Andreas B Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Lets see how many soul artist covers we can compile of the Jackie Wilson classic Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Robbk Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 There were no "covers" of Jackie Wilson's "(You're Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher". I suppose, one might term Wilson's version a "cover" of The Dells' version. There were some re-makes of it. I remember a female single artist having a hit with it in 1974 or 1975. I can't remember her name. I didn't pay any attention to music made after 1970, other than what we did at Airwave Records (and I didn't pay nearly enough attention to THAT). Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
boba Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 i disagree. the jackie wilson song rips off the dells song but it's not exactly the same. and even if it were exactly the same, there still could be "covers" of wilson's interpretation of the song. 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Godzilla Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Otis Redding's version is surely a cover. Jimmy Cliff's too, although admittedly not a soul cut. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Robbk Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 A "cover" of a song is a release that comes out during the original run of a released record, to take advantage of its recognition by the public, and get more sales from that recognition (e.g. "steal sales"). That was done much in the early to mid 1950s by producers of Caucasian artists to sell songs performed by Black artists to the Pop market (White audiences). It was also done by artists of other music genres using a song from a different genre. I don't remember any covers of "(Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher" (e.g. no other versions out at the same time). The same song sung by another artist after the original has finished its run is NOT a "cover" (except in the sense that "I COULD care less" now means "I COULDN'T care less"). I'm not against languages changing over time, EXCEPT in the case of a change in meaning being totally illogical AND also erasing the meaning of a word and leaving the language with no replacement word for that word. If "cover" now means what we used to call "remake", then there is no longer a word to represent the original meaning of that particular meaning of "cover". Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Roburt Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) i disagree. the jackie wilson song rips off the dells song but it's not exactly the same. and even if it were exactly the same, there still could be "covers" of wilson's interpretation of the song. The Jackie Wilson version of "Higher & Higher" was developed from the Chess / Dells recorded 'original song'. Carl Smith was pissed off that even though he had given Chess Records good service for some time, they wouldn't help him out with his medical bills when he fell ill in 67. So he 'jumped ship' and went across to Brunswick taking the 'almost finished' song with him. The Dells cut their version of the original song for Chess and it went onto the group's next LP. Across at Brunswick, the team there took the song Carl Smith had fetched with him, developed it to suit JW and cut Jackie on it. It was released on 45 & became an instant big hit. Coz the JW version was in the charts, the Dells take on the song just remained an album track. Seems litigation was soon instigated & (I believe) the credited writers of the song (on JW's version) had to be amended. Carl Smith wasn't too well liked afterwards and soon headed off to Memphis to get a (short-lived) position at Stax. AT LEAST THAT'S THE VERSION OF THE STORY I GOT FROM CARL back in the 80's when he was running his own Anita Record label out of Memphis. Other versions of the story exist, one being that a copy of the part finished song was found written on waste paper picked from a Chess Records dustbin & it being 'lifted' and taken to the guys at Brunswick. But all the versions acknowledge that the song was initially developed over at Chess Records. Edited August 14, 2013 by Roburt Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Cover-up Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 It maybe doesn't really count, but there's Erma Franklin's version (same backing track) which was unreleased till it came out on a Kent comp LP... But you'd expect there to be hundreds of covers, yet my mind's blank! Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Robbk Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Otis Redding's version is surely a cover. Jimmy Cliff's too, although admittedly not a soul cut. Were those versions out at the same time as Jackie's? If so, then they were covers. If not, they weren't. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
boba Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) The Jackie Wilson version of "Higher & Higher" was developed from the Chess / Dells recorded 'original song'. Carl Smith was pissed off that even though he had given Chess Records good service for some time, they wouldn't help him out with his medical bills when he fell ill in 67. So he 'jumped ship' and went across to Brunswick taking the 'almost finished' song with him. The Dells cut their version of the original song for Chess and it went onto the group's next LP. Across at Brunswick, the team there took the song Carl Smith had fetched with him, developed it to suit JW and cut Jackie on it. It was released on 45 & became an instant big hit. Coz the JW version was in the charts, the Dells take on the song just remained an album track. Seems litigation was soon instigated & (I believe) the credited writers of the song (on JW's version) had to be amended. Carl Smith wasn't too well liked afterwards and soon headed off to Memphis to get a (short-lived) position at Stax. AT LEAST THAT'S THE VERSION OF THE STORY I GOT FROM CARL back in the 80's when he was running his own Anita Record label out of Memphis. this doesn't contradict what i said. it's not an identical song but it rips off (or is "developed from") the original. and like i said, even if it were identical, that doesn't mean people aren't covering jackie wilson's version since it soundwise isn't identical to the dells and nobody heard the dells. similar to how ruben studdard covered luther vandross' version of "superstar", he probably never heard the carpenters and it doesn't sound at all like the carpenters. Edited August 14, 2013 by boba Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Robbk Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 this doesn't contradict what i said. it's not an identical song but it rips off (or is "developed from") the original. and like i said, even if it were identical, that doesn't mean people aren't covering jackie wilson's version since it soundwise isn't identical to the dells and nobody heard the dells. similar to how ruben studdard covered luther vandross' version of "superstar", he probably never heard the carpenters and it doesn't sound at all like the carpenters. Then those people singing versions of the song Jackie sang, are doing remakes of his version (as opposed to "covering" that song. The choice of the word "cover" to be used as a term for releasing another version of the same songg at the time the original is out, was to imply that that second version's release replaced the original as the big seller (effectively covering up its recognition by the public-and changing that recognition to the newer version). Naturally, that wasn't always the intention of covering a record, but it was used first mainly as a "negative" term. It didn't always hurt the original artist. It often gave the Black artist recognition in the Pop market, which he or she hadn't had before. That led to more work and bigger fees for appearances. But, it DID often hurt sales of the original record. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Sunnysoul Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 With the greatest respect to Robb, let's take some literary licence here and respond to Andreas' original post. Otis Redding's "cover" must have been released (posthumously) only about a year or two after Jackie's hit. and of all the many cover versions, Otis' cover is one of the best, if not the best: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1odvp-_bhk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7L7EhD8x0Q 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Roburt Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) Back in 1967/68, every local (& most national hit) soul acts filled there live shows with 'covers'. If a new act had a hit 45, they would be rushed into the studio to cut a 'quick album' and many songs included on the album would be covers of songs they were performing live at the time. ............. JUST ABOUT EVERY ACT that played the Wheel in 1967/ 1968 would perform "Knock On Wood" for instance. Lots of soul singers (solo & groups) have told me what songs they used to include in their acts back in those days and the likes of "Open The Door", Motown stuff from the Temptations, 4 Tops & Miracles, JB stuff, Stax & Atlantic stuff, J & B Purify songs, "Knock On Wood" and the like get regular mentions. ANYWAY, many local US TV stations had black music shows & I'm guessing that around Sept / Oct / Nov 67 lots of acts on those shows would have done live versions of "Higher & Higher". Unfortunately none of those clips seem to have survived down the years. Edited August 14, 2013 by Roburt Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kegsy Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Why would anyone want to cover/remake such an iconic record. Nobody else could really do it justice and any attempt to do so would be doomed to failure as Jackie's version is just soooo memorable. Its like somebody trying to do Hard to Handle or such like. kegsy 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Sunnysoul Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) Why would anyone want to cover/remake such an iconic record. Nobody else could really do it justice and any attempt to do so would be doomed to failure as Jackie's version is just soooo memorable. Its like somebody trying to do Hard to Handle or such like. kegsy For the same reason that there have been a million covers of You've Lost That Loving Feeling, Sunny, Light My Fire and so on ....... Performers want to perform the greatest songs and have often achieved even greater commercial and chart success than the original version, that's why ! Edited August 14, 2013 by sunnysoul Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Godzilla Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 I'm not against languages changing over time, EXCEPT in the case of a change in meaning being totally illogical AND also erasing the meaning of a word and leaving the language with no replacement word for that word. If "cover" now means what we used to call "remake", then there is no longer a word to represent the original meaning of that particular meaning of "cover". Well it's changed now. Get over it grandad Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kegsy Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) For the same reason that there have been a million covers of You've Lost That Loving Feeling, Sunny, Light My Fire and so on ....... How many million selling covers of the above ? Kegsy Edited August 14, 2013 by Kegsy Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Sunnysoul Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) How many million selling covers of the above ? Kegsy I was only making the point that covers are a staple part of the music industry. As for songs being made into a big hit chart hits on more than one occasion by different artists ... off the top of my head ... in the soul context ... here's a few : Grapevine - Gladys Knight / Marvin Gaye / Creedence Clearwater Respect - Otis / Aretha My Girl - Temptations / Otis Never Can Say Goodbye - Jacksons / Isaac Hayes / Communards (!) and so on and so on ... just the Motown songbook alone has produced numerous multiple hit covers. Edited August 14, 2013 by sunnysoul Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Roburt Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) Its like somebody trying to do Hard to Handle or such like. kegsy Kegsy, the only thing I can recall being 'hard to handle' is you old chap !! Off to 'Sandbanks' with Mr. Temple in just over two weeks ....... life can be 'hard to handle' at times. Edited August 14, 2013 by Roburt Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Steve Foran Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Didnt Linda Ronstadt do it? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Epic Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 It was Rita Coolidge. 2 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Mick Holdsworth Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 There's two versions by Dana Valery on her Brunswick LPs, both use the same backing track as Jackie Wilson 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Dave Pinch Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 There's two versions by Dana Valery on her Brunswick LPs, both use the same backing track as Jackie Wilson i think its on her 1972 lp on brunswick `not the flower`.....is it on another lp mick?..rita coolidge hit in 77 reaching no 2 in the usa making it a bigger hit than jackies...probably only me but does anyone else think higher and higher is not as good as some of his other 45`s around that time 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
The Yank Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Martha Reeves remade the song for Arista around '75/ '76. 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Andreas B Posted August 14, 2013 Author Share Posted August 14, 2013 A "cover" of a song is a release that comes out during the original run of a released record, to take advantage of its recognition by the public, and get more sales from that recognition (e.g. "steal sales"). That was done much in the early to mid 1950s by producers of Caucasian artists to sell songs performed by Black artists to the Pop market (White audiences). It was also done by artists of other music genres using a song from a different genre. I don't remember any covers of "(Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher" (e.g. no other versions out at the same time). The same song sung by another artist after the original has finished its run is NOT a "cover" (except in the sense that "I COULD care less" now means "I COULDN'T care less"). I'm not against languages changing over time, EXCEPT in the case of a change in meaning being totally illogical AND also erasing the meaning of a word and leaving the language with no replacement word for that word. If "cover" now means what we used to call "remake", then there is no longer a word to represent the original meaning of that particular meaning of "cover". So then how irksome is it when someone calls a recording a "cover version"? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) Personally I think Otis Readings version is pants!! I think he murders it to death. Edited August 14, 2013 by Guest Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Robbk Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 What a quaint idiomatic phrase! is the phrase "is pants" an update of "the cat's pajamas"? Or does it mean "in the toilet"? Which hovercraft is full of eels? Do you really own one? I'm Hungarian on my father's side. 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Roburt Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 A cut 'is pants' Bob means it's awful. And I go with you, a cover really is a quick copy done at the time of the original version to try to steal sales with a soundalike crap copy. Loads of UK beat bands did 'covers' in the 60's after white Yanks had done similar (to the 'black' original version) back in the 50's. A white version sold (as a R&R tune) coz it got played on all the US radio stns whereas the black original sold few coz no-one ever knew (back then) that it existed. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Mick Holdsworth Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 i think its on her 1972 lp on brunswick `not the flower`.....is it on another lp mick?..rita coolidge hit in 77 reaching no 2 in the usa making it a bigger hit than jackies...probably only me but does anyone else think higher and higher is not as good as some of his other 45`s around that time Yes Dave, it's an Italian LP version of "Not The Flower" released only in Italy on Brunswick. It has all the "Flower" tracks plus either two or four others - same backing tracks as it's US counterpart, but all vocals recorded in Italian. Cheers Mick 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Robbk Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 A cut 'is pants' Bob means it's awful. And I go with you, a cover really is a quick copy done at the time of the original version to try to steal sales with a soundalike crap copy. Loads of UK beat bands did 'covers' in the 60's after white Yanks had done similar (to the 'black' original version) back in the 50's. A white version sold (as a R&R tune) coz it got played on all the US radio stns whereas the black original sold few coz no-one ever knew (back then) that it existed. Or (very often) your lily-White parents didn't ALLOW you to bring a record made by a Black artist into the house. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Robbk Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 A cut 'is pants' Bob means it's awful. And I go with you, a cover really is a quick copy done at the time of the original version to try to steal sales with a soundalike crap copy. Loads of UK beat bands did 'covers' in the 60's after white Yanks had done similar (to the 'black' original version) back in the 50's. A white version sold (as a R&R tune) coz it got played on all the US radio stns whereas the black original sold few coz no-one ever knew (back then) that it existed. Does anyone here know the origin (derivation) of that idiom? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Robbk Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 I looked it up. It was a schoolboy (public school?) phrase originated from "a pile of (e.g. smelly/unwashed) pants". Interesting! 1 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 I looked it up. It was a schoolboy (public school?) phrase originated from "a pile of (e.g. smelly/unwashed) pants". Interesting! Or "Caught with its pants down" My hovercraft is full of eels is from Monty Pythons sketch about the "Dirty Hungarian phrasebook" Rob. Now lest get this thread back on track Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Simon T Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) There were no "covers" of Jackie Wilson's "(You're Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher". I suppose, one might term Wilson's version a "cover" of The Dells' version. There were some re-makes of it. I remember a female single artist having a hit with it in 1974 or 1975. I can't remember her name. I didn't pay any attention to music made after 1970, other than what we did at Airwave Records (and I didn't pay nearly enough attention to THAT). (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher The Dells 1968 (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher written by Gary Jackson, Carl William Smith - English Title Performer Release date 1 (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher Jackie Wilson 1967 2 Higher and Higher Otis Redding June 20, 1969 3 (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher Gene Pitney 1972 4 Higher and Higher (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Bette Midler November 1973 5 Higher and Higher Geoff Muldaur 1975 6 (Your Love Has Lifted Me) Higher and Higher Esther Phillips 1976 7 (Your Love Has Lifted Me) Higher and Higher The Chanter Sisters 1976 8 (Your Love Has Lifted Me) Higher and Higher Dolly Parton February 1977 9 (Your Love Has Lifted Me) Higher and Higher Barbara Mandrell December 1977 10 Higher & Higher (Your Love Has Lifted Me) Rita Coolidge 1977 11 Higher and Higher Bobby Darin 1987 12 Higher and Higher Beau Williams 1991 13 Hold On Big Daddy 1991 14 (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher Jimmy Barnes 1991 15 Higher and Higher Mint Juleps 1994 16 Higher and Higher Flash Cadillac 1994 17 Higher & Higher Jimmy Cliff 1996 18 (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher Chris Ardoin and Double Clutchin' 1998 19 Higher and Higher Eric Bibb 2003 20 Higher and Higher Butch Wax and The Hollywoods 2005 21 Your Love Keeps Lifting Me (Higher and Higher) Steve Brookstein 2005 22 (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher Michael McDonald December 25, 2007 23 Higher and Higher Tomas Nicholas 2007 24 Higher and Higher Eddie Money 2007 25 (Your Love Keeps Lifting Me) Higher and Higher Rod Stewart October 23, 2009 Edited August 14, 2013 by simon t 2 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Dave Pinch Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 naturally otis reddings version would be recorded in 1967 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Roburt Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 As well as the 'secondhandsongs' web site, there's this one that plays the Beau Williams modern version off against Jackie's 1967 version. I really like many of the tracks that Beau cut down the years (lots with Johnny Pate & similar decent producers). His version of H&H is off one of his gospel LP's (as the backing vocals illustrate) .............. .. https://www.whosampled.com/cover/54849/Beau-Williams-Higher-and-Higher-Jackie-Wilson-(Your-Love-Keeps-Lifting-Me)-Higher-and-Higher/ Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Roburt Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Howard Huntsberry also did a version (its a bit too dramatic for me) ...... https://www.whosampled.com/cover/54854/Howard-Huntsberry-Higher-and-Higher-Jackie-Wilson-(Your-Love-Keeps-Lifting-Me)-Higher-and-Higher/ Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
boba Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 sorry, didn't intend to turn this thread into a discussion of semantics / splitting hairs Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Mark B Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 There is also this one by the moving finger https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TbyaTkWD9tY&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DTbyaTkWD9tY Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Pomonkey Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 See this come up every now and then, wimpy Mexican version https://www.ebay.com/itm/LOS-HITTERS-higher-higher-LATIN-SOUL-1968-MEXICO-jackie-wilson-/281151290095?pt=Music_on_Vinyl&hash=item4175ec3aef Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Soul-slider Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 The Jaggerz (Gamble 4008) Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Md Records Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 "Canada Goose" on "Tonsil" records - another second rate version. Seems every man and his dog had a crack at this tune!! Des Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest penny Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Then those people singing versions of the song Jackie sang, are doing remakes of his version (as opposed to "covering" that song. The choice of the word "cover" to be used as a term for releasing another version of the same songg at the time the original is out, was to imply that that second version's release replaced the original as the big seller (effectively covering up its recognition by the public-and changing that recognition to the newer version). Naturally, that wasn't always the intention of covering a record, but it was used first mainly as a "negative" term. It didn't always hurt the original artist. It often gave the Black artist recognition in the Pop market, which he or she hadn't had before. That led to more work and bigger fees for appearances. But, it DID often hurt sales of the original record. Love the pedantry, but the term 'cover version' , at least in the uk, has been used now for so long just to mean a remake that I doubt anyone even knows the original meaning you describe. Whether you like it or not, the use of the word has changed and it's now synonymous with 'remake'. Over here we have the term 'covers bands' even, for bands who play other peoples songs. Interesting info though cheers Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest penny Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Why would anyone want to cover/remake such an iconic record. Nobody else could really do it justice and any attempt to do so would be doomed to failure as Jackie's version is just soooo memorable. Its like somebody trying to do Hard to Handle or such like. kegsy Well, otis himself did a pretty good version, as has been mentioned, and patti drew did a pretty good version of otis' s 'hard to handle'. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Steve G Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 A good list so far, but it's not over yet....... and I guess you just can predict I'll come in with a Scepter cover. Bobby Boyd & The Playboys "Higher & higher" at the beginning of 1969. White R&B cover by the guy that became a country artist. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Mick Holdsworth Posted August 19, 2013 Share Posted August 19, 2013 Not exactly "Higher and Higher", but there is a pop track by Bobby Vee called "Just Keep It Up", that is so close to the original tune it could easily be mistaken for "Higher and Higher" Mick Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!