Ik001 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Can anyone out there enlighten me on this one. Is it an original? Vinyl but no sharp edge as per Mr. Manships guide. It looks Kosher to me but any other input would be most appreciated. Many thanks, in anticipation. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Headsy Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 its a second press from the 70s. allegedly legal ????? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kev John Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 (edited) Matrix for the original reads K - 11440 - 1 ecthed in then a V stamped in then LW & AT & W etched in Karen logo @ 12 o'clock read matrix from 6 o'clock position L 2 R finishes with the W mark @ 9 o'clock position The Karen Logo is larger on the Original , looks small on your'e scan Hope this helps you atb Kev Edited January 23, 2013 by Kev John Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kev John Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Can anyone out there enlighten me on this one. Is it an original? Vinyl but no sharp edge as per Mr. Manships guide. It looks Kosher to me but any other input would be most appreciated. Many thanks, in anticipation. It's deffo second press Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Ik001 Posted January 23, 2013 Author Share Posted January 23, 2013 Hi Kev has the k-11440-11 @ 9-oclock a w or m mark @ 11-clock and then looks like delta ??? @ 6-clock. Can't tell in this F#####g light. Maybe have to wait till daylight. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kev John Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 (edited) Hi Kev has the k-11440-11 @ 9-oclock a w or m mark @ 11-clock and then looks like delta ??? @ 6-clock. Can't tell in this F#####g light. Maybe have to wait till daylight. the 2 11 marks after the 11440 tell me it's the second press from 7ts also the Karen Logo is to small it's larger on the orig & the blue colour of the label is wrong to dark Edited January 23, 2013 by Kev John Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Ik001 Posted January 23, 2013 Author Share Posted January 23, 2013 Thanks for the info. Good job I only paid £11 for it. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kev John Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Thanks for the info. Good job I only paid £11 for it. You did'nt get done orig goes for over 200 quid Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Ik001 Posted January 23, 2013 Author Share Posted January 23, 2013 Yes, but this guy put it on (evil bay) as original but the photo was bad and I asked him about the edge of the record. No loss though I'll stick it back on, should get my money back plus a little bit more maybe. Best, Ian Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Kev John Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 (edited) Yes, but this guy put it on (evil bay) as original but the photo was bad and I asked him about the edge of the record. No loss though I'll stick it back on, should get my money back plus a little bit more maybe. Best, Ian Good luck with it ian atb Kev Edited January 23, 2013 by Kev John Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!