Pervis Lee i don't care leeway original 45 ???

[Salvosoul]

Hi

Just buy on eBay a 45 pervis lee i don't care on 45 leeway 

Can you help me because i think that this 45 it is not original 

Always look on lp

There are 45 original issue in usa

Thank for help

 

[Russoul1]

was watching this 45, think it was unissued on 45, was done on a limited test press

 

 

 

[Salvosoul]

https://m.ebay.com/itm/Northern-Soul-45-Pervis-Lee-You-Dont-Care-Leeway-VG-mp3-/311752810132?nav=WATCHING_ENDED

[pow wow mik]

It's a recent press - a boot

 

[Salvosoul]

15 hours ago, salvosoul said:

Yes boot confirmed by dealers money redund . Thank 

[Corbett80]

If that was the real deal it would be worth a small fortune I would of thought!

 

[Andreas B]

It's boot, done in 2014. Tons knocking about, no reason to be paying more than a tenner for it. Why multiple people would bid it up that high when there's copies every other week on ebay and other sites is beyond me.

[Guest Peppe]

In these times it seems that people don't care (or don't know?) about bootlegs, repress, little difference or not at all in prices between G or VG- and M- records etc., record business, especially on ebay, is going mad, anyway yes, this is a bootleg, I'm surprised that seller didn't mention it.

[NEV]

"DON'T CARE " ,OH THE IRONY

[Corbett80]

I would of thought that has been bid on with some buyers thinking it is a rare 45 release of it, rather than not caring if it is a boot.

Especially as it is through such a reputable ebay auction.

[Northern Soul Uk]

Do we 1000% know that the 7" was a boot? It was never released on a single yes, but was an album track on 2 albums.
Anyway this is the reply that I have put on Discogs. Let me know what you think (I'm sure you will) :-)

" Not necessarily unofficial. If the guy or his family are still alive, and decided to put out the single, that they own copyright for, that makes it official. Also look at the label name and the name of the album? 'LEE'WAY'? as in 'Lee' as in his name Pervis Lee. No one really knows by the looks of things, but I have seen many releases like this where the actual artist or Kin, has decided to release a track or an album themselves and using their own name or similar, for the Label. I will understand if you know the artist or his family and they have told you that it is Definitely unofficial, but without that it's all guess work. Another couple of points. Look at the money that the 'Leeway' album is going for on the same label? hardly likely to be a boot for that money. And the original album that the track appeared on in 1970 'Himself'? No label??? HIGHLY likely that that was 'HIimself' that released it on a limited Promo press just to raise some cash maybe or to get his name out there. Stuff happens"

Edited January 9, 2017 by Northern Soul UK

[Mark Howell]

I read somewhere it was a boot done in Belgium?

 

[Paul Shirley]

Researched it to death its a boot withoubt a doubt

Edited January 16, 2017 by P S original

[Tattoodave]

A couple more on eBay, both far more than I'd want to pay for a new boot.

[Guest randy]

The Pervis Lee 45 from a couple of years back is a licensed release pressed by Record Shack in Germany. The A side is a shorter more dance floor friendly edit never before released and the flip side is the original longer LP version.

Along with the standard large hole issue copy (which are all stamped promo) there are a small number of UK style small hole white label test press with hand written credits. 

[Tim Smithers]

So the A side is the lp track , with the end faded out then ? just what I used to do with the lp if that's the case 

[Guest randy]

NO

To my hears The instrumental part in the middle of the record has been shortened plus the end fade out is a little quicker

[Chalky]

5 minutes ago, randy said:

NO

To my hears The instrumental part in the middle of the record has been shortened plus the end fade out is a little quicker

But it is still an edit rather than a different take.

[Guest randy]

Yes Chalky I said it was an edit above see above comments