Jump to content

Kent Anniversary counterfeits or are they?


Tobytyke
Go to solution Solved by Alan T,

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Chalky said:

If that company still has the stampers/masters then there is nothing to stop them pressing more.

something doesn’t look right with what is going on. 

This is what I was thinking.  They still have stampers and these have been pressed recently.  It’s only guess work on my part.

Link to comment
Social source share

4 hours ago, Mithras said:

 This is Feedback of one seller on ebay  all same tittles and has sold more than the feedback shows  this is detailed by the sales history and its only kent 45's also he is not the only seller and same tittles crop up this has been going on for over a year with different sellers and does not take in account discogs sales....looks quite odd 4 MAGICIANS?? these keep cropping up on ebay

I did say this and post a link to the feedback details on Sunday ... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Social source share

2 hours ago, Woodbutcher said:

I did say this and post a link to the feedback details on Sunday ... :rolleyes:

More to come i got most of the title's  in dispute from a Melton Mobrey seller who was on ebay... got them cheap pre covid before it went crazy on prices ... checked it out  they use   seller name  on  Discogs and guess what  same titles there??? Magicians..... and the rest  However they sell soul related discs as well...

 

 

Link to comment
Social source share

3 hours ago, Tobytyke said:

I paid over £100 for the magicians 10 years ago. 

I dont attend the 100 club but appreciate the quality and rarity of the singles.

I have over half of them and would like to complete the set.

However this has changed my mind paying lots of money for something that's being pressed as we speak.

This is morally unacceptable.  If whoever it is wants to churn these records out why doesn't he slap a plain white label on them and sell them for a tenner, I'm sure there would be plenty of buyers and we would all know where we stand. 

And there lies the problem, they whoever they may be , want to make as much money as possible before being caught out , then they'll more than likely dump them at £3 to £6 each on the ebay sellers ,to sell on say £15 to £ 20, once the cat is out of the bag .

It's happened before I'm afraid. 

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

10 hours ago, Chalky said:

If that company still has the stampers/masters then there is nothing to stop them pressing more.

something doesn’t look right with what is going on. 

On these records they won’t for a number of reasons. 
On the ones that were already known about it could be a problem. But those one’s aren’t really worth much anyway. 
 

Link to comment
Social source share

20 minutes ago, Dean Rudland said:

On these records they won’t for a number of reasons. 
On the ones that were already known about it could be a problem. But those one’s aren’t really worth much anyway. 
 

What a ridiculous statement , there are plenty of bootleggers out there making a living selling £15 pressings so knocking them out for over a ton a piece is a very lucrative enterprise indeed.

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

7 hours ago, Woodbutcher said:

What a ridiculous statement , there are plenty of bootleggers out there making a living selling £15 pressings so knocking them out for over a ton a piece is a very lucrative enterprise indeed.

Chalky was I think was asking if it was possible that these latest records that have come up for sale are being pressed from the original parts, and my answer, based on working for Ace/ Kent amongst other labels is no. 
Most big factories protect their clients metalwork and it is very difficult for this to happen at the time of a release. Metalwork is then destroyed after a couple of years in most plants. 
So it is virtually impossible that if these are bootlegs that they are coming from the original parts.
The over pressing of Anniversary titles happened at one plant and at the time the record was originally pressed.  
But it’s great to see that Soul Source whilst less populated is still the place where people with actual knowledge of the question are shouted down as ridiculous. 😉

Link to comment
Social source share

41 minutes ago, Dean Rudland said:

Chalky was I think was asking if it was possible that these latest records that have come up for sale are being pressed from the original parts, and my answer, based on working for Ace/ Kent amongst other labels is no. 
Most big factories protect their clients metalwork and it is very difficult for this to happen at the time of a release. Metalwork is then destroyed after a couple of years in most plants. 
So it is virtually impossible that if these are bootlegs that they are coming from the original parts.
The over pressing of Anniversary titles happened at one plant and at the time the record was originally pressed.  
But it’s great to see that Soul Source whilst less populated is still the place where people with actual knowledge of the question are shouted down as ridiculous. 😉

I was referring to the part of your comment about the 'value' of the 45s.

I don't think anyone's suggesting that these are counterfeits pressed after the initial run , a quick look at the photos tells me that they're the real thing , but a proper close-up examination would reveal run-out discrepancies etc.

No-one's ever made a counterfeit that can't be spotted by some means or other .

The question is whether more titles were over-pressed than originally thought , but if not then where did these multiple 'brand new' copies suddenly spring from and end up in the hands of one particular seller on the bay.

Perhaps you'd be so kind , in your capacity as the self-proclaimed expert and connections the label , to undertake said investigation on behalf of the rest of us mere mortals. 

 

Link to comment
Social source share

3 minutes ago, Woodbutcher said:

I was referring to the part of your comment about the 'value' of the 45s.

I don't think anyone's suggesting that these are counterfeits pressed after the initial run , a quick look at the photos tells me that they're the real thing , but a proper close-up examination would reveal run-out discrepancies etc.

No-one's ever made a counterfeit that can't be spotted by some means or other .

The question is whether more titles were over-pressed than originally thought , but if not then where did these multiple 'brand new' copies suddenly spring from and end up in the hands of one particular seller on the bay.

Perhaps you'd be so kind , in your capacity as the self-proclaimed expert and connections the label , to undertake said investigation on behalf of the rest of us mere mortals. 

 

First of all my value comment was on the copies that were over pressed, which go for about £25 at most. 
 

I’ll be clear - as I thought I had been - the over pressing by the plant occurred on only 3 titles, all pressed at the same pressing plant. 
 

Whoever is selling these either had copies from the night or has judiciously gathered some up since.

 

 


 


 

 

Link to comment
Social source share

11 minutes ago, Dean Rudland said:

First of all my value comment was on the copies that were over pressed, which go for about £25 at most. 

I’ll be clear - as I thought I had been - the over pressing by the plant occurred on only 3 titles, all pressed at the same pressing plant. 
 

 

So just for clarification , which three 45s are you referring to that were overpressed and only make £25 ?

 

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

36 minutes ago, Woodbutcher said:

So just for clarification , which three 45s are you referring to that were overpressed and only make £25 ?

 

Nancy Wilcox, Sandra Richardson and Classic Example

I think it's worth noting that 300 copies is a lot to be circulating when demand dips or there isn't any to start with.

So for instance one of my favourites - The Magnificent - which definitely wasn't over-pressed goes for less than Sandra Richardson which was over -pressed, and is more than £25 for a copy now, I see.

The one's being sold at the moment were very in demand when they came out and the prices have dropped a bit since then (or certainly those records hang around longer now). If someone had a business with over pressed stock the time to get rid of them would have been at the time.

But as I say, it is almost impossible to do at a big factory and those three were the ones printed at the smaller rogue factory.

 

 

 

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

2 hours ago, Dean Rudland said:

First of all my value comment was on the copies that were over pressed, which go for about £25 at most. 
 

I’ll be clear - as I thought I had been - the over pressing by the plant occurred on only 3 titles, all pressed at the same pressing plant. 
 

Whoever is selling these either had copies from the night or has judiciously gathered some up since.

 

 

 

I think there is more to it than gathering spare copies on the market, neither The Magicians, Milton Bennett nor The Paramount four have been selling cheap, all pretty much in demand titles. For one seller to sell multiple copies and still have copies for sale makes me thinks something dodgy going on.  I was offered the Mill Evans from the seller last night at a discount. 

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share


14 minutes ago, Chalky said:

I think there is more to it than gathering spare copies on the market, neither The Magicians, Milton Bennett nor The Paramount four have been selling cheap, all pretty much in demand titles. For one seller to sell multiple copies and still have copies for sale makes me thinks something dodgy going on.  I was offered the Mill Evans from the seller last night at a discount. 

Maybe, but what?

These weren't over-pressed at the time I feel certain of that.

The Paramount Four has for instance sold 30 times on Discogs and the price has come down £100 from its peak, and the last one was up for a couple of months before it sold.

Same with the Magicians, for which there are three copies for sale from £325 on discogs, but it's highest price is £350, and every copy since then has sold for less.

Virtually all of these have had standard Kent issues since their first release.

The market for these is possibly not that big.

Edited by Dean Rudland
Link to comment
Social source share

3 hours ago, Dean Rudland said:

Maybe, but what?

These weren't over-pressed at the time I feel certain of that.

The Paramount Four has for instance sold 30 times on Discogs and the price has come down £100 from its peak, and the last one was up for a couple of months before it sold.

Same with the Magicians, for which there are three copies for sale from £325 on discogs, but it's highest price is £350, and every copy since then has sold for less.

Virtually all of these have had standard Kent issues since their first release.

The market for these is possibly not that big.

It’s a big gamble to take to hoover up copies for what is a sizeable outlay and hope to make a profit. It’s just odd that these few titles are appearing with regularity from the same sellers. 

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

6 hours ago, Dean Rudland said:

Nancy Wilcox, Sandra Richardson and Classic Example

I think it's worth noting that 300 copies is a lot to be circulating when demand dips or there isn't any to start with.

So for instance one of my favourites - The Magnificent - which definitely wasn't over-pressed goes for less than Sandra Richardson which was over -pressed, and is more than £25 for a copy now, I see.

The one's being sold at the moment were very in demand when they came out and the prices have dropped a bit since then (or certainly those records hang around longer now). If someone had a business with over pressed stock the time to get rid of them would have been at the time.

But as I say, it is almost impossible to do at a big factory and those three were the ones printed at the smaller rogue factory.

 

 

 

What about the Smith Brothers ? 

Link to comment
Social source share

1 hour ago, Blackpoolsoul said:

Everyone wants to sell them as there was a jump fault on the flip, which Ady explained, I believe.

Mine doesn't skip, suppose that means it must be dodgy!!

The "person of interest" gets about. Earlier items for sale mention collect in person at Witney, Kidlington and Market Harborough. 

  • Helpful 1
Link to comment
Social source share

3 hours ago, Blackpoolsoul said:

Everyone wants to sell them as there was a jump fault on the flip, which Ady explained, I believe.

If they where handed out at the 39th Anniversary, no extra copies ? Then why did every seller on eBay & shops have them at a reasonable price , some still do ranging from £15 . upwards , I played Simon Barbee,The wind , the other night didn't notice any jump or skip .

Link to comment
Social source share

On 30/10/2024 at 09:28, Dean Rudland said:

Nancy Wilcox, Sandra Richardson and Classic Example

I think it's worth noting that 300 copies is a lot to be circulating when demand dips or there isn't any to start with.

So for instance one of my favourites - The Magnificent - which definitely wasn't over-pressed goes for less than Sandra Richardson which was over -pressed, and is more than £25 for a copy now, I see.

The one's being sold at the moment were very in demand when they came out and the prices have dropped a bit since then (or certainly those records hang around longer now). If someone had a business with over pressed stock the time to get rid of them would have been at the time.

But as I say, it is almost impossible to do at a big factory and those three were the ones printed at the smaller rogue factory.

 

 

 

My understanding of Ady Croasdell's message on Tuesday is that Sandra Richardson/Hytones was not over pressed

Edited by Hunter Quint
Link to comment
Social source share

On 30/10/2024 at 15:30, Blackpoolsoul said:

Everyone wants to sell them as there was a jump fault on the flip, which Ady explained, I believe.

None of them jump.

On the night there was a note included alluding to a jump/skip, but the jump was caused by Ady's deck when playing the test copy.  That's why he thought there was a jump/skip. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Social source share

8 hours ago, Supercorsa said:

None of them jump.

On the night there was a note included alluding to a jump/skip, but the jump was caused by Ady's deck when playing the test copy.  That's why he thought there was a jump/skip. 

Thanks I read he had sent a letter out with them explaining they jumped.  Would love to see it.

 

Link to comment
Social source share


Get involved with Soul Source

Add your comments now

Join Soul Source

A free & easy soul music affair!

Join Soul Source now!

Log in to Soul Source

Jump right back in!

Log in now!


×
×
  • Create New...