The Invitations - Watch Out Little Girl - Question

[chuffinnora]

Hi all - I am a newbie posting to this site and I was wondering if anyone has come across this record label variant. The only one I can find on scouring the internet is the black MGM label. Just wondering if this is a genuine release or a bootleg. Cracking tune mind! Excuse my ignorance.

Cheers

chuffinnora

[Kenb]

The label variant is pucker…there are better experts on here who would know whether it’s a boot.

Edited May 6, 2023 by Kenb

[Woodbutcher]

Going by the very poor printing and the fact that there's no sign of anything similar in an online search I'd be confident that it's a wrong'un.

[chuffinnora]

  On 06/05/2023 at 09:08, Kenb said:

The label variant is pucker…there are better experts on here who would know whether it’s a boot.

Expand  

Cheers Kenb

  On 06/05/2023 at 09:56, Woodbutcher said:

Going by the very poor printing and the fact that there's no sign of anything similar in an online search I'd be confident that it's a wrong'un.

Expand  

Cheers Woodbutcher

[Kenb]

  On 06/05/2023 at 09:56, Woodbutcher said:

Going by the very poor printing and the fact that there's no sign of anything similar in an online search I'd be confident that it's a wrong'un.

Expand  

I’m no expert on boots, but I have a Connie Francis oldie (not tick tick, although I do have that) on a similar/ same label imprint.perhaps though “your 45” may not be “right”. All  I can say is I have a near identical label.( but not with that track on it)

Edited May 6, 2023 by Kenb

[Woodbutcher]

  On 06/05/2023 at 12:13, Kenb said:

I’m no expert on boots, but I have a Connie Francis oldie (not tick tick, although I do have that) on a similar/ same label imprint.perhaps though “your 45” may not be “right”. All  I can say is I have a near identical label.( but not with that track on it)

Expand  

Look at the lettering , clean and crisp.

Edited May 6, 2023 by Woodbutcher

[Modularman]

There are many other legit MGM 45's that have the same 'poor' printing so this 45 is not unique in that respect. Suspicious and intriguing in equal measures. Can you provide a scan with it out of the sleeve and give us the matrix numbers? 

Edited May 7, 2023 by Modularman

[Mgm 1251]

  On 06/05/2023 at 12:34, Woodbutcher said:

Look at the lettering , clean and crisp.

Expand  

One is  a UK release and the other is a debatable US release..

The Invitations disc looks quite good compared to that Embers disc....

[chuffinnora]

  On 07/05/2023 at 08:10, Modularman said:

There are many other legit MGM 45's that have the same 'poor' printing so this 45 is not unique in that respect. Suspicious and intriguing in equal measures. Can you provide a scan with it out of the sleeve and give us the matrix numbers? 

Expand  

Hi Modularman

Thanks for your reply. I have attached two images out of the sleeve below.

Cheers chuffinnora

The matrix numbers are:

Side A: K13666 101015

Side B: K13666 101016 A.L

[Modularman]

  On 07/05/2023 at 14:54, chuffinnora said:

Hi Modularman

Thanks for your reply. I have attached two images out of the sleeve below.

Cheers chuffinnora

The matrix numbers are:

Side A: K13666 101015

Side B: K13666 101016 A.L

Expand  

Cheers for those.

Those matrixes are the same as my promo copy. Are they scratched in or stamped in the runout?

[chuffinnora]

  On 07/05/2023 at 15:48, Modularman said:

Cheers for those.

Those matrixes are the same as my promo copy. Are they scratched in or stamped in the runout?

Expand  

Hi - scratched in. Cheers.

[Chalky]

wasn't aware it had been boosted on this variant?  Looks pretty much there same as other releases with that label variant, 1968/69 onwards.

[Modularman]

  On 07/05/2023 at 15:51, chuffinnora said:

Hi - scratched in. Cheers.

Expand  

The promo matrixes are scratched in too.

Here are some pictures of them, are yours the same?

[chuffinnora]

  On 07/05/2023 at 17:23, Modularman said:

The promo matrixes are scratched in too.

Here are some pictures of them, are yours the same?

Expand  

Hi Modularman

Yes the same.

[Woodbutcher]

I guess a lot of MGM labels are 'poorly printed' then looking at these ... usually a good pointer generally.

[Modularman]

  On 07/05/2023 at 16:58, Chalky said:

wasn't aware it had been boosted on this variant?  Looks pretty much there same as other releases with that label variant, 1968/69 onwards.

Expand  

Have you seen this variant before Chalky?

There is no trace of it on popsike, discogs, 45cat, ebay or a general Google search.

[Chalky]

  On 07/05/2023 at 17:43, Modularman said:

Have you seen this variant before Chalky?

There is no trace of it on popsike, discogs, 45cat, ebay or a general Google search.

Expand  

Just looked again and noticed "Little" in the title and different music publisher.  Been a long three days with little sleep 

Edited May 7, 2023 by Chalky

[Mgm 1251]

I’m confused ....

[Mgm 1251]

Is this thread about The Embers or The Invitations....?

[Theothertosspot]

  On 07/05/2023 at 18:23, Chalky said:

Just looked again and noticed "Little" in the title and different music publisher.  Been a long three days with little sleep 

Expand  

Are you getting Embers and Invitations mixed up due to lack of sleep

[Theothertosspot]

  On 07/05/2023 at 18:36, Mgm 1251 said:

Is this thread about The Embers or The Invitations....?

Expand  

Think the thread is about the Invitations issue, but as gone slightly off course. 

The Invitations issue, although not seen one before, does look legit (imo).

Regards 

[Mgm 1251]

Yes...I think the ol’ trucker has gone off down the wrong road....

 

  On 07/05/2023 at 18:42, Theothertosspot said:

Think the thread is about the Invitations issue, but as gone slightly off course. 

The Invitations issue, although not seen one before, does look legit (imo).

Regards 

Expand  

Just like you,I ain’t seen another one niether,but did say in an earlier post that it does look ‘good’..

[chuffinnora]

  On 07/05/2023 at 18:36, Mgm 1251 said:

Is this thread about The Embers or The Invitations....?

Expand  

Hi Mgm 1251 it was originally about a copy of Watch Little Girl by the Invitations I have on an MGM label that I couldn't find any information on anywhere on the internet. I wanted to see if I can find out if it is a boot.

Cheers

Darren

[Mgm 1251]

  On 07/05/2023 at 18:53, chuffinnora said:

Hi Mgm 1251 it was originally about a copy of Watch Little Girl by the Invitations I have on an MGM label that I couldn't find any information on anywhere on the internet. I wanted to see if I can find out if it is a boot.

Cheers

Darren

Expand  

Hi Darren...as a matter of interest,how long have you had it for...?

[Modularman]

  On 07/05/2023 at 18:42, Theothertosspot said:

Think the thread is about the Invitations issue, but as gone slightly off course. 

The Invitations issue, although not seen one before, does look legit (imo).

Regards 

Expand  

Yes it's the Invitations we are referring to 

The black MGM label design used on the issue of 'Watch Out Little Girl' was used from 1959 - 1968.

The label variant the OP has was used from 1968 - 1982 so it must be a later press using the same stampers. 

Never seen one before either but it must be legit!

[Chalky]

  On 07/05/2023 at 18:36, Theothertosspot said:

Are you getting Embers and Invitations mixed up due to lack of sleep

Expand  

Yes….told you it’d been a long three days  

never seen this variant before, that label wasn’t in use at the time of release and wasn’t aware of any reissue?

off to bed now to catch up on some sleep  

[chuffinnora]

  On 07/05/2023 at 18:56, Mgm 1251 said:

Hi Darren...as a matter of interest,how long have you had it for...?

Expand  

Hi Mgm 1251 it is from my old man's collection. He would have got it when it was released or in the early 70s at the latest.

Cheers

[Mgm 1251]

  On 07/05/2023 at 19:44, chuffinnora said:

Hi Mgm 1251 it is from my old man's collection. He would have got it when it was released or in the early 70s at the latest.

Cheers

Expand  

Crikey......and nobody has seen a copy like it before...?

[Modularman]

So this is legit?

Must be rare. Anyone know how many copies a huge company like MGM would've repressed?

Why has this been off the radar for so long?

[Soul-slider]

If it's OK chuffinnora I've added your images to the 45cat site: 

https://www.45cat.com/record/k13666

These things need to be documented and maybe someone on that site will come forward with another copy. 

 

[chuffinnora]

  On 07/05/2023 at 21:38, Soul-slider said:

If it's OK chuffinnora I've added your images to the 45cat site: 

https://www.45cat.com/record/k13666

These things need to be documented and maybe someone on that site will come forward with another copy. 

 

Expand  

Hi Soul-slider, not a problem at all. I am interested to see what can be found out.

Cheers

Chuffinnora

[Chalky]

If you look at MGM releases there are others that were released on both label variants, Eric Burdon and The Magistrates the first I could see but they were in 1968 and reissued almost straight away, not a year or so later.

[Dobber]

  On 08/05/2023 at 05:41, Chalky said:

If you look at MGM releases there are others that were released on both label variants, Eric Burdon and The Magistrates the first I could see but they were in 1968 and reissued almost straight away, not a year or so later.

Expand  

Isn’t the spider turner “alive” on this blue variant,but not on a black or yellow?

[Chalky]

  On 08/05/2023 at 09:58, Dobber said:

Isn’t the spider turner “alive” on this blue variant,but not on a black or yellow?

Expand  

It is yes. It was never issued until the flip was reissued on this variant

[Dobber]

  On 08/05/2023 at 10:01, Chalky said:

It is yes. It was never issued until the flip was reissued on this variant

Expand  

So I reckon this invitations variant is on a par with the spyder turner variant where mgm toward the end of the 60’s they have a number of releases or re’releases that were put out in small numbers and have through the passing of time have become very rare items! And whilst this invitations variant is rare and a great little thing,I suspect to be a reissue of the black issue and yellow demo from maybe a couple of years earlier?

[Amsterdam Russ]

Warner Bros was acquired by Seven Arts in 1967. The first Loma release of 1968 was The Implements "Ole man soul". This is available on both the 'original' yellow Loma label and the 'new' green label. The green variant was released concurrent with the old design. The following three releases were pressed, to the best of my knowledge, solely with the original label design.

In Feb 1968, Linda Jones "My heart needs a break" was pressed with both the yellow and the green labels. Again, these were released concurrently. The new label design was not a reissue/rerelease.

The Implements release on the yellow label is commonplace. The release with the new, green label is exceptionally hard to find. I don't have a copy, but do have a scan of it. Indeed, do a Google search and the only image of it you'll find is one I posted here some time ago.

My point is that if the two MGM label designs were being used in 1968 (as stated in Modularman's post), then, as with Loma, there very easily could have been a crossover period where both were used. However, like The Implements on Loma - available with both designs, but with the new variant being super hard to locate - it could be that the new MGM logo was only partially rolled out.

I don't see any real reason to suggest The Invitations MGM swirl label is a reissue.

[Chalky]

  On 08/05/2023 at 13:50, Amsterdam Russ said:

Warner Bros was acquired by Seven Arts in 1967. The first Loma release of 1968 was The Implements "Ole man soul". This is available on both the 'original' yellow Loma label and the 'new' green label. The green variant was released concurrent with the old design. The following three releases were pressed, to the best of my knowledge, solely with the original label design.

In Feb 1968, Linda Jones "My heart needs a break" was pressed with both the yellow and the green labels. Again, these were released concurrently. The new label design was not a reissue/rerelease.

The Implements release on the yellow label is commonplace. The release with the new, green label is exceptionally hard to find. I don't have a copy, but do have a scan of it. Indeed, do a Google search and the only image of it you'll find is one I posted here some time ago.

My point is that if the two MGM label designs were being used in 1968 (as stated in Modularman's post), then, as with Loma, there very easily could have been a crossover period where both were used. However, like The Implements on Loma - available with both designs, but with the new variant being super hard to locate - it could be that the new MGM logo was only partially rolled out.

I don't see any real reason to suggest The Invitations MGM swirl label is a reissue.

Expand  

The Invitations was Feb 1967. The label in question came about in April 1968.  There was a mixture of Black and Blue and gold releases on certain releases during the crossover period with certain plants using the black well into 1968. 
 

It would suggest the Invitations is a reissue and not one from the crossover of labels period?

[Amsterdam Russ]

Not convinced it's a reissue. A repress, perhaps, but not a reissue. 

Looking through the MGM discography shows the new branding was first used in 1967. Not on labels, but the new lion head design appears on 45rpm picture covers and album covers. For example:

Robie Porter's "That's the way love goes"

https://www.discogs.com/master/1111867-Robie-Porter-Thats-The-Way-Love-Goes-Yesterday-Years/image/SW1hZ2U6MTY1NzkwNDU=

Robie Porter's "You could end the world"

https://www.discogs.com/release/14256038-Robie-Porter-You-Could-End-The-World-Softly-As-I-Leave-You-/image/SW1hZ2U6OTM2OTYzNjI=

Eric Burdon's "The best of..." LP

https://www.discogs.com/release/6469935-Eric-Burdon-And-The-Animals-The-Best-Of-Eric-Burdon-And-The-Animals-Vol-II/image/SW1hZ2U6NDc1ODI1NTM=

All three were released in 1967. Thus it does seem possible a transition period did go on through 1967 and 68.

The Formations "At the top of the stairs", which first saw chart action in Feb 1968, came out on both the 'old' MGM label and the new one. We know it could take weeks or even months for a 45 to break in any chart, thus it could easily have been pressed late 67. In support of that, Billboard mentions that track twice in its Feb 17 1968 edition - once as a new release and as a track that was having a regional breakout. If it was getting strong regional airplay in the week prior to Feb 17th, then it had certainly been pressed in January (maybe even earlier) and subsequently distributed to radio stations late January/ very early Feb 1968

Of course, another possibility is that the initial run might have sold out and it was pressed again, this time with the new logo.

The Invitations' track saw no national chart action (Billboard/Record World/ Cash box). But, if there was some regional action here and there, a repress might have been needed - and this time done with the new label design.

For MGM to wait something like a year and decide to reissue a flop doesn't make sense.

 

 

[chuffinnora]

  On 08/05/2023 at 18:15, Amsterdam Russ said:

Not convinced it's a reissue. A repress, perhaps, but not a reissue. 

Looking through the MGM discography shows the new branding was first used in 1967. Not on labels, but the new lion head design appears on 45rpm picture covers and album covers. For example:

Robie Porter's "That's the way love goes"

https://www.discogs.com/master/1111867-Robie-Porter-Thats-The-Way-Love-Goes-Yesterday-Years/image/SW1hZ2U6MTY1NzkwNDU=

Robie Porter's "You could end the world"

https://www.discogs.com/release/14256038-Robie-Porter-You-Could-End-The-World-Softly-As-I-Leave-You-/image/SW1hZ2U6OTM2OTYzNjI=

Eric Burdon's "The best of..." LP

https://www.discogs.com/release/6469935-Eric-Burdon-And-The-Animals-The-Best-Of-Eric-Burdon-And-The-Animals-Vol-II/image/SW1hZ2U6NDc1ODI1NTM=

All three were released in 1967. Thus it does seem possible a transition period did go on through 1967 and 68.

The Formations "At the top of the stairs", which first saw chart action in Feb 1968, came out on both the 'old' MGM label and the new one. We know it could take weeks or even months for a 45 to break in any chart, thus it could easily have been pressed late 67. In support of that, Billboard mentions that track twice in its Feb 17 1968 edition - once as a new release and as a track that was having a regional breakout. If it was getting strong regional airplay in the week prior to Feb 17th, then it had certainly been pressed in January (maybe even earlier) and subsequently distributed to radio stations late January/ very early Feb 1968

Of course, another possibility is that the initial run might have sold out and it was pressed again, this time with the new logo.

The Invitations' track saw no national chart action (Billboard/Record World/ Cash box). But, if there was some regional action here and there, a repress might have been needed - and this time done with the new label design.

For MGM to wait something like a year and decide to reissue a flop doesn't make sense.

 

 

Expand  

Hi all - this is really interesting stuff and glad to have started some interesting conversations.  I was interested as I could track down the rest of my old man's collection through the internet but not this one. Be good to find out if anyone else has a copy! I will still be playing the record regardless.....  

[Brunswick 58]

Went to buy an embers watch out girl until I discovered it was this design. Never heard of a black one

[The Yank]

I don't think you'll find the Embers on the black label MGM- the record was issued in 1970 which was a few years into the blue/gold swirl design. Here's a local station listing from 1970 with the 45 listed under the flip side  at # 10  -

[Tlscapital]

  On 09/05/2023 at 03:09, The Yank said:

I don't think you'll find the Embers on the black label MGM- the record was issued in 1970 which was a few years into the blue/gold swirl design. Here's a local station listing from 1970 with the 45 listed under the flip side  at # 10  -

Expand  

February 1967 !!! Was it repress to supply demand for a second 'revive' as a recent oldie... 

Edited May 9, 2023 by Tlscapital

[Chalky]

  On 09/05/2023 at 05:31, Tlscapital said:

February 1967 !!! Was it repress to supply demand for a second 'revive' as a recent oldie... 

Expand  

Topic back to the Embers again which is 1970

  On 08/05/2023 at 19:24, Brunswick 58 said:

Went to buy an embers watch out girl until I discovered it was this design. Never heard of a black one

Expand  

Never issued on Black label, they'd stopped using that label by the time of the Embers release

[Tlscapital]

DOH my bad... Evidently. My dislike for both records lead me to mix them up. Ever since that too. Although I love materials from both groups. My apologies to all. Back on track now. 

Edited May 9, 2023 by Tlscapital

[Chalky]

  On 09/05/2023 at 07:43, Tlscapital said:

DOH my bad... Evidently. My dislike for both records lead me to mix them up. Ever since that too. Although I love materials from both groups. My apologies to all. Back on track now. 

Expand  

Same for me other day, and little sleep for three days, wasn't paying full attention LOL