Jump to content

Royal Mail refusing to honour insurance - thoughts/advice?


Recommended Posts

I sell (and buy) a lot of records.

Only ever had to claim twice - once for a record that disappeared en route, and recently for one which arrived cracked.

It was only a copy of Cashing In, but still.

I had sent it guaranteed next day with standard insurance (I can't remember but I think you're automatically covered up to £750 - doesn't matter anyway, I had declared the value at £75, which is what I'd sold it for, and it was clearly well within the standard insurance figure).

Well-packaged, the same as they always are - hence I've never needed to claim for a breakage before.

Royal Mail have simply refused to honour the insurance (in two emails).

They haven't even explained why, which is almost as aggravating as the refusal.

I am of course escalating this claim, and if necessary I'll go to the small claims court, just on principle, but I wondered what experience others had had?

 

 

Link to comment
Social source share

On the odd occasion I’ve had to make a claim I’ve never had a problem as I always make sure I use an adequate service with the correct compensation level for the value of the item and always keep the posting receipt for a couple of years to avoid possible Paypal “charge back” scam claims etc.

Can’t see the problem here. So long as you have the original posting receipt Royal Mail should honour the claim provided that you have filled in the claim form correctly and provided the standard details they ask for such as photographs of the damaged item etc.

Should you have to take them to the small claims court it’s highly likely they won’t defend the action due to the costs involved for them and even if they did you should win as long as you can show you have followed a correct line of procedure. Good luck hope you get your money back. 

Edited by Modern Man
Spelling error
  • Helpful 1
Link to comment
Social source share

Yeah good luck we all hope you get your money back, lert's face it RM are a bunch of crooks, that hasnt changed... they should have their Royal patronage taken off them after everything they have done to their service and employees.

  • Up vote 1
  • Helpful 1
Link to comment
Social source share

23 minutes ago, Modern Man said:

On the odd occasion I’ve had to make a claim I’ve never had a problem as I always make sure I use an adequate service with the correct compensation level for the value of the item and always keep the posting receipt for a couple of years to avoid possible Paypal “charge back” scam claims etc.

Can’t see the problem here. So long as you have the original posting receipt Royal Mail should honour the claim provided that you have filled in the claim form correctly and provided the standard details they ask for such as photographs of the damaged item etc.

Should you have to take them to the small claims court it’s highly likely they won’t defend the action due to the costs involved for them and even if they did you should win as long as you can show you have followed a correct line of procedure. Good luck hope you get your money back. 

Yes, I always post anything worth more than £50 Special Delivery Next Day Guaranteed by 1pm for precisely this reason.
 

(Anything more than £1k I courier or even hand deliver if close enough.)

I can't see the problem either - I'm mystified actually.

I could easily claim more than £75 for a NM Cashing In, too - I'm simply claiming what I sold it for, not the likely replacement cost (I don't need a replacement).

I'm familiar with the way the courts operate and I doubt it will come to it but I'm quite prepared to go that far if necessary. 
 

I can only assume they're under some sort of directive designed to fob off the less determined - the process certainly appears to become more laborious as you progress through the various tiers, which I assume is by design. 

Link to comment
Social source share

18 hours ago, Paraboliccurve said:

Yes, I always post anything worth more than £50 Special Delivery Next Day Guaranteed by 1pm for precisely this reason.
 

(Anything more than £1k I courier or even hand deliver if close enough.)

I can't see the problem either - I'm mystified actually.

I could easily claim more than £75 for a NM Cashing In, too - I'm simply claiming what I sold it for, not the likely replacement cost (I don't need a replacement).

I'm familiar with the way the courts operate and I doubt it will come to it but I'm quite prepared to go that far if necessary. 
 

I can only assume they're under some sort of directive designed to fob off the less determined - the process certainly appears to become more laborious as you progress through the various tiers, which I assume is by design. 

As with most companies nowadays the message is cascaded down. "Put them off and we will chance they will give up".  Stick to your guns and claim for your time as well, time is valuable.

  • Up vote 2
Link to comment
Social source share

The problem I’ve had is Royal Mail demand proof of value not the sales price. How many of us have receipts for every records you own…..

In all the years I’ve only had to make 5 or 6  claims. The most recent was a few weeks ago for a £5.50 George Benson 45 that never arrived. I refunded the buyer and made a claim on principle rather than for the money and to RM’s credit they sent me a cheque inc postage. 

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

12 hours ago, Paul Capon said:

The problem I’ve had is Royal Mail demand proof of value not the sales price. How many of us have receipts for every records you own…..

Interesting, is not a sale price essentially proof of value?

Royal Mail recently lost a 45 I sold on ebay - sale price was £65. I filed a claim and I sent them a screenshot of the sale price. This figure was accepted as proof of value.

Buyer got a refund, I lose a record and I'm now wondering where these 'lost' items disappear to...🤔 It was clearly labelled up with a return address too.

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

49 minutes ago, Soul16 said:

Interesting, is not a sale price essentially proof of value?

Royal Mail recently lost a 45 I sold on ebay - sale price was £65. I filed a claim and I sent them a screenshot of the sale price. This figure was accepted as proof of value.

Buyer got a refund, I lose a record and I'm now wondering where these 'lost' items disappear to...🤔 It was clearly labelled up with a return address too.

Sale price in and of itself is pretty much irrelevant if it comes down to a court case - otherwise the potential for fraud is very real.

For instance, I agree with you to sell you a pressing with a realistic value of £5 for £500, it 'arrives broken' (because you stamp on it after receiving it), I claim, we split the £500.

(I hope I'm not giving anyone any ideas - this would be a serious criminal conspiracy.)

Value in something like a record would be established by data from popsike, discogs, and possibly an expert or two eg Manship. Sale price would be supporting evidence.

By the way, they are still refusing to pay, which is absurd.

I had two more emails yesterday, both of them confirming that they're not prepared to honour their insurance, the meat of which is as follows.

First email:

To claim compensation for damaged items, you need to provide evidence of a transaction taking place, if sold on eBay this needs to be the final sale page.  Evidence of the original packaging including the internal packaging and external packaging showing the postage label in full.  I note from your claim this was not provided.
 
If you’re able to provide evidence of a transaction or refund taking place and evidence showing the original packaging, I’ll be happy to reassess your claim.

My response to this email was as follows:

1. This is the first I was told of this 'requirement', which does not appear on the original claim form. I can of course provide such evidence - of £75 plus money for postage being transferred to me by the original purchaser of the record and then of my reimbursement of the same to him when it arrived broken.

2. But it is anyway nonsensical. I purchased insurance from the Post Office for the transportation of a record, and they damaged the record in transit. It doesn't make any difference whether I was sending it as a purchased item, or a gift, or just as a curiosity for the recipient to (I dunno) DJ with and then send back to me. I appreciate this last scenario is unlikely, but it's not impossible, and I introduced it merely as a way of demonstrating tnat the insurance I paid for was entirely unrelated to the reasons for my sending the record (or anything else).

Anyway, while I was digesting that piece of nonsense I received a second response:

I’m sorry to advise you that having inspected the packaging of your item, the contents wouldn’t have been sufficiently protected and as such I’m unable to take any further action in this matter.  More information on our packaging guidelines can be found at www.royalmail.com/packaging. Specifically the section for Records (Vinyl discs).

Obviously, she hasn't 'inspected the packaging', only the photographs I submitted with my original claim. The packaging was exactly the same as I always use - namely, four stiff thick pieces of cardboard, two either side of the record, which is itself in a further cardboard sleeve.

This is way stronger than any mailer Post Office sells, and I've sent hundreds of records out in that manner (and received many in similar style) with no previous damage. This by definition means it is suitable for post.

Her link to www.royalmail.com/packaging and the section for Records gives 'guidance'.

The guidance is as follows:

Place between thick card and surround with cushioning material at least 2.5cm longer than the item. Wrap in strong paper, seal with tape and clearly mark package RECORDS - DO NOT BEND.

It also says (in a general preamble): Please follow these guidelines to make sure your eligibility for compensation isn't affected if the item doesn't arrive as expected.

I expect this is ultimately what they will try to hide behind - my packaging was absolutely fine for purpose, but I didn't follow this to the letter (because I'd never read the guidance before, I don't suppose many of us have?).

However, as I say, it is guidance - if they said it was mandatory that might be different - and these guidelines have never been stipulated as conditional to me by any Post Office employee (ie they've never said to me 'This record is inappropriately packaged and does not meet our guidance which is a condition of our accepting this contract'), nor have they refused to take my money because I don't quite meet the guidelines

So I think I'm on fairly strong legal ground - it will probably come down to proving the value of the record (£75 is well within any margin of error) and proving that my packaging was of sufficient quality that I had a reasonable expectation that the record would arrive in good condition.

But this is food for thought, at least.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Helpful 1
Link to comment
Social source share

13 hours ago, Paul Capon said:

The problem I’ve had is Royal Mail demand proof of value not the sales price. How many of us have receipts for every records you own…..

In all the years I’ve only had to make 5 or 6  claims. The most recent was a few weeks ago for a £5.50 George Benson 45 that never arrived. I refunded the buyer and made a claim on principle rather than for the money and to RM’s credit they sent me a cheque inc postage. 

Re value Paul see my reply below - they pretty much have to go on 'value', and that definitely isn't just about the price you personally paid (often years earlier), but it's an interesting point. I always get asked to declare a value when posting,

Link to comment
Social source share

I sent a record registered

...arrived cracked....claimed online ...they wanted proof.Tje photos I uploaded were not good enough I sent them the cracked record and the packaging which I luckily got back.Took months and months and I had to threaten them with the small claims court.It is a war of attrition.

  • Helpful 1
Link to comment
Social source share

I don't sell many records, but i've had a similar problems of a record arriving broken to a customer in Germany, one posted the same day to Portugal took longer to arrive but was intact. I used the same packing in both parcels & sent all the details they required, proof of purchase etc. photo's from the customer of the packing & broken record & heard nothing. I phones them on several occasions for an update only to be told "I'll look into it for you" The final time about 3 months later the P.O. guy I spoke to said "I think you've waited long enough" and I got a refund within a few days. I think they deliberately do nothing & hope you give up, I had to pester virtually weekly at the end to get a result, don't give up that's what they are hoping for. I no longer send abroad, as I don't think the risk is worth all the hassle if there are problems .

Good Luck

  • Helpful 1
Link to comment
Social source share

34 minutes ago, 6T's Mojoman said:

I think they deliberately do nothing & hope you give up, I had to pester virtually weekly at the end to get a result, don't give up that's what they are hoping for. I no longer send abroad, as I don't think the risk is worth all the hassle if there are problems .

Good Luck

Cheers. I think this is right. I've almost no doubt - even allowing for the vagaries of the county court - that I'm on strong legal ground, so I assume they'll settle before it gets to that. But I'm going to ask for an hour of my time to be paid for as well now, and warn them that more time will become chargeable thereafter 🙂

Link to comment
Social source share

On 14/07/2024 at 11:40, Paraboliccurve said:

I sell (and buy) a lot of records.

Only ever had to claim twice - once for a record that disappeared en route, and recently for one which arrived cracked.

It was only a copy of Cashing In, but still.

I had sent it guaranteed next day with standard insurance (I can't remember but I think you're automatically covered up to £750 - doesn't matter anyway, I had declared the value at £75, which is what I'd sold it for, and it was clearly well within the standard insurance figure).

Well-packaged, the same as they always are - hence I've never needed to claim for a breakage before.

Royal Mail have simply refused to honour the insurance (in two emails).

They haven't even explained why, which is almost as aggravating as the refusal.

I am of course escalating this claim, and if necessary I'll go to the small claims court, just on principle, but I wondered what experience others had had?

 

 

Think only the buyer can make the claim, as he has payed you and does not have the item .. 

Link to comment
Social source share

6 minutes ago, Sheep said:

Think only the buyer can make the claim, as he has payed you and does not have the item .. 

That's not correct - his contract was with me.

I have to compensate him for delivery of a faulty product (which I have), but he can't claim against the Post Office because he has no contractual relationship with them

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

1 hour ago, Paraboliccurve said:

That's not correct - his contract was with me.

I have to compensate him for delivery of a faulty product (which I have), but he can't claim against the Post Office because he has no contractual relationship with them

That's not my experience.  They have a duty of care to deliver the item to the recipient. In your case the buyer has not lost any money, so a different situation.

Link to comment
Social source share

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Sheep said:

That's not my experience.  They have a duty of care to deliver the item to the recipient. In your case the buyer has not lost any money, so a different situation.

You can't seek redress for the failure to provide a service in circumstances like these which you haven't paid for, that's a simple matter of English law.

I'll happily stand corrected but I don't think this is possible. 
 

It makes no difference whatsoever if he's lost money (ie if I had refused to reimburse him).
 

He can only seek redress from me (which obviously I was happy to agree to, getting the record there safely is my problem, not his), because he *has* paid me, and it's then up to me to seek redress for the failure of my counterparty ie the Royal Mail. 

Edited by Paraboliccurve
  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share


1 hour ago, Chalky said:

Not sure if it has been mentioned but Royal Mail in their small print stipulate packaging should be in a jiffy bag, or they did. 

They certainly don't now - as above they suggest guidelines but those don't include Jiffy bags. 

But - also as above - guidelines are guidelines, not conditions.
 

For that to be a serious issue they would have to make the Jiffy bags (or any other packaging they cared to stipulate) a condition of service (ie a term of the contract) and make that very clear. 

It obviously would be untenable for them to accept £8.95 for a service which explicitly includes insurance if they know in advance that the customer will not be able to rely on that insurance because of incorrect packaging.

They'd have to instruct their staff not to accept packages which didn't meet those conditions.

They don't do this I assume because it would mean their staff spent all day rejecting packages, not accepting them, and would crater their business inside a week. 
As someone else says above, they're trying it on and they're going to be out of luck. 

  • Up vote 1
Link to comment
Social source share

Get involved with Soul Source

Add your comments now

Join Soul Source

A free & easy soul music affair!

Join Soul Source now!

Log in to Soul Source

Jump right back in!

Log in now!


×
×
  • Create New...