Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi, can someone please help?
I have aquired 2 copies of Rufus Lumley - I'm standing, both on the 'Holton' label.
Both labels are a different lay out, one has the matrix number in small text and has the runout scratched in 'SY4M 6588',
and the other copy has the matrix number in larger text and then the info in smaller text, and SKUM-6588 on the run out and 'A1' twice.
What is the difference between the 2 does anyone know?

 

post-9727-0-87404300-1421064571_thumb.jp post-9727-0-58824600-1421064575_thumb.jp

Edited by Northern Soul UK
  • Replies 28
  • Views 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Most active in this topic

Posted

This has been VERY difficult to photograph as its a feint scratch, but yes it's definitely a 'U' not a '4'

 

attachicon.gifSKUM.jpg

I would think that this is a poor attempt to counterfeit then. The original is stamped and there should also be a stamped "R"

  • Helpful 1
Posted

Original also has an upside down capitol R  stamped in the runout.

Posted

Not to worry, get it on Ebay if your lucky it may attract an idiot!

Posted

I don't remember this being booted twice, have a real good check of the darker red one's run off

 

Pete I always thought once in the 70 and then again in the 90s. The 70s one looking more like the original.

Posted

Pete, by the darker red one, which do you mean? the one with the round sticker on or the one without?

Original is a very rich/deep red & proper black. The 70s boot is wishy-washy in colour compared to it.


Posted (edited)

So is the verdict that both of mine are boots, and booted by different bootleggers?

Definitely not originals.

Do both labels look like proper labels?.......what I mean is, not photocopied A4 cut-outs and stuck on with pritt or something?

 

Edited....cos sometimes i`m an illiterate bastard and I don`t check my typing!  :)

Edited by Guest
Posted

Definitely not originals.

Do both labels look like proper labels?.......what I mean is, not photocopied A4 cut-outs and stuck on with pritt or something?

 

Edited....cos sometimes i`m an illiterate bastard and I don`t check my typing!  :)

But you are a Claret supporter so you are excused this time. :thumbsup:

Posted

Both proper labels deffo, but one (the one without the sticker) is fairly faded compared to the other, the other is a rich red colour with no fading.

 

Don't you wish you'd have got British?

Get involved with Soul Source

Add your comments now

Join Soul Source

A free & easy soul music affair!

Join Soul Source now!

Log in to Soul Source

Jump right back in!

Log in now!

Source Advert





×
×
  • Create New...