In my musical quest and song writing I highly regard instrumentals as well as the vocal versions of songs. Indeed, I used to flip records over to the instrumental B side and cassette join together to get that longer groove. I often do not like the notion of messing around with an already established song in some cases (which never had an instrumental back in the day), but on certain recordings I think it enhances our user experience as fans and listeners. I like to hear the arrangement and those instruments low in the mix, that make up overall sound etc. With the technology as it is, and philosophy that a new song can exploit different versions, do any of you expect an instrumental version on new releases? For example I am creating 5 east coast style retro 1970's recordings right now and want to give alternative mixes to potential purchasers. This would help with expenses, say, if they bought extra mixes, rather than just the radio edit. I must say that anybody creating music has to think of different models to survive. If you think of the quality of song writing and production back in the 1960's and 70's I think we were spoilt. Today, I feel a songs appeal can be so varied and those who like to club, may indeed prefer the longer mixes, but those like me would be happy with a 1970's package of stereo, no more than 3mins long with a fade out during the singalong at the end!
Anyway, have a listen to this. This is the tail end and outro of a track I am doing now, which will be possibly included as an extra mix etc:
I would appreciate any comments, because I feel strongly that extra mixes benefit the artist too for example as their contract could include royalties from sales etc......so any diverse income supports the enterprise for the label, producers and artists.
Hi everybody -
In my musical quest and song writing I highly regard instrumentals as well as the vocal versions of songs. Indeed, I used to flip records over to the instrumental B side and cassette join together to get that longer groove. I often do not like the notion of messing around with an already established song in some cases (which never had an instrumental back in the day), but on certain recordings I think it enhances our user experience as fans and listeners. I like to hear the arrangement and those instruments low in the mix, that make up overall sound etc. With the technology as it is, and philosophy that a new song can exploit different versions, do any of you expect an instrumental version on new releases? For example I am creating 5 east coast style retro 1970's recordings right now and want to give alternative mixes to potential purchasers. This would help with expenses, say, if they bought extra mixes, rather than just the radio edit. I must say that anybody creating music has to think of different models to survive. If you think of the quality of song writing and production back in the 1960's and 70's I think we were spoilt. Today, I feel a songs appeal can be so varied and those who like to club, may indeed prefer the longer mixes, but those like me would be happy with a 1970's package of stereo, no more than 3mins long with a fade out during the singalong at the end!
Anyway, have a listen to this. This is the tail end and outro of a track I am doing now, which will be possibly included as an extra mix etc:
https://soundcloud.com/55motown/a-little-of-the-big
I would appreciate any comments, because I feel strongly that extra mixes benefit the artist too for example as their contract could include royalties from sales etc......so any diverse income supports the enterprise for the label, producers and artists.