Mike Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 Never understood why people are prepared to pay obscene sums for Tony Ashley when Don's version is so obviously the better of the two. And considerably cheaper, of course... View the full item
Guest Dave Turner Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 (edited) Never understood why people are prepared to pay obscene sums for Tony Ashley when Don's version is so obviously the better of the two. And considerably cheaper, of course... View the full item Myself I can never choose the better version. There are many who prefer Don Bryant and then again there are many who prefer Tony Ashley. One week I prefer Bryant and the next I'll prefer Ashley. John Ridley obviously prefers Tony Ashley https://www.sirshambl...tony_ashley.htm Why do people pay obscene sums for Tony Ashley? Is £600+ an obscene sum when talking vinyl. It's in the collector's psych. If it exists and is rare then it's a desirable collectors item. Same question can be asked as to why some folks pay even more obscene sums for a piece of musical shite. Why is £600+ an obscene sum for a deep soul record but doesn't even raise an eyebrow for a not particularly rare northern track? It beats me why Tony Ashley going for £600 creates a sensation but in the Mark Cappanni thread they're talking about that piece of shite (IMO) being worth £500 and not so much as a gasp of shock. There are heavy duty deep soul collectors who are just as obsessive as their northern counterparts. If I was fortunate enough to own both Bryant and Ashley then it may be Bryant would be the one I'd ply most but as a collector it's the Ashley that would give me the most satisfaction to have in my box. Edited February 5, 2010 by Dave Turner
Pete S Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 in the Mark Cappanni thread they're talking about that piece of shite (IMO) being worth £500 and not so much as a gasp of shock. Woah there! At least 3 of us expressed our amazement voiceiferously (sp.)
Guest Dave Turner Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 Woah there! At least 3 of us expressed our amazement voiceiferously (sp.) Sorry Pete, I didn't update myself on the thread before opening me gob I know its supply and demand and all that but it does surprise me that so much Northern go for ridiculous prices when not really that rare Lou Ragland - I Travel Alone is many, many more times common than Tony Ashley and goes for £800-1000 but Tony Ashley creates a shock at £600 Just surprises me really as in vinyl collecting terms £600 is big money but not that big.
Pete S Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 Sorry Pete, I didn't update myself on the thread before opening me gob I know its supply and demand and all that but it does surprise me that so much Northern go for ridiculous prices when not really that rare Lou Ragland - I Travel Alone is many, many more times common than Tony Ashley and goes for £800-1000 but Tony Ashley creates a shock at £600 Just surprises me really as in vinyl collecting terms £600 is big money but not that big. Some records described as 'rare' just make me laugh. Jack Montgomery on Scepter, Garland Green on Revue, that sort of thing - theres a copy on ebay every day...should be £20 each!
Guest Dave Turner Posted February 5, 2010 Posted February 5, 2010 Some records described as 'rare' just make me laugh. Jack Montgomery on Scepter, Garland Green on Revue, that sort of thing - theres a copy on ebay every day...should be £20 each! Obviously the supply and demand thing. All the Garland Greens were in nearly everybodies sales boxes and could hardly be given away at one time. In fact I think they used to be soul pack fodder. Personally think they are great records but no-one ever wanted them because they were so common and were always near the back of anyone's collection.
Recommended Posts
Get involved with Soul Source
Add your comments now
Join Soul Source
A free & easy soul music affair!
Join Soul Source now!Log in to Soul Source
Jump right back in!
Log in now!