Gaz T Posted September 27 Posted September 27 This record is a top rare rnb Detroit session firstly, I was after this for years but after getting a copy, it has now been made clear to me that there are two takes two different mixes, but completely different vocal takes two different label styles with two different takes both top tunes the dottys label without the dots gives up a straight rnb version with guitar up front the dottys label with the dots gives up a more soulful version with different vocals and less guitar I have looked over this 45 Both these 45s are original Detroit 45s only 5 of each versions ever sold on discogs in 20 years so its a tune ! the first version is a straightforward rnb take with rnb guitar high in the mix the second take is different, its more laid back, without the rnb guitar and very soulful with different vocals Callum has and plays the tune I love this tune Its Edwin starrs family
Peter99 Posted September 27 Posted September 27 47 minutes ago, Gaz T said: This record is a top rare rnb Detroit session firstly, I was after this for years but after getting a copy, it has now been made clear to me that there are two takes two different mixes, but completely different vocal takes two different label styles with two different takes both top tunes the dottys label without the dots gives up a straight rnb version with guitar up front the dottys label with the dots gives up a more soulful version with different vocals and less guitar I have looked over this 45 Both these 45s are original Detroit 45s only 5 of each versions ever sold on discogs in 20 years so its a tune ! the first version is a straightforward rnb take with rnb guitar high in the mix the second take is different, its more laid back, without the rnb guitar and very soulful with different vocals Callum has and plays the tune I love this tune Its Edwin starrs family It's certainly one for happy quick feet. Peter
Dylan Posted September 28 Posted September 28 I know party over yonder / I need you is it also on another release with a different flip ? I need you is great deep soul I used to have this 45.
Roburt Posted September 28 Posted September 28 Roger didn't really seem to be well served by his record companies, but then he could be a very difficult person to deal with. Lots of his recordings down the years have proven to be difficult to get hold of. I guess he pissed off a lot of the bigger recording outfits & so had to make do with little indies & his own labels to get his tracks out. UK Expansion put out a comp album on him many moons ago (The Roger Hatcher Collection) & I was tasked with getting his bio from him to go in the CD release's booklet. To say he was obstructive to my approaches would be an understatement. In the end, Lou Ragland (who knew him) had to read him the riot act to get him to cooperate with my task. I believe Expansion had a few problems in their dealings with him too, after their album was released. 1
Gaz T Posted September 28 Author Posted September 28 9 hours ago, Peter99 said: It's certainly one for happy quick feet. Peter It’ is But it’s only 2 minutes everyone can last 2 mins can’t they 1
Gaz T Posted September 28 Author Posted September 28 21 minutes ago, Roburt said: Roger didn't really seem to be well served by his record companies, but then he could be a very difficult person to deal with. Lots of his recordings down the years have proven to be difficult to get hold of. I guess he pissed off a lot of the bigger recording outfits & so had to make do with little indies & his own labels to get his tracks out. UK Expansion put out a comp album on him many moons ago (The Roger Hatcher Collection) & I was tasked with getting his bio from him to go in the CD release's booklet. To say he was obstructive to my approaches would be an understatement. In the end, Lou Ragland (who knew him) had to read him the riot act to get him to cooperate with my task. I believe Expansion had a few problems in their dealings with him too, after their album was released. Great stuff so he was a proper pain in the arse fair play . So the dottys 45 has 2 pressing runs I presume they were trying to push “I need you” I wonder how 2 completely different takes of the b side ended up being released I thought I would post this as there is nothing online referencing these different takes 1
John Reed Posted September 28 Posted September 28 43 minutes ago, Roburt said: Roger didn't really seem to be well served by his record companies, but then he could be a very difficult person to deal with. Lots of his recordings down the years have proven to be difficult to get hold of. I guess he pissed off a lot of the bigger recording outfits & so had to make do with little indies & his own labels to get his tracks out. I don't think it was just him, his family are difficult to deal with as well. Around 20 years ago I posted Stormy Love Affair on my YouTube channel, it was on there for about 10 years, before one of his family accused me of making money off of this recording and threatened to sue. 1
Gaz T Posted September 28 Author Posted September 28 3 hours ago, John Reed said: I don't think it was just him, his family are difficult to deal with as well. Around 20 years ago I posted Stormy Love Affair on my YouTube channel, it was on there for about 10 years, before one of his family accused me of making money off of this recording and threatened to sue. well I won’t be posting the other version of the dottys 45 on u tube then The 2 posts on u tube is the version with the up front guitar
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!