Pete S Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 Someone has one of these over in sales at 500 quid. Why????
Cheapsiderecords Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 Because there are dicks out there that will pay it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
grant Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 Because there are dicks out there that will pay it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thought it was expensive when i paid a tenner for it at wigan
Guest Stuart T Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 Someone has one of these over in sales at 500 quid. Why???? Incredible. I thought prices were just getting more "sensible" (if they ever really were) again and then I see a record being offered at 30% more than the last time one was offered recently and didn't appear to sell. Its worse than house prices round here sometimes.
Pete S Posted December 15, 2005 Author Posted December 15, 2005 OK I've got a copy for sale now, £200 or thereabouts, any advance on £200?
Marc Forrest Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 sold mine 8 years ago now for the back then unbelievable high sum of 60 UKP But wouldn`t like to pay more today myself.
Blake H Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 It used to be a "Front page special" on Soul Bowl for..............85p If I knew then etc etc :angry: :angry: BH
Chalky Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 (edited) It used to be a "Front page special" on Soul Bowl for..............85p If I knew then etc etc :angry: :angry: BH Not only did Soul Bowl find 100's of these it also sold well locally over in the States. Personally wouldn't pay anymore than £50, not rare by any stretch of the imagination. Edited December 16, 2005 by chalky
Guest Baz Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Never understood why this has fectched any money at all.........biggest load of over-rated muck i can think of
Simsy Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 (edited) sold mine 8 years ago now for the back then unbelievable high sum of 60 UKP . Ditto, maybe couple years earlier for £15 . What a dick ... :angry: Edited December 16, 2005 by Simsy
Chalky Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Never understood why this has fectched any money at all.........biggest load of over-rated muck i can think of Personally think it's a great record, always loved it but it's been hammered
Guest gibber Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 OK I've got a copy for sale now, £200 or thereabouts, any advance on £200? Sean chapman had one in is sale box for £300
Guest Baz Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Personally think it's a great record, always loved it but it's been hammered Never really touched me for some reason, got all the credentials of a record i would love......male group from Chicago ( i think ) like you say you do hear this at most soul nights from hear to timbucktoo
Chalky Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Never really touched me for some reason, got all the credentials of a record i would love......male group from Chicago ( i think ) like you say you do hear this at most soul nights from hear to timbucktoo Ringleaders were from Saginaw, Michigan. Willie Hawkins, Vandy Lane, Edgar Donahue & Brent Anderson.
Guest Baz Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Ringleaders were from Saginaw, Michigan. Willie Hawkins, Vandy Lane, Edgar Donahue & Brent Anderson. Is M-Pac a Chicago lable
Guest Baz Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Yep Thought so, hence why i persumed they were from there
Guest Soulfood33 Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Not only did Soul Bowl find 100's of these it also sold well locally over in the States. Personally wouldn't pay anymore than £50, not rare by any stretch of the imagination. £1.50 on my oldest Soul Bowl list I could find: even then the price double almost double over night
Ted Massey Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Johnny Beggs and I were working for Pep in Wolverhampton a few years ago and we were saying what a great record it was and we both wanted it In comes Dave Kilworth witha small box first record out ringleaders £6 sorted
Guest StoneSoul45 Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Great cut! Personally, I like the flip better. Not a dancer but a really beautiful ballad. I don't really see it in Chicago much, never mint. I think all the clean stock copies went over to england in the 80s. BASTARDS! Theres two unreleased Ringleaders cuts out there on a bootleg 45. Highly recommended! The group was from Saginaw Michigan.
Chalky Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 got the acetate/studio cut somewhere, sounds so much better. anyone got the Rags To Riches from the acetate?
Guest Bearsoul Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Never understood why this has fectched any money at all.........biggest load of over-rated muck i can think of OTHER SIDE NOT BAD ..BAZ CHRIS M
Peter Richer Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 In answer to Pete's original question - 'why is it up for sale at £500?' - the sales thread that it was on had quite a few in demand records which people seemed to be gushing about, but the sample I checked (Martha Star, Ellusions, Ringleaders, Don Varner, Andrea Henry, Betty Lloyd etc.) all had prices directly taken from Manships Price Guide volume 3. The interesting thing was that not one person on that thread suggested any of the prices were too expensive! Presumably everyone's following the suggestion that sales prices should not be questioned on their originating thread, which is why Pete started a separate topic here to comment on the Ringleaders price. Either that or everyone now accepts that the Manship vol. 3 prices are just about right?!?
Pete S Posted December 17, 2005 Author Posted December 17, 2005 In answer to Pete's original question - 'why is it up for sale at £500?' - the sales thread that it was on had quite a few in demand records which people seemed to be gushing about, but the sample I checked (Martha Star, Ellusions, Ringleaders, Don Varner, Andrea Henry, Betty Lloyd etc.) all had prices directly taken from Manships Price Guide volume 3. The interesting thing was that not one person on that thread suggested any of the prices were too expensive! Presumably everyone's following the suggestion that sales prices should not be questioned on their originating thread, which is why Pete started a separate topic here to comment on the Ringleaders price. Either that or everyone now accepts that the Manship vol. 3 prices are just about right?!? In my case it was definitely because I didn't want to make comments about prices on the same thread as the records for sale so I took it away. The Ellusions and Ringleaders were certainly too expensive and both were discussed elsewhere. But I think maybe it was better to move it away from the sales section as it hasn't really caused any trouble (I hope)
Ted Massey Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 got the acetate/studio cut somewhere, sounds so much better. anyone got the Rags To Riches from the acetate? Is that the thing Sam had Chalks
Jerry Hipkiss Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Great cut! Personally, I like the flip better. Not a dancer but a really beautiful ballad. I don't really see it in Chicago much, never mint. I think all the clean stock copies went over to england in the 80s. BASTARDS! Yup, Soul Bowl bought the entire remaining stock - and as we know it was the proverbial "cheapie". however they gradually disappeared into collections and it was a classic case of supply and demand when someone finally reactivated it, no one wanted to sell (that's until they found out what people were offering! ). Good thing is that if you buy one in the UK chances are they'll be in good nick, as Stone Soul says the few that I've seen from US sources have been somewhat unluv'd! Hippo.
Chalky Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Is that the thing Sam had Chalks thinkin of wrong acetate Ted
Bigsoulman Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Never understood why this has fectched any money at all.........biggest load of over-rated muck i can think of Baz!!!, i'm shocked wonderful record one of my top ten all timers, can't believe you don't like this Lenny
Simon T Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 got the acetate/studio cut somewhere, sounds so much better. anyone got the Rags To Riches from the acetate? Isn't Rag to Riches by the Blue Notes of Bernie Williams backing on Fucused O You / It's Needless To Say, but not Harold Melvin fame?
Chalky Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 (edited) Isn't Rag to Riches by the Blue Notes of Bernie Williams backing on Fucused O You / It's Needless To Say, but not Harold Melvin fame? yep...thats the one I was thinking off but I'd also had a few beers It's on one of the acetates of Tears Tell The Whole Sad Story (Needless To Say), the one Rob Thomas owns I think. Can't remember whats on the flip of the one Kitch owns. Edited December 17, 2005 by chalky
Guest Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Spoiling sales again are we? Where are all the guardians of right and wrong when you need them? Some ARE more equal than others.
Simon T Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Spoiling sales again are we? Where are all the guardians of right and wrong when you need them? Some ARE more equal than others.
Chalky Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 (edited) Spoiling sales again are we? Where are all the guardians of right and wrong when you need them? Some ARE more equal than others. Take it that was a reference to me First off the question was why someone would pay so much for a Ringleaders in TALK VINYL. I gave my opinion...just like you do on numerous occasions. If this was in sales I wouldn't say anything but as it was a discussion about the Ringleaders in another forum why shouldn't I be able to say what I think? Is there owt in the post yet? Edited December 17, 2005 by chalky
Simon T Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 yep...thats the one I was thinking off but I'd also had a few beers It's on one of the acetates of Tears Tell The Whole Sad Story (Needless To Say), the one Rob Thomas owns I think. Can't remember whats on the flip of the one Kitch owns. Isn't one of the acetates of TTTWSS attributed to the Topics? I think they're the same cut though.
Chalky Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Isn't one of the acetates of TTTWSS attributed to the Topics? I think they're the same cut though. Not the Topics, different group, although don't think they had anything issued. One of the acetates is uncredited I think but both Bernard Williams and Blue Notes, pretty certain about that....one 7 inch and one 8 or ten inch
Guest Dan Posted December 19, 2005 Posted December 19, 2005 Spoiling sales again are we? Where are all the guardians of right and wrong when you need them? Some ARE more equal than others. different forum, different topic, no mention of anyone ripping people off, christian. don't get paranoid
Chalky Posted December 19, 2005 Posted December 19, 2005 different forum, different topic, no mention of anyone ripping people off, christian. don't get paranoid Dan, I think your getting paranoid and shit stirring mixed up Like I said, I wouldn't dream of saying something out of order in sales and dismissing someones price but like we both said this is in a discussion section
Dave Abbott Posted December 19, 2005 Posted December 19, 2005 Never understood why this has fectched any money at all.........biggest load of over-rated muck i can think of Baz, go clean ya ears out Prob the best £4 i've ever spent
Guest Dan Posted December 20, 2005 Posted December 20, 2005 Dan, I think your getting paranoid and shit stirring mixed up i was being polite, chalky you yorkshire lads are plain speaking folk though
Guest Posted December 20, 2005 Posted December 20, 2005 Dan, I think your getting paranoid and shit stirring mixed up Like I said, I wouldn't dream of saying something out of order in sales and dismissing someones price but like we both said this is in a discussion section I didn't have you in mind at all Chalky. My own involvment in a recent embarassing incident is one thing (and a thing I have apologised for), and general thoughts on the subject is another. My point is that sometimes everyone defends the sellers right to price records anyway he sees fit, the "if you don't like the price, don't buy" doctrine. Many often also defend a buyer who spends ten times the going rate saying that it is his hard earned which he can spend anyway he likes, there are no prices, price is only set by what the highest bidder is prepared to pay, etc. All of this can be said to be true, but sometimes you see the same champions of free pricing freak out and display their anger, scorn, ridicule and general condemnation of certain prices, sellers and buyers. I am personally for sensible commenting and discussion of prices. If someone is listing something for £500, and this is said to be insane in another section of the same forum, it's not exactly going to make much difference is it, the sale is still potentially spoiled. On to the Ringleaders, a great record IMO, but pretty common. I thought the 'going rate' nowadays was around £300 (which is way too much if you ask me), so £500 does seem a bit steep. Maybe some people pay £500 for it nowadays though? P.S. Chalky, an envelope is on the way, it should hopefully be with you in the near future.
Blake H Posted December 20, 2005 Posted December 20, 2005 I didn't have you in mind at all Chalky. My own involvment in a recent embarassing incident is one thing (and a thing I have apologised for), and general thoughts on the subject is another. My point is that sometimes everyone defends the sellers right to price records anyway he sees fit, the "if you don't like the price, don't buy" doctrine. Many often also defend a buyer who spends ten times the going rate saying that it is his hard earned which he can spend anyway he likes, there are no prices, price is only set by what the highest bidder is prepared to pay, etc. All of this can be said to be true, but sometimes you see the same champions of free pricing freak out and display their anger, scorn, ridicule and general condemnation of certain prices, sellers and buyers. I am personally for sensible commenting and discussion of prices. If someone is listing something for £500, and this is said to be insane in another section of the same forum, it's not exactly going to make much difference is it, the sale is still potentially spoiled. On to the Ringleaders, a great record IMO, but pretty common. I thought the 'going rate' nowadays was around £300 (which is way too much if you ask me), so £500 does seem a bit steep. Maybe some people pay £500 for it nowadays though? P.S. Chalky, an envelope is on the way, it should hopefully be with you in the near future. Ever thought of going into politics? BH
Chalky Posted December 20, 2005 Posted December 20, 2005 i was being polite, chalky you yorkshire lads are plain speaking folk though straight to the point lad no use beating round the bush as me gran used to say I didn't have you in mind at all Chalky. My own involvment in a recent embarassing incident is one thing (and a thing I have apologised for), and general thoughts on the subject is another. My point is that sometimes everyone defends the sellers right to price records anyway he sees fit, the "if you don't like the price, don't buy" doctrine. Many often also defend a buyer who spends ten times the going rate saying that it is his hard earned which he can spend anyway he likes, there are no prices, price is only set by what the highest bidder is prepared to pay, etc. All of this can be said to be true, but sometimes you see the same champions of free pricing freak out and display their anger, scorn, ridicule and general condemnation of certain prices, sellers and buyers. I am personally for sensible commenting and discussion of prices. If someone is listing something for £500, and this is said to be insane in another section of the same forum, it's not exactly going to make much difference is it, the sale is still potentially spoiled. On to the Ringleaders, a great record IMO, but pretty common. I thought the 'going rate' nowadays was around £300 (which is way too much if you ask me), so £500 does seem a bit steep. Maybe some people pay £500 for it nowadays though? P.S. Chalky, an envelope is on the way, it should hopefully be with you in the near future. Then accept my apologies But as only Pete Smith and myself mentioned anything to do with a price/value I assumed you was referring to me
Guest Posted December 20, 2005 Posted December 20, 2005 Ever thought of going into politics? BH Yes, I have thought about it actually. I have always been conscious, but it is only recently that I have taken a more active interest in various politics.
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!