ShorterSoul Posted December 7, 2010 Posted December 7, 2010 https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rt=nc&nma=true&item=350418406911&si=5LdqitL9qs30h3ADKnupnfTjOCg%253D&viewitem=&sspagename=ADME%3AX%3ARTQ%3AUS%3A1123
ShorterSoul Posted December 7, 2010 Author Posted December 7, 2010 ask Mick Smith well if it is the real deal I think someone's got themselves a bargain
Chalky Posted December 7, 2010 Posted December 7, 2010 Doubt you would tell the difference from the info and scan on the listing. If real as said already someone got a real bargain.
Guest Johnny Mack Posted December 7, 2010 Posted December 7, 2010 Matrix numbers confirm this to be an original
Chalky Posted December 7, 2010 Posted December 7, 2010 Matrix numbers confirm this to be an original aren't the same matrix numbers on one of the boots, scratched in?
Ted Massey Posted December 7, 2010 Posted December 7, 2010 yes they are extremely difficult to tell unless u have both together Mick Smith has a real one and have held it but still cant remember how to tell will have a look on saturday
Guest Johnny Mack Posted December 7, 2010 Posted December 7, 2010 Chalky The Pre-fix is different on the Boot to the original. That's the surest way to tell. Original color is lighter and print not as dark Run out thinner on original
Steve G Posted December 8, 2010 Posted December 8, 2010 yes they are extremely difficult to tell unless u have both together Mick Smith has a real one and have held it but still cant remember how to tell will have a look on saturday The answer is in the old thread - nice and easy Ted!!!
Chalky Posted December 8, 2010 Posted December 8, 2010 aren't there two boots? All I've seen is reference to a boot.
Guest Ste Brazil Posted December 8, 2010 Posted December 8, 2010 aren't there two boots? All I've seen is reference to a boot. I had a boot with a green label, sold it a few years ago, is the original a yellow / orange label then?
Steve G Posted December 8, 2010 Posted December 8, 2010 aren't there two boots? All I've seen is reference to a boot. Here is what I posted before Chalky: Right orig has narrower run out groove, and actually looks like a 60s record with a flat edge. Unlike the pressing which has a wider run out and more rounded edges if that makes sense. Also orig has BB223 A in run out in v small letters, boot has BEE 223 A in run out in spread out larger letters. I'm an anorak right?Anyway hope that helps....Steve This post has been edited by Steve G: 14 Apr 2010 - 06:32 PM
Davetay Posted December 8, 2010 Posted December 8, 2010 Chalky The Pre-fix is different on the Boot to the original. That's the surest way to tell. Original color is lighter and print not as dark Run out thinner on original From what I can remember, this one looks the right colour to be a real one. Like you said the writing is more bold on the boot.
Chalky Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 Here is what I posted before Chalky: Right orig has narrower run out groove, and actually looks like a 60s record with a flat edge. Unlike the pressing which has a wider run out and more rounded edges if that makes sense. Also orig has BB223 A in run out in v small letters, boot has BEE 223 A in run out in spread out larger letters. I'm an anorak right?Anyway hope that helps....Steve This post has been edited by Steve G: 14 Apr 2010 - 06:32 PM Hi Steve, you anorak Just looked at JM Guide as I'm now at home, there is two boots, both use the same pressing plate. Paper quality is smooth matt finish. 3 turn deaadwax 11.5mm wide, scratched in matrix, quite large (3.8mm high) and reads as you say Bee 223A. One is heavy strong vinyl with a flat edge 1.02mm thick and reasonably flexible. Second one is thinner vinyl 0.85 mm thick and running out to a thicker pronounced bevel edge1.02mm thick. This thin vinyl is brittle and will break when flexed. Original is vinyl similar to 60's RCA pressing, paper style is grainy matt finish with sharp defined text. No more details. Above courtesy of John Manship.
dthedrug Posted December 11, 2010 Posted December 11, 2010 (edited) well if it is the real deal I think someone's got themselves a bargain HI ALL.... ASK MICK SMITH??? OK! TED I agree with you as this record fools the best of them, and MICK is one of the few copy's about, not sure if it is my old one sold in 1978, however you could ask me? but then again, forget about everything with exception to the paper grain as thats the best way to tell, however if you leave a wet cloth on the boot you can make the label grainy and Matt, if this is the case con-pair with a real one,,, Ask Mick Smith and take a butchers at mi**His Copy I have just looked at the copy, it is not a boot as the artwork is far to fine, However It looks differant to my copy from the 7ts also is there a copy with white in the eyes and beneeth the lines on each bee???or is that the other boot???? DAVE KIL...WISHING ALL MY READERS A HAPPY YULE XX,,,, And a Happy New Year (The Editor) Edited December 11, 2010 by dthedrug
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!