blowing smoke up their arses.

[Thinksmart]

It's not so much that AI rewrites history, it's that it doesn't have sufficient historical sources to work with in this area. The outcome though is the same, partial, often incorrect information based on incomplete, insufficient data sets.

I recently did a speech explaining the opportunities and risks of AI in the energy sector. We got AI to do all the imagery working forward through the ages of humans into the future. It's interpretation when there isn't online content, is often wonky or speculative in a sci-fi way. For example AI understood that the industrial era had water wheels but not that they needed to be at a water source such as a river. Or that in the agricultural revolution preceding that, the farmers did not wear modern tweed flat caps.  When talking about 'smart homes' it looked like product brocures in idealistic pictures we see in EV car adverts - because those are the sources it is working with.

I used the recent AI assisted Northern Soul songs in the speech live as an illustration at one point - which became the hook that got people thinking afterwards (you can see it mentioned a lot at LinkedIn).

Anything where the core knowledge is offline prior to the internet age or behind walls it cannot reach (old fora, chat groups, email groups such as the Keeping The Faith one some of us were in for example), then the AI results are often poor. Especially where this is outside official culture that has historians who have covered it. While we do have plenty of books, these likely haven't been ingested and a model trained on them. 

For Northern Soul, AI is picking up Wikipedia, news articles, social media, Youtube etc - but it doesn't have a context to refer back to that is extensive. Academic books often miss this as we know, a lot of the real knowledge in 'folk' culture isn't written or online.  As such, in future we can envisage AI to produce shallow, often incorrect or partial information from pre-internet sources that do not have biographies/historical references to align to.  What's written right now about these things at an online source that is accessible to AI, will likely become woven into the way it expresses its 'truth' in future. Getting writing folks!

Edited 18 hours ago by Thinksmart

[Kathryn Magson]

To me, AI will always look like some "plastic" creation - it will never be able to replicate the buzz that we all felt when en route to an all-nighter........ the sweat running down the walls of some grubby old cellar with the music bouncing off the walls..... that gritty atmosphere that we all remember so fondly.....walking out on a Sunday morning blinking in the sunlight (or shivering in the cold!) with the music still ringing in our ears........AI will never - ever - be able to do that!

[Chalky]

58 minutes ago, Thinksmart said:

It's not so much that AI rewrites history, it's that it doesn't have sufficient historical sources to work with in this area. The outcome though is the same, partial, often incorrect information based on incomplete, insufficient data sets.

I recently did a speech explaining the opportunities and risks of AI in the energy sector. We got AI to do all the imagery working forward through the ages of humans into the future. It's interpretation when there isn't online content, is often wonky or speculative in a sci-fi way. For example AI understood that the industrial era had water wheels but not that they needed to be at a water source such as a river. Or that in the agricultural revolution preceding that, the farmers did not wear modern tweed flat caps.  When talking about 'smart homes' it looked like product brocures in idealistic pictures we see in EV car adverts - because those are the sources it is working with.

I used the recent AI assisted Northern Soul songs in the speech live as an illustration at one point - which became the hook that got people thinking afterwards (you can see it mentioned a lot at LinkedIn).

Anything prior to the internet age where the original content was always online and not behind walls it cannot reach (old fora, chat groups, email groups such as the Keeping The Faith one some of us were in for example), then the AI results are often poor. Especially where this is outside official culture that has historians who have covered it. While we do have plenty of books, these likely haven't been ingested and a model trained on them. 

For Northern Soul, AI is picking up Wikipedia, news articles, social media, Youtube etc - but it doesn't have a context to refer back to that is extensive. Academic books often miss this as we know, a lot of the real knowledge in 'folk' culture isn't written or online.  As such, in future we can envisage AI to produce shallow, often incorrect or partial information from pre-internet sources that do not have biographies/historical references to align to.  What's written right now about these things at an online source that is accessible to AI, will likely become woven into the way it expresses its 'truth' in future. Getting writing folks!

But it’s on the internet so it must be true

[Dylan]

Keeping the lights turned on seems to be on trend right now  

 

no thanks….