Guest Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 Just to show I can still turn them up. Monster unknown Northern, on RCA. Strings arranged by Leon Pendarvis. Sounds like a cross between Bobby Womack's "Home Is Where The Heart Is" and Clarence Carter "Messing With My Mind". Kev Roberts simply couldn't believe it was possible when I showed it to him. Nowhere in Manship's book, or Tim Brown's book, or on Gemm or on e-Bay. No trace of it anywhere. I found Jim Gilstrap's "Run Run Run" back in 2002, when no-one knew it existed, and there are still only two known copies to this date. Now I think this might be even rarer. NOBODY but NOBODY has ever heard of it before. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
ajb Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 ian, whats on the flip side alan Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Billywhizz Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 Just to show I can still turn them up. Monster unknown Northern, on RCA. Strings arranged by Leon Pendarvis. Sounds like a cross between Bobby Womack's "Home Is Where The Heart Is" and Clarence Carter "Messing With My Mind". Kev Roberts simply couldn't believe it was possible when I showed it to him. Nowhere in Manship's book, or Tim Brown's book, or on Gemm or on e-Bay. No trace of it anywhere. I found Jim Gilstrap's "Run Run Run" back in 2002, when no-one knew it existed, and there are still only two known copies to this date. Now I think this might be even rarer. NOBODY but NOBODY has ever heard of it before. Run run run first heard at rocket, exellent dance record, Ian is there any chance of hearing it pretty please billy Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 ian, whats on the flip side alan Maybe later. "Divide And Conquer" is actually the B side. I could have covered it up and blown everyone's mind for the next twenty years, but if I had, you'd all have accused me of it being by the Four Vandals. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
ajb Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 Maybe later. "Divide And Conquer" is actually the B side. I could have covered it up and blown everyone's mind for the next twenty years, but if I had, you'd all have accused me of it being by the Four Vandals. whats the a side, then LOL alan Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest BigPaul Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 Maybe later. "Divide And Conquer" is actually the B side. I could have covered it up and blown everyone's mind for the next twenty years, but if I had, you'd all have accused me of it being by the Four Vandals. Could you do a Refosoul Clip for us, please Ian Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Simon T Posted April 20, 2009 Share Posted April 20, 2009 whats the a side, then LOL alan Are the first letters of the A side's title TWABMB ? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Are the first letters of the A side's title TWABMB ? Almost. TWABMBT I'm shocked. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Dave Turner Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Are the first letters of the A side's title TWABMB ? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I'm not deflated at all. The record is clearly rare and incredibly hard to find and monster Northern. I just pulled it off a shelf of my collection, while sorting out the fabulous soul packs I was doing, and wondered why I'd never heard it before. Bloody good job I didn't sell it for a quid, like I did with Moon Williams. Anyway, just because the guy's found the title in some listing somewhere, doesn't mean anyone else has turned up the actual record, now does it ??? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Ian Dewhirst Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I'm not deflated at all. The record is clearly rare and incredibly hard to find and monster Northern. I just pulled it off a shelf of my collection, while sorting out the fabulous soul packs I was doing, and wondered why I'd never heard it before. Bloody good job I didn't sell it for a quid, like I did with Moon Williams. Anyway, just because the guy's found the title in some listing somewhere, doesn't mean anyone else has turned up the actual record, now does it ??? This is more like it mate! I reckon you should introduce some of those other goodies you're keeping under wraps........ Ian D Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) I'm not deflated at all. The record is clearly rare and incredibly hard to find and monster Northern. I just pulled it off a shelf of my collection, while sorting out the fabulous soul packs I was doing, and wondered why I'd never heard it before. Bloody good job I didn't sell it for a quid, like I did with Moon Williams. Anyway, just because the guy's found the title in some listing somewhere, doesn't mean anyone else has turned up the actual record, now does it ??? Now Ian's answer should have deflated your ballon , Dave Regarding the 45 Ian - how long has it resided on your shelf ? Welcome back , Ian Malc Burton Edited April 21, 2009 by Malc Burton Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Regarding the 45 Ian - how long has it resided on your shelf ? I reckon it came from the St. Louis stuff, so eleven years. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest James Trouble Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Is this like hang man and if we get it right before we hang the man we get a sound file or a scan? It reminds me of playing scrabble with my granny. Exciting. Have we got 399 more of these to look forward to or does this make it 401 in total? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
KevH Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I'm not deflated at all. The record is clearly rare and incredibly hard to find and monster Northern. I just pulled it off a shelf of my collection, while sorting out the fabulous soul packs I was doing, and wondered why I'd never heard it before. Bloody good job I didn't sell it for a quid, like I did with Moon Williams. Anyway, just because the guy's found the title in some listing somewhere, doesn't mean anyone else has turned up the actual record, now does it ??? Let the proles be the judge of that Ian.Post it up,them we'll judge if its monster Northern. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Dave Turner Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) Now Ian's answer should have deflated your ballon , Dave Regarding the 45 Ian - how long has it resided on your shelf ? Welcome back , Ian Malc Burton Late night boredom and couldn't resist it Malc, just seemed funny with all the initial bluster about it. Would be interested to hear it though. Dave Edited April 21, 2009 by Dave Turner Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Couldn't resist it Malc, just seemed funny with all the initial bluster about it. Neither could I mate It is a pity that what could be a good thread , is being dragged into the gutter again . Malc Burton Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Billywhizz Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Let the proles be the judge of that Ian.Post it up,them we'll judge if its monster Northern. ill ask ian to do that, if he wont do it for me he wont do it for anyone, or will he, come on ian dont keep me in suspenders. Billy Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Dave Turner Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Neither could I mate It is a pity that what could be a good thread , is being dragged into the gutter again . Malc Burton Not wishing to drag the thread into the gutter Malc, I'd have found it funny whoever it was. I'm off to make a cuppa and will say no more Dave Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 Is this like hang man and if we get it right before we hang the man we get a sound file or a scan? It reminds me of playing scrabble with my granny. Exciting. Have we got 399 more of these to look forward to or does this make it 401 in total? How exactly is this relevant to the thread? Jayne. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 How exactly is this relevant to the thread? Jayne. It isn't, Jayne. I've still got eighty thousand 45s. I don't need to justify myself and I have nothing to prove. If I was indeed going to post up a clip, then, after that bit he said about 401, I've changed my mind. Let someone else go out and find a second copy, then they can gladly post a clip of it. I've finished sorting my collection now. I've got ten thousand of them selected and sorted in cardboard covers, full of unknown collectable rare and unknown soul. The more I'm challenged on it, the more I'm keeping my lips sealed. Anyone who knows me knows what I'm capable of turning up. I do not need to prove it to immature children. Hope you understand where I'm coming from, Jayne, and hope you don't mind. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) Not wishing to drag the thread into the gutter Malc, I'd have found it funny whoever it was. I'm off to make a cuppa and will say no more Dave My sincere apologies Dave - I was not having a go at you mate ......... My comment was made in respect of the reply from the usual protaganist , whose barbed retorts are expected every time Ian posts , irrespective of the topic . Malc Burton Edited April 21, 2009 by Malc Burton Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Dave Turner Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 My sincere apologies Dave - I was not having a go at you mate ......... My comment was made in respect of the reply from the usual protaganist , whose barbed retorts are expected every time Ian posts , irrespective of the topic . Malc Burton No probs mate Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Godzilla Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 RCA 11367 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Matt Male Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I have to agree with James on this one. What's the point of starting a thread going on about a great new discovery without posting a sound file? Post it up and let us give our opinions of it. You do have nothing to prove Ian but this thread is meaningless without a sound file in my opinion. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest James Trouble Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 RCA 11367 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest James Trouble Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) How exactly is this relevant to the thread? Jayne. I'm just wondering how we are going to get a scan or a sound file. It's like a game of hang man, it's exciting stuff, really it is. Ian boasts about an amazing new discovery, but no details and no sound file, the tension is almost unbearable. I'm not sure what's more enthralling, our 4-4 with The Gooners or Ian's unknown RCA monster without sound file or details. 399 of these to go (or is it 400?), that's enough to keep the newies scene going for a generation Edited April 21, 2009 by James Trouble Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest proudlove Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 It isn't, Jayne. I've still got eighty thousand 45s. I don't need to justify myself and I have nothing to prove. If I was indeed going to post up a clip, then, after that bit he said about 401, I've changed my mind. Let someone else go out and find a second copy, then they can gladly post a clip of it. I've finished sorting my collection now. I've got ten thousand of them selected and sorted in cardboard covers, full of unknown collectable rare and unknown soul. The more I'm challenged on it, the more I'm keeping my lips sealed. Anyone who knows me knows what I'm capable of turning up. I do not need to prove it to immature children. Hope you understand where I'm coming from, Jayne, and hope you don't mind.Ian,not a fan,but I admire a man who will stick to his principles----------see you at the Torch atb Steve Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest BigPaul Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I'm just wondering how we are going to get a scan or a sound file. It's like a game of hang man, it's exciting stuff, really it is. Ian boasts about an amazing new discovery, but no details and no sound file, the tension is almost unbearable. I'm not sure what's more enthralling, our 4-4 with The Gooners or Ian's unknown RCA monster without sound file or details. 399 of these to go (or is it 400?), that's enough to keep the newies scene going for a generation This prole asked for a sound file last night and was ignored said please to in the opening post last night "just to show i can still turn em up" tonight its "i dont need to justify myself and i have nothing to prove" Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 If I was indeed going to post up a clip, then, after that bit he said about 401, I've changed my mind. Let someone else go out and find a second copy, then they can gladly post a clip of it. I indeed would do the same!, sadly I understand completely. Jayne.x Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 21, 2009 Share Posted April 21, 2009 I have to agree with James on this one. What's the point of starting a thread going on about a great new discovery without posting a sound file? Post it up and let us give our opinions of it. You do have nothing to prove Ian but this thread is meaningless without a sound file in my opinion. but what's the point now Matt? surely you guess the reactions Ian's going to get to it, whatever it sounds like. Tracks will be unfairly judged by some, just waiting to make a mockery because of who is posting them up if he does. I hope I'm wrong but I suspect not. Jayne.x Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 but what's the point now Matt? surely you guess the reactions Ian's going to get to it, whatever it sounds like. Tracks will be unfairly judged by some, just waiting to make a mockery because of who is posting them up if he does. I hope I'm wrong but I suspect not. Jayne.x However good it is, it will get mocked purely because I was the one who turned it up. If it had been 1973, they'd be mocking Frank Beverly and Lee David. Anyway, I played it to Steve and Sue Handbury down the phone and they loved it. I have no way of transferring it from a vinyl seven inch to my computer, so can't make a clip anyway. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 However good it is, it will get mocked purely because I was the one who turned it up. If it had been 1973, they'd be mocking Frank Beverly and Lee David. Anyway, I played it to Steve and Sue Handbury down the phone and they loved it. I have no way of transferring it from a vinyl seven inch to my computer, so can't make a clip anyway. Steve and Sue,who are them ? must be good Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Neither could I mate It is a pity that what could be a good thread , is being dragged into the gutter again . Malc Burton Must be great to be a member of Team-Levine. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 This prole asked for a sound file last night and was ignored said please to in the opening post last night "just to show i can still turn em up" tonight its "i dont need to justify myself and i have nothing to prove" Interesting observation Paul! Do you think he really has a copy of this record or is it just another "look at me thread"? Perhaps we should have a poll if no soundfile materialises? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest James Trouble Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) However good it is, it will get mocked purely because I was the one who turned it up. If it had been 1973, they'd be mocking Frank Beverly and Lee David. Are you really treated with such contemptuous mirth? Can you give us some examples of things you have discovered that have been derided because you discovered them, or records derided because you made them and not because they were sub standard or irrelevant? Why do you think this happens, if it does at all? If it does happen, what does this say about the crowd you are so desperate to appeal to? And if it is not true, do you think you are perhaps delusional? There must be some confusion in your head here? You are desperate for acceptance on the soul scene, but you spit venom at it when it doesn't accept your work, and you now think the first of your 401 'unknown northern monsters' before you've even posted a file or record details. You either respect the scene and it's opinion, or you hate it and couldn't care what it thinks? Edited April 22, 2009 by James Trouble Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
ajb Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Are you really treated with such contemptuous mirth? Can you give us some examples of things you have discovered that have been derided because you discovered them, or records derided because you made them and not because they were sub standard or irrelevant? Why do you think this happens, if it does at all? If it does happen, what does this say about the crowd you are so desperate to appeal to? And if it is not true, do you think you are perhaps delusional? There must be some confusion in your head here? You are desperate for acceptance on the soul scene, but you spit venom at it when it doesn't accept your work, and you now think the first of your 401 'unknown northern monsters' before you've even posted a file or record details. You either respect the scene and it's opinion, or you hate it and couldn't care what it thinks? don't know you bud, but, from the outside it looks to me that you are a bit obsessed with ian, as any thread headed up by him, you seem to be there. only an observation, but, if i was as obsessive about this one person as you seem to be, i would be slightly concerned. i'd like to think were all grown ups on here (some need to act like them), and we can make our own minds up about people. i for one don't need you, chirping up every time this guy starts a thread. it has become tiresome and boring. so do us all a favor, and give it a rest. its not big, and its certainly not clever. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
paup-ine Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) Ian, already the track is doomed by some. Shame. I can't even be bothered to read some of thier posts made, in detail. They come over as being not too nice people, all of the time. P Edited April 22, 2009 by paup-ine Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
pikeys dog Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Must be great to be a member of Team-Levine. Fair play to him Dave, it must be murder keeping the Levine "cart on it's wheels". Afterall, he's got to keep the main attraction on side for the Torch revival Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Ian, already the track is doomed by some. Shame. I can't even be bothered to read some of thier posts made, in detail. They come over as being not too nice people, all of the time. P Team-Levine is almost complete. Where is Pete s? Fair play to him Dave, it must be murder keeping the Levine "cart on it's wheels". Afterall, he's got to keep the main attraction on side for the Torch revival Handcart to hell, I would imagine Joe? And I think you mean "star DJ". Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest James Trouble Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) Ok, let's stop pissing about. James Lovjoy - This will always be my baby's tune RCA 11367 The 2 copies I have have typos on the label and spelt Lovjoy, not Lovejoy. I don't think it's worth more than a tenner, which is perhaps why it's not in any of the price guides? So, 399 to go, or is it still 400? Edited April 22, 2009 by James Trouble Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
KevH Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Ian, already the track is doomed by some. Shame. I can't even be bothered to read some of thier posts made, in detail. They come over as being not too nice people, all of the time. P Hi P,no the track is NOT already doomed. In the interests of discovering new Northern,and therefore keeping the scene alive,i would love to hear it. If its good i will say so. Ian,is it 60's or 70's.? How did R.Searling miss it?.....atb ....Kev Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
KevH Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Ok, let's stop pissing about. James Lovjoy - This will always be my baby's tune RCA 11367 The 2 copies I have have typos on the label and spelt Lovjoy, not Lovejoy. I don't think it's worth more than a tenner, which is perhaps why it's not in any of the price guides? ,naughty boy James. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Pete S Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Team-Levine is almost complete. Where is Pete s? Oi, I just want to hear the bloody record! Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Pete S Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 ,naughty boy James. There's nothing naughty about uncovering a record, especially when someone's claimed to have discovered it as an unknown - there are very few records that are going to be unknown nowadays. Ian should have put up a sound file to start off with instead of shouting about it being unknown. And as for not being able to get a sound file on the computer Ian - you're having a laugh surely. Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 Oi, I just want to hear the bloody record! Beg pardon.. don't we all? Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest James Trouble Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) I'll try and sort a sound file later but i'm moving house this week record decks are packed away, but not sure I can be arsed anyway, it's not that special. I'll have another listen though maybe I missed something... Edited April 22, 2009 by James Trouble Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest James Trouble Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) Ian should have put up a sound file to start off with instead of shouting about it being unknown. And as for not being able to get a sound file on the computer Ian - you're having a laugh surely. But Pete, Steve and Sue didn't know it!!!!! Edited April 22, 2009 by James Trouble Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Sebastian Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 is it 60's or 70's.? From 1978 according to the RCA discography: James Lovejoy - Divide & Conquer / This Will Always Be My Baby's Tune - RCA 11367 Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Guest James Trouble Posted April 22, 2009 Share Posted April 22, 2009 (edited) It probably deserves a Trouble Remix to give it the exposure it needs to go "huge unknown northern soul"!!!! Ian, how long do we have to wait for another of the 400? I like this game There were 400 rare unknown records, hanging on the wall, 400 rare unknown records, hanging on the wall. And if one rare unknown record, should accidently be in James Trouble's collection, There'll be 399 rare unknown records, hanging on the wall. Edited April 22, 2009 by James Trouble Link to comment Social source share More sharing options...
Recommended Posts