Steve Foran Posted March 1, 2018 Posted March 1, 2018 I recall that the recording was very poor on Like one, my question is was it on both Demo and Issue or just one of the formats? Hope someone can help please? Thanks Steve
Sammy Seaman Posted March 1, 2018 Posted March 1, 2018 Had both remember the issue being the better one of the 2
Marshman Posted March 1, 2018 Posted March 1, 2018 Not meaning to 'stir the pot' so to speak but I recently had a demo and sound quality on it was fine. So while demos are generally accepted as having lesser sound quality - it doesn't apply to all of them. I know that probably hinders more than helps but don't discount all demos out of hand - there are some 'good' ones out there....or 1 at least
Garethx Posted March 1, 2018 Posted March 1, 2018 These were pressed at two Decca plants. Gloversville NY and Pinckneyville IL. Pinckneyville used a ◆ symbol at the end of the b-side master number. Gloversville used a ✤ symbol at the end of the b-side master number. It would be interesting to find out if one of the plants was responsible for the poor quality pressings and the other for the better ones. 1
Bo Diddley Posted March 1, 2018 Posted March 1, 2018 (edited) On 01/03/2018 at 16:48, garethx said: These were pressed at two Decca plants. Gloversville NY and Pinckneyville IL. Pinckneyville used a ◆ symbol at the end of the b-side master number. Gloversville used a ✤ symbol at the end of the b-side master number. It would be interesting to find out if one of the plants was responsible for the poor quality pressings and the other for the better ones. Thanks for that Gareth My demo has the ✤ (as below) and sounds fine, although my wife claims I'm deaf I checked on youtube and found 2 posts by John Manship of the different pressings. To me, the one with the ✤ sounds better than the one with ◆. However, as mentioned, I am selectively deaf. Edited June 13 by Bo Diddley
Popular Post Zed1 Posted March 1, 2018 Popular Post Posted March 1, 2018 Yet another Fantastic piece of Northern Soul that sadly doesn't get anywhere near the plays it deserves because the Jukeboxes see fit to play the same tired old crap instead. 6
Tony Smith Posted March 1, 2018 Posted March 1, 2018 The MCA repress had the same fault, so I think it’s not down to stampers/ and pressing plants a flawed master recording, unlike the copy Ady C. found which has a different vocal take and much better mix
Ady Croasdell Posted March 2, 2018 Posted March 2, 2018 17 hours ago, Tony Smith said: The MCA repress had the same fault, so I think it’s not down to stampers/ and pressing plants a flawed master recording, unlike the copy Ady C. found which has a different vocal take and much better mix Just compared Tone and it's the backing vocals that are different and it's about 12 seconds longer. The tape we used on the Kent LP-Footstompers or Floorshakers was a good one of the 45 version 1
Benji Posted March 2, 2018 Posted March 2, 2018 Ady, did you find the alt version on tape or acetate? I recall Nancy Yahiro once found an acetate of a different mix. Think I got it on CD somewhere.
Ady Croasdell Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 Acetate, same bunch as Ben E King. Nancy may have had a tape of that
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!