Jump to content

Men jailed for ‘fake’ vinyl records scam

Men jailed for ‘fake’ vinyl records scam magazine cover

local news carrying this story

 

Men jailed for ‘fake’ vinyl records scam

Two men have been jailed and two others given suspended sentences for making and selling tens of thousands of niche counterfeit vinyl records.

Christopher Price, 68, Stephen Russell, 65, Robert Pye, 63, and Alan Godfrey, 61, were part of a group which distributed unlicensed recordings of 1960s Northern Soul artists.

On Friday a court heard about 55,000 unlicensed records were seized by police following an investigation by the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), which represents record companies in the UK including Warner Music, Sony Music Entertainment, and Universal Music Group.

full story via

https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/national/17268780.men-jailed-for-fake-vinyl-records-scam/

 

Local news clip

 



Edited by mike

  • Up vote 6

Members Comments

Recommended Comments



Ian Stacey

Posted

On ‎02‎/‎12‎/‎2018 at 19:26, Winsford Soul said:

Many years ago when I had one of the first Terry Callier. Ordinary Joe. Cadet demos I was offered through a third party £750 and a further percentage amount depending on sales to lend my record out. A small part of me was tempted not with the money but at the thought of lots more people would have the chance to get a copy of one of the greatest songs ever laid down on vinyl but i couldn't do it on principle.  

Steve 

good man. I cant stand djs that do that .

Blackpoolsoul

Posted

This one has always interested me (looks like the cat number is a D.O.B.)

 

 

KIngy.jpg

Kingy B.jpg

Tlscapital

Posted

5 hours ago, Blackpoolsoul said:

This one has always interested me (looks like the cat number is a D.O.B.)

 

 

KIngy.jpg

Kingy B.jpg

Things of beauty 🤢, I collect those 🤥 and find it hard to get a proper discography 👸🏽 of the Kingy records 🙈 and their rather complicated catalogue numbering system 👾... Boot or worthless reissues... as Johnny Moore sang; Just be for real !

Blackpoolsoul

Posted

3 minutes ago, tlscapital said:

Things of beauty 🤢, I collect those 🤥 and find it hard to get a proper discography 👸🏽 of the Kingy records 🙈 and their rather complicated catalogue numbering system 👾... Boot or worthless reissues... as Johnny Moore sang; Just be for real !

So do we know who did it/them ?

Tlscapital

Posted

2 minutes ago, Blackpoolsoul said:

So do we know who did it/them ?

392907926_Capturedcran2018-12-0512_47_58.png.176d39b589bf45a3b0f0013248fd90fc.png

Soulsides

Posted

On 04/12/2018 at 10:39, Rocky said:

 

Hmmmm, illegal or not it's a bit hypocritical if you sell a legal 7" for hundreds profit and don't give a penny to the artist or label don't you think?!?

             

                      ⚠️

                KEEP CALM

               AND ENJOY

            FUNNY  ILLOGICAL

               COMMENTS

 

         

Chalky

Posted

1 hour ago, Blackpoolsoul said:

So do we know who did it/them ?

I would have thought it obvious who did it given the label name?  I thought everyone knew but obviously not. 

Tlscapital

Posted

5 minutes ago, chalky said:

I would have thought it obvious who did it given the label name?  I thought everyone knew but obviously not. 

Are you implying it is not Kong ? 🤔

Speedlimit

Posted

Let's just say they were done in Nottingham along with a whole batch of others in the early 2000's I'm saying no more

Tlscapital

Posted

Once upon a time, King Kong had a quiet place... Until some western business crook showed up...

Fuzzj

Posted

squeaky bum time.

Mark Howell

Posted

On 05/12/2018 at 13:06, tlscapital said:

Are you implying it is not Kong ? 🤔

Christ its not Kong?

Bunderthollox

Posted

On 30/11/2018 at 18:18, Steve S 60 said:

The Proceeds of Crime hearing should be interesting.

Might be interesting to turn up at a disposal of goods auction? 

Bunderthollox

Posted

On 05/12/2018 at 13:20, speedlimit said:

Let's just say they were done in Nottingham along with a whole batch of others in the early 2000's I'm saying no more

No need-the same bastard sold me a load out of his boot wen I it’s stared collecting-specials he said-the prat-I got rid 

Davenpete

Posted

As it happens I did the initial artwork for the birthday giveaway label as a favour to him. 

If i'm assuming right the 'others' you are referring to are the white labels - actually you're wrong - he got the blame for them but someone else did them (apart from the initial ones which he had official permission from Motown to do SOME in order 'to promote to DJs' ahead of the unissued CD comps) - I know exactly who but let's leave it there - don't forget without his running with the ball on the permission thing we would never have seen most of that stuff.

Dx

Blackpoolsoul

Posted

9 minutes ago, DaveNPete said:

As it happens I did the initial artwork for the birthday giveaway label as a favour to him. 

If i'm assuming right the 'others' you are referring to are the white labels - actually you're wrong - he got the blame for them but someone else did them (apart from the initial ones which he had official permission from Motown to do SOME in order 'to promote to DJs' ahead of the unissued CD comps) - I know exactly who but let's leave it there - don't forget without his running with the ball on the permission thing we would never have seen most of that stuff.

Dx

So just to confirm the ones with artwork are not bootlegs then like everyone said ? :)

Davenpete

Posted

The initial production in small numbers supposedly had the nod from Harry Weingler at Motown to be put out to DJs as they were at least initially (they certainly willingly initially gave him full access to the digitised tape vaults) to pre-promote the planned releases of the CDs of unissued stuff - though of course he did 'run with the ball' somewhat - though ultimately MUCH to our benefit.

Dx

Davenpete

Posted

Ref-Kingy I did the initial one that he did as a giveaway for his birthday bash (and said he had rights for) - thereafter I had nothing to do with them.

Dx

Winsford Soul

Posted

27 minutes ago, DaveNPete said:

Ref-Kingy I did the initial one that he did as a giveaway for his birthday bash (and said he had rights for) - thereafter I had nothing to do with them.

Dx

Dave. That was the. Marvin Gaye 

it's killing me ( love starved heart) for his 40th bash at Bretby I'm assuming 

Steve 

Davenpete

Posted

I forget - a long time ago.

Dx

Blackpoolsoul

Posted

19 minutes ago, Winsford Soul said:

Dave. That was the. Marvin Gaye 

it's killing me ( love starved heart) for his 40th bash at Bretby I'm assuming 

Steve 

 

Chris.jpg

Davenpete

Posted

No not one I did.

Dx

Guest Shufflin

Posted

someone paid £85 for one those last September according to Discogs, so this was licenced then?

Blackpoolsoul

Posted

12 hours ago, shufflin said:

someone paid £85 for one those last September according to Discogs, so this was licenced then?

It appears these were both made for a particular DJ to celebrate his birthdays, at the time and as yet we have no idea as to whether they were licensed, I am pretty sure with the knowledge on this site someone will know if they were or weren't

Daved

Posted

I picked up two of the Marvin Gaye’s on the night at Bretby in 1996. Only got one left though. Traded one for a CD on the night.

Julianb

Posted

Brexit can't come fast enough😀

Steve G

Posted

32 minutes ago, Blackpoolsoul said:

 

What do we reckon ?

Frankie Beverly on Fairmount for E9.50 bargain!!! 🤣 

 

Blackpoolsoul

Posted

1 hour ago, JulianB said:

Brexit can't come fast enough😀

I am staggered at the repros of the Soul Sounds ones.....Bootlegs of Bootlegs......wow !!!!

Perhaps one of our Spanish friends on Soul source will contact the authorities

 

Guest Spain pete

Posted

I know nothing !!

Tlscapital

Posted

18 hours ago, JulianB said:

Brexit can't come fast enough😀

Merely a nasty Spanish job from an initial nasty British job... 

652605499_Capturedcran2019-01-1712_21_13.png.457f30d6d16bad8e1505aa08a164e137.png

Ady Croasdell

Posted

On 16/01/2019 at 17:12, chalky said:

@ady croasdell some of yours amongst this lot of dodgy discs

Thanks Chalky I’ll look into it

 

Ady

Blackpoolsoul

Posted

On 16/01/2019 at 17:12, Chalky said:

@ady croasdell some of yours amongst this lot of dodgy discs

Is it me or is this happening again ?

<links to name and addresses removed by site>

Timillustrator

Posted

3 hours ago, Blackpoolsoul said:

Is it me or is this happening again ?

 

Well that's certainly interesting but all it literally means is that he founded a limited company a year after he was found guilty and that the company is still registered. They've not filed any accounts yet so it may well be dormant and it could be a legit company and he's going straight. 

Starting and running Limited Companies in this country is pretty lightly regulated and even if someone's banned from being a company director (which I don't believe he was?) there's nothing to stop them opening another one in the name of their spouse or brother or a friend as I've seen a few times. 

Certainly one to watch though!

 

 

Mike

Posted

3 hours ago, Blackpoolsoul said:

Is it me or is this happening again ?

55 minutes ago, Timillustrator said:

Well that's certainly interesting but all it literally means is that he founded a limited company a year after he was found guilty and that the company is still registered. They've not filed any accounts yet so it may well be dormant and it could be a legit company and he's going straight. 

Certainly one to watch though!

 

 

am weary of these lazy ill-informed posts by you @Blackpoolsoul and the similar lazy follow-on posts that they bring to here

As you have been told many times now

you can not post names/addresses of people asking if they are involved in current criminal activities

With this latest one 

A quick 5 second google will show that there is a website run by that company/person

Then a quick look on that website will then show that it is selling current releases.

If you are not happy with what you see then take it up with the relevant authorities

Do not post accusations etc up on here with out facts as they will have to be removed as per our terms of use

 





×
×
  • Create New...