Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know that this is quite a rare record, but I also know a lot of people who say that they have owned an original.

Have they all at one point owned the same record, or are there more copies about than first thought, or is it the more likely option that there is a 1970's bootleg that they have unsuspectingly owned without knowing....

I have see 2 copies that look the same one has a matrix   B9001-A  and the other in   B9001-A P.B.

 

Posted
  On 28/02/2016 at 10:57, chalky said:

The one with P.B. is the bootleg, came from Soussan.

Expand  

Cheers Chalky, so the P.B. is a boot and not a second official press then, as someone on Discogs is selling a P.B. copy for £480.00 and thinks it is maga rare as it has the P.B. I think they must have been sniffing glue

  • Helpful 1
Posted (edited)
  On 28/02/2016 at 13:10, Andyontherock said:

Cheers Chalky, so the P.B. is a boot and not a second official press then, as someone on Discogs is selling a P.B. copy for £480.00 and thinks it is maga rare as it has the P.B. I think they must have been sniffing glue

Expand  

The same as the other boots from Soussan, George Blackwell, Salvadors etc, PB in the run out.  The boots are pretty rare though.

I've seen a list of Soussan's from I think 1975 with this on for a fiver so was a pretty rare record then when compared with other items on the list.

Edited by chalky
Posted

Can't get over people paying that sort of money for a boot, knowing that it is a boot!!!

Doesn't matter how rare the bootleg is, its still a forgery and not original, I would sooner make a carver for £10 to play at home than pay over £400.00 for something that is not an original.

Bizarre this Northern soul world we live in :g:

  • Helpful 1
Posted (edited)
  On 28/02/2016 at 16:05, Andyontherock said:

Can't get over people paying that sort of money for a boot, knowing that it is a boot!!!

Doesn't matter how rare the bootleg is, its still a forgery and not original, I would sooner make a carver for £10 to play at home than pay over £400.00 for something that is not an original.

Bizarre this Northern soul world we live in :g:

Expand  

They probably don't realise it is a boot, looks almost identical to the original.

Edited by chalky
Posted

When talking to Dave about it I understood he found it a bit later, after the one Soussan had, although it would still be relatively unknown.  Was Dave who told me about the boot.

Posted
  On 29/02/2016 at 08:38, KevH said:

Spot on Mick. Dave R discovery.

Expand  

No..was played and known before Dave found a copy some time later (which i saw & we discussed some 20 years ago) i think was a SS discovery and remember being played briefly at Wigan ( had it on tape) at least before being booted in limited quantity..


Posted

this along with eddie rey - something of value ,,,eddie foster - I  never knew (multi coloured) are among the rarest reissues..

you just never see them ..

the price is bound is go up after time as they themselves become collectors items

 

Posted
  On 29/02/2016 at 19:58, SHEFFSOUL said:

No..was played and known before Dave found a copy some time later (which i saw & we discussed some 20 years ago) i think was a SS discovery and remember being played briefly at Wigan ( had it on tape) at least before being booted in limited quantity..

Expand  

ok,must have misunderstood the conversation.

Posted

Sold mine a year or so ago and achieved a similar price but mine was EX if i remember rightly. Nice record wish i could of kept it. Never seen a boot of it in the flesh.

  • Helpful 1
Posted (edited)
  On 02/03/2016 at 13:40, Mister Fish said:

I asked him/her was told it was original.

Expand  

Righto Steve. Thanks for clarifying. I would have found it odd if people hadn't verified the authenticity with the seller.

Edited by markw
Posted

I think it was one that was booted "in anticipation" of demand, which never came. Like the "Uncle in Florida" would send it over for plays at The Casino, and press it up thinking the demand would follow, but it didn't. A bit like "Moving forward" Nat T Jones which is also not common on a pressing. 

  • Helpful 2
Posted

But do you agree with the theory of the pressings being done in anticipation of it being hammered by the jocks? And they weren't so the pressings never sold. 

  • Helpful 2
Posted
  On 02/03/2016 at 16:22, Steve G said:

But do you agree with the theory of the pressings being done in anticipation of it being hammered by the jocks? And they weren't so the pressings never sold. 

Expand  

That is the most likely reason for the boots Steve.  Soussan had sent it over and also listed it for a fiver...unfortunately probably too left field for Wigan at the time.

  • Helpful 2

Posted

I should point out that there were hardly ANY boots of Eddie Daniels back then. The record came into conversation quite a bit but no one I knew had a copy, not even Colin Curtis and he loved it. If there were bootlegs of it, then they certainly didn't filter onto the scene back then. I don't think there could have been any more than a handful. There was a massive amount of bootleg paranoia at the time. I received a George Blackwell 'original' from Soussan but didn't take any enjoyment from it because I thought it was a boot, so it went in a swap deal. But guess what? I never saw any more after that. So these were not titles that were bootlegged in any quantity that's for sure. 

Ian D :)

 

 

  • Helpful 1

Get involved with Soul Source

Add your comments now

Join Soul Source

A free & easy soul music affair!

Join Soul Source now!

Log in to Soul Source

Jump right back in!

Log in now!


×
×
  • Create New...