Mike Posted February 19, 2006 Posted February 19, 2006 anyone got a scan of above , noticed other week a wd with bit different font wise at bottom than own after a gander at one with large font at bottom ta mike
Nick Hackett Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 (edited) . Edited November 2, 2011 by nick hackett
Mike Posted February 20, 2006 Author Posted February 20, 2006 Is it this one Mike? yep cheers pikey noticed was a diference between own and one up for sale, thanks for posting scan as its all clear now had it in me head for some reason that own was a wd but when took time to have a proper look come clear when reliased derrr.... was a issue always consider this a fine example of sleazy northern was told a old searling play, any more background ? talking about other version by sisters three at w/end said will post sound clip will do in a bit if can find different approach to it complelty thanks mike
Chalky Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 always consider this a fine example of sleazy northern was told a old searling play, any more background ? talking about other version by sisters three at w/end said will post sound clip will do in a bit if can find different approach to it complelty thanks mike Whats the Sisters Three called Mike, You Can Forget It? Dunno about CYQ being old Searling spin but defffo had spins in the 80's. Almost as good as Someone to Love by him
Mike Posted February 20, 2006 Author Posted February 20, 2006 Whats the Sisters Three called Mike, You Can Forget It? Dunno about CYQ being old Searling spin but defffo had spins in the 80's. Almost as good as Someone to Love by him yep its the flip of that, bit disapointing, perhaps as was expecting a sleazy female version hang on -searching for it someone to love just aint got that sleaze factor imo , soul with a snarl, attitude thing here s sisters 3 take on itCan You Qualify Sisters Three.mp3
Chalky Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 yep its the flip of that, bit disapointing, perhaps as was expecting a sleazy female version hang on -searching for it someone to love just aint got that sleaze factor imo , soul with a snarl, attitude thing here s sisters 3 take on it pretty poor really Mike. Just listened to the other side and the intro to that is similiar to Ozz & Spurling take of CYQ.
Mike Posted February 20, 2006 Author Posted February 20, 2006 pretty poor really Mike. Just listened to the other side and the intro to that is similiar to Ozz & Spurling take of CYQ. must be some connection, havent sister 3 anymore so cant check, anyone know ?
Guest Stuart T Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 (edited) must be some connection, havent sister 3 anymore so cant check, anyone know ? Same label owners I think, both San Francisco? Not the only two in the label group either, Dave Frynn points out on Anorak's Corner that El Camino has the same label details and typeface as Goldenway. Didn't they get bought by Fantasy in the end? Sure Ady C can tell us. Will never be able to find both at same time to check, if can will do so tonight. Sisters Three version of CYQ is dire though IMVHO Edited February 20, 2006 by Stuart T
Martint Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Sisters Three version of CYQ is dire though IMVHO quite agree but I love YCFI
Simon T Posted February 20, 2006 Posted February 20, 2006 Whats the Sisters Three called Mike, You Can Forget It?
Andyf Posted February 21, 2006 Posted February 21, 2006 Same label owners I think, both San Francisco? Not the only two in the label group either, Dave Frynn points out on Anorak's Corner that El Camino has the same label details and typeface as Goldenway. Didn't they get bought by Fantasy in the end? Sure Ady C can tell us. Will never be able to find both at same time to check, if can will do so tonight. Sisters Three version of CYQ is dire though IMVHO El Camino and Goldenway were funded by the same people.I Think CYQ maybe the only release on Goldenway. Jesse Osbourne was an A&R man for Galaxy/Fantasy which is presumably why Sisters Three got hold of CYQ
Guest rachel Posted February 23, 2006 Posted February 23, 2006 yep its the flip of that, bit disapointing, perhaps as was expecting a sleazy female version hang on -searching for it someone to love just aint got that sleaze factor imo , soul with a snarl, attitude thing here s sisters 3 take on it Blimey don't think I'd have recognised that as the same song (well maybe when they sang "Can You Qualify" )... quite like it in a laidback girl groupy sort of way but next to Ozz just doesn't compare... he is sleazy sounding alright
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!