Mike Posted yesterday at 08:48 Posted yesterday at 08:48 Recent discussions on planned 45 releases featuring AI generated vocals led to this poll.. Is there a place for AI being used to generate soul music vocal performances? Feel free to expand on your choice below...
Woodbutcher Posted yesterday at 08:58 Posted yesterday at 08:58 Unless Butch has found the long lost acetates of Stephen Hawking's legendary Motown sessions then it's a resounding no from me ... 3
Popular Post Shinehead Posted yesterday at 09:27 Popular Post Posted yesterday at 09:27 The human emotion of a singer is what makes it soul and that is what makes the hairs on my neck stand up and amazes me the depth a fellow human can get in to a song. However good an al record sounds it is fake and devoid of the main element a real singer. If this is the future of soul music it is reassuring that the back catalogue is vast and still new sounds to explore. 9
Happy Feet Posted yesterday at 11:05 Posted yesterday at 11:05 As has been mentioned before , a certain individual came out with " there are no more , they've all been discovered" & pursued a career of tailer mades and crap , since then approx 1975 there has been hundreds of discoveries, and as the tempo has slowed and with the acceptance of varying types of soul music , long may it stay original,. AI is just another form of tailer made surely 1
Johndelve Posted yesterday at 11:31 Posted yesterday at 11:31 AI is here to stay, no question, and it has and will have many benefits in certain walks of life. But in art/ music /entertainment ? A disaster. Ask musicians, artists, writers etc. what they think of AI when it puts them out of work.... 2
Dylan Posted yesterday at 11:37 Posted yesterday at 11:37 I think the recent batch of AI vocals could be tried out with quality soul singers and there is the opportunity to judge them again
Timbo58 Posted yesterday at 11:43 Posted yesterday at 11:43 (edited) Anything that takes away authenticity in soul music itself (or even events that play it for that matter) makes it by definition inauthentic and therefore (to my mind at least) a pastiche of what true rare soul should be -it becomes an insult to the artists and those who actually know what 'the faith' actually means. AI is about as far away from 'real' as it can possibly be. So let's leave its products to the venues with their glitter balls, disco lasers & local yokels jigging about with drinks, you know -the ones that social media repeatedly tells us are 'the soul scene'. Edited yesterday at 11:45 by Timbo58 3
Kev Cane Posted yesterday at 11:52 Posted yesterday at 11:52 10 minutes ago, Dylan said: I think the recent batch of AI vocals could be tried out with quality soul singers and there is the opportunity to judge them again And then we're going down the realms of "tailor made" Dylan, but hey ho, that's just a beef that I have with it, hope you're well Kev 2
Popular Post Clee93 Posted yesterday at 11:56 Popular Post Posted yesterday at 11:56 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Johndelve said: AI is here to stay, no question, and it has and will have many benefits in certain walks of life. But in art/ music /entertainment ? A disaster. Ask musicians, artists, writers etc. what they think of AI when it puts them out of work.... I actually don't reckon AI will ever have the capacity to challenge authentic creativity... Saw something the other day that people have already noticed when brands are using AI generated advertisement & already initially think that the company can't / won't be great and is a reflection of their business practices in general because they are too cheap to pay for an actual designer. I genuinely think it'll be seen as a novelty fad within the creative sectors. I just can't see AI being able to even begin to replicate, never mind synthesise something like Love Was So Easy by Sidney Barnes on Sids Kids. Not even due to the usual comments of lived experience etc. I just see AI being something which will benefit lots of systems within various industries that will hopefully free up a lot of monotonous day to day stuff within businesses. The less of it we see and hear on the scene, the better. Edited yesterday at 12:11 by Clee93 4
Solidsoul Posted yesterday at 13:08 Posted yesterday at 13:08 (edited) Maybe it will be good to re-engineer existing records? Take out instrumental backing sounds or vocals that detract from the song. Conversely we could add an extra chorus or an extra instrumental break? Overall I would rather it wasn't used and we just had the existing records. But as we have found out with the internet, the genie can't be put back in the bottle? Edited yesterday at 13:10 by Solidsoul 1
Hooker1951 Posted yesterday at 13:11 Posted yesterday at 13:11 If it sounds good catches the emotions touches the soul and captures the Time and spaces it tries to do Embrace it because you will never stop it, Let’s be honest it’s got a hell of a mountain to climb to match up with the real thing , but you can’t stop the future just hope it gets better n better, if it finally arrives at a good place, Music will win in the end and your imagination will do the rest Mick 2
Kev Cane Posted yesterday at 13:52 Posted yesterday at 13:52 AI records being played at a genuine soul venue will provoke a new "OVO versus CD, MP3, reissue, boot " kinda scenario, plenty of OVO about, still untapped, PVC instead of leather in my opinion Kev 1
Dylan Posted yesterday at 16:11 Posted yesterday at 16:11 (edited) 4 hours ago, Kev Cane said: And then we're going down the realms of "tailor made" Dylan, but hey ho, that's just a beef that I have with it, hope you're well Kev I’m well mate and appreciate both sides of the argument regarding these recent tracks. I just think a couple of them are pretty good. The ballad is the one that got me. what defines tailor made is that anything copying a style from a previous era ? Lee fields for example his output is fantastic but is a style from the past but still authentic and genuine. That said he does have releases going all the way back. also daptone etc. 1 minute ago, Dylan said: Edited yesterday at 16:14 by Dylan 1
Dr Ray Dj Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 20 hours ago, Solidsoul said: Maybe it will be good to re-engineer existing records? Take out instrumental backing sounds or vocals that detract from the song. Conversely we could add an extra chorus or an extra instrumental break? Overall I would rather it wasn't used and we just had the existing records. But as we have found out with the internet, the genie can't be put back in the bottle? I think it’s been used already (Beatles tracks) to extract individual parts of recordings so they can be reconstructed which could be useful to the scene where there are no original masters, not the best solution but better than nothing 1
Soulman58 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 23/11/2024 at 11:43, Timbo58 said: Anything that takes away authenticity in soul music itself (or even events that play it for that matter) makes it by definition inauthentic and therefore (to my mind at least) a pastiche of what true rare soul should be -it becomes an insult to the artists and those who actually know what 'the faith' actually means. AI is about as far away from 'real' as it can possibly be. So let's leave its products to the venues with their glitter balls, disco lasers & local yokels jigging about with drinks, you know -the ones that social media repeatedly tells us are 'the soul scene'. At its best soul performances should be live, no idea how AI (or as I know it f### the workforce) will deliver that.
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!