Posted February 22, 201213 yr Hi, I've a visually minty copy of this. Unfortunately it sounds muddy and with a few pops. All the copies plays the same ? (press) ? Best.
February 22, 201213 yr On 22/02/2012 at 07:22, Stefan said: Hi, I've a visually minty copy of this. Unfortunately it sounds muddy and with a few pops. All the copies plays the same ? (press) ? Best. my copy plays fine (awesome record). it is a low-fi recording but it sounds like I'm hearing what I'm supposed to be hearing and I don't hear pops.
February 22, 201213 yr Author Thanks Boba On 22/02/2012 at 07:24, boba said: my copy plays fine (awesome record). it is a low-fi recording but it sounds like I'm hearing what I'm supposed to be hearing and I don't hear pops. Thanks Boba, I've agree with you, it's a Lo-Fi sound. The pops have to come from a bubbly press.
February 22, 201213 yr Also have a M copy and that's what you get compared to the Kiyam record they did quiet different sounding, B side as well Do The Drill Jill.
February 22, 201213 yr On 22/02/2012 at 08:52, Prophonics 2029 said: Also have a M copy and that's what you get compared to the Kiyam record they did quiet different sounding, B side as well Do The Drill Jill. I'm pretty sure the kayham group is different with no connection. The kayham record is from LA early sixties (actually supposedly 1960), this record is pittsburgh late 60s. One of the kayham group members was later in the incredibles on audio arts.
Hi,
I've a visually minty copy of this. Unfortunately it sounds muddy and with a few pops.
All the copies plays the same ? (press) ?
Best.